Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 27 Nov 2010 (Saturday) 10:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

take pic and chainlink fence not show

 
TeleFragger
Goldmember
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 219
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Williamstown, NJ
     
Nov 27, 2010 10:41 |  #1

Ok so our hockey games are outside... street hockey... i get ok pics now and then.. but my delema is for about 4' is wood.. then a chainlink fence ontop of it...
normally i go up to the fence and take a pic through it...

but im curious... a guy on our team has a nikon d700. he just aims, shoots, and no chainlink fence...

from what i searched on google.. they say a high F.... like F/4-F/8
anyone have any experience with this?

sorry if it has been asked before... i searched chain link and fence and didnt see much.. saw the one of the lion where he wanted to hide the chainlink fence behind the lion....

im heading out soon so thought id ask first while we get ready...

thanks guys...


GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse (external link)****RF-603 Discussion
Canon 7Dm2 Gripped | 32GB Transcend CF | 64GB Toshiba FlashAir | YN-468 Flash | YN-468 II Flash | RF-603 | EF-S 18-55 IS|EF 24-105L|EF 50 MKII 1.8|EF-S 55-250 IS |EF 85 1.8| Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC |Primo's Trigger Stick Monopod | Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod
if I post a pic.. it is there to be picked on... (I have thick skin.. im in IT)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mjww
Senior Member
675 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cayman Islands
     
Nov 27, 2010 10:46 |  #2

Sounds like he is using a shallow depth of field to capture the players and the fence is a blur. The fence is there but just so far out of focus that it isn't visible.


Equipment list - According to the wife - "how many more lenses do you need? Yet another camera?"  ???

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
redjamesg
Senior Member
Avatar
757 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 45
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
     
Nov 27, 2010 10:48 |  #3

If you shoot with a shallow DOF (wide open), and are fairly close to the fence, it will become so blurred out from the shallow DOF that it will disappear from the photo.
But you have to make sure the focus is where the action is on the other side of the fence and not on the barbed wire.


Don't worry Ma'am, We're university students, We know what We're doing.
Stuff | Web (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saintseminole
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Nov 27, 2010 10:48 |  #4

TeleFragger wrote in post #11353413 (external link)
A guy on our team has a Nikon D700. he just aims, shoots, and no chainlink fence... From what i searched on Google, they say a high F... like F/4-F/8

Maybe you didn't read far enough?
1. The camera is (almost) irrelevant.
2. What you're looking for is a low f-number (wide aperture) like f/2.8 or wider
(This is a feature of the lens, not of the camera.)
3. What you're actually trying to achieve is a "narrow depth of field."

Narrow depth of field is affected by several factors:
* Aperture (wider is better)
* Focal length (longer is better)
* Distance from sensor to subject
* Distance from subject to foreground/background

So...
1) Get/use a lens with a wide aperture.
2) Set your camera (in either Av or M) to employ the wide aperture
3) Make sure the fence is close to your camera
4) Make sure your subject is far (as possible) from the fence.

Shot at f/3.5 with a short lens (18mm):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


Shot at f/3.2 with a long lens (200mm):
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


I hope that helps. :-)

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/saintseminole/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr.Wig
Junior Member
Avatar
23 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Gresford, UK
     
Nov 27, 2010 10:48 |  #5

What you need is a long focal length.
If you are pretty close to the fence (say 10ft) you should be able to 'zoom' through it.
A 100-400 is really helpful in doing this :cool:

Ian.


EOS 400D | BG-E3 | Sigma 10-20 | Sigma 17-70 | EF 50 f1.8 | EF-S 55-250 | EF 100-400 L | MP E-65mm Macro | Speedlite 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeleFragger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 219
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Williamstown, NJ
     
Nov 27, 2010 11:08 |  #6

saintseminole wrote in post #11353446 (external link)
Maybe you didn't read far enough?
1. The camera is (almost) irrelevant.
2. What you're looking for is a low f-number (wide aperture) like f/2.8 or wider
(This is a feature of the lens, not of the camera.)
3. What you're actually trying to achieve is a "narrow depth of field."

Narrow depth of field is affected by several factors:
* Aperture (wider is better)
* Focal length (longer is better)
* Distance from sensor to subject
* Distance from subject to foreground/background

So...
1) Get/use a lens with a wide aperture.
2) Set your camera (in either Av or M) to employ the wide aperture
3) Make sure the fence is close to your camera
4) Make sure your subject is far (as possible) from the fence.

Shot at f/3.5 with a short lens (18mm):
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


Shot at f/3.2 with a long lens (200mm):
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


I hope that helps. :-)

ok first..

yall are quick!!!!!! appreciate it too...

second.. so if i use my 85mm lens... i can get to 1.8.... so ill try those suggestions..
the guy with the nikon (i know the camera is almost irrelevant)...we are about 15-20' from the fence.. ill grab pics later of the layout... with my kit lens...

so we are up a bit and it is tough to get through the links from that distance with the 85mm...

ill set it as you said..

so
1/500
F/1.8 (or F/2.0)
ISO 100 - maybe 200 but it appears to be bright out...

here is what im dealing with..
now this pic is with my 85mm but it was
F/4.5
1/800
ISO-200

i think i had it on one of the settings where i could set the speed but everything else was on auto... this is when i first got the lens last month... as i have only had my camera for 2 months or so...

today i will probably use M as im getting better acquainted with the settings...

few pics will be up later...
one son with game at 2PM (10 year old they are in first place..)
http://www.leaguelineu​p.com …4562404&divisio​nid=334742 (external link)

second son is a riout ... 4yrs old... and they get all the kids and break them up in 4's and teach them....

please dont bash the pic.. it was in jpg and freshly new with camera.. no editing... gonna shoot raw today (and jpg) and delete raws that i dont care about....so hopefully some better pics today...

edited...
also only my 85mm will go down below 4 so guess that is my only choice...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse (external link)****RF-603 Discussion
Canon 7Dm2 Gripped | 32GB Transcend CF | 64GB Toshiba FlashAir | YN-468 Flash | YN-468 II Flash | RF-603 | EF-S 18-55 IS|EF 24-105L|EF 50 MKII 1.8|EF-S 55-250 IS |EF 85 1.8| Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC |Primo's Trigger Stick Monopod | Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod
if I post a pic.. it is there to be picked on... (I have thick skin.. im in IT)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeleFragger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 219
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Williamstown, NJ
     
Nov 27, 2010 11:15 |  #7

saintseminole wrote in post #11353446 (external link)
2. What you're looking for is a low f-number (wide aperture) like f/2.8 or wider


I hope that helps. :-)


so now that really messes things up....
guess im not gonna look at the 24-105 now.. being a F/4

my main photography is for my kids sports.. soccer and hockey..
most games are at night so trying to learn the M settings as even auto on iso is setting at 6400 which i didnt realize and i dont have really any great pics...

the 100-400 is on my list to get for soccer... as on a crop body i dont think ill use 400 much... currently my sigma i have used at 300 but not all the time (so 300 is 480 on a crop)

shees trying to get the right lenses for the right pictures is gonna be interesting...


GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse (external link)****RF-603 Discussion
Canon 7Dm2 Gripped | 32GB Transcend CF | 64GB Toshiba FlashAir | YN-468 Flash | YN-468 II Flash | RF-603 | EF-S 18-55 IS|EF 24-105L|EF 50 MKII 1.8|EF-S 55-250 IS |EF 85 1.8| Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC |Primo's Trigger Stick Monopod | Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod
if I post a pic.. it is there to be picked on... (I have thick skin.. im in IT)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Nov 27, 2010 11:28 |  #8

The closer you get to the fence the more it will diffract across your image as to not really be seen. However, keep in mind that even though the fence may "disappear", it will have an impact on your overall IQ. For example, you can do this at a zoo too, but their fencing is usually more dense and you can see the impact on IQ even more than a standard chain link fence will. The fence diffraction (I think that is the term) will reduce contrast and sharpness a bit.

So a small distance between your lens and fence, a lower fstop, and the farther distance of the subject from the fence (thus a longer FL) all come into play in making the fence disappear.

This was taken through a pretty dense fencing at the zoo. A longer focal length (287mm), not so open an aperture (f6.3), and I being close to the fencing made it disappear.

IMAGE: http://teamspeed.smugmug.com/Church-and-Family/Family-Zoo-Day/IMG4398/867850683_nPMWr-XL.jpg

Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeleFragger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 219
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Williamstown, NJ
     
Nov 28, 2010 11:10 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #9

well light was bright.. not sure why.. but i tried my 85mm as it is the only one that will go down in the 2's... but couldnt get pics that were not washed out...

gonna try photoshop to try and get them bright...

here is the bright...

then one that actually came out but fence was still there.. however i wasnt close enough to the fence...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse (external link)****RF-603 Discussion
Canon 7Dm2 Gripped | 32GB Transcend CF | 64GB Toshiba FlashAir | YN-468 Flash | YN-468 II Flash | RF-603 | EF-S 18-55 IS|EF 24-105L|EF 50 MKII 1.8|EF-S 55-250 IS |EF 85 1.8| Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC |Primo's Trigger Stick Monopod | Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod
if I post a pic.. it is there to be picked on... (I have thick skin.. im in IT)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LowriderS10
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,170 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South Korea / Canada
     
Nov 28, 2010 11:16 |  #10

you're way too far away from the fence...to make it disappear you have to be much, much closer to the fence than you are to the players. (In this picture it looks like the fence is way closer to the players than it is to you...that won't work)

Also, the D700 is a FF camera, whereas you're shooting a cropper...FFs have shallower DOFs. Equipment will play into this somewhat, but your technique needs work.


-=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=- (external link)
-=Facebook=- (external link)
-=Flickr=- (external link)

-=Gear=-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrgooch
Goldmember
Avatar
3,290 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 318
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Toms River NJ
     
Nov 28, 2010 11:23 as a reply to  @ LowriderS10's post |  #11

You should also be using manual focus or the fence will be in focus and not the subject.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LowriderS10
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,170 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South Korea / Canada
     
Nov 28, 2010 11:24 |  #12

Also, I'm not sure why they're washed out...even if you're shooting at f2.8 you could just speed up the shutter or lower the ISO...


-=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=- (external link)
-=Facebook=- (external link)
-=Flickr=- (external link)

-=Gear=-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LowriderS10
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,170 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South Korea / Canada
     
Nov 28, 2010 11:25 |  #13

mrgooch wrote in post #11358232 (external link)
You should also be using manual focus or the fence will be in focus and not the subject.

Well, looking at his example, it looks like the player is in focus, not the fence, so I don't think that's the problem...in my opinion, WHERE he is is the problem...


-=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=- (external link)
-=Facebook=- (external link)
-=Flickr=- (external link)

-=Gear=-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Nov 28, 2010 12:46 |  #14

Shallow DOF will make it so objects really close to you may not show up.

As long as you are close to the fence and focused on something not so close to the fence, it should not be too present in the photo.

Example, this was shot through a fence, no cropping or photoshop.

Shot at f8

IMAGE: http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/xx291/themadmanazn/chainfence-1.jpg

EDIT: the black stop in the lower right is a person, not part of the fence =)

Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
Avatar
4,652 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2006
Location: Channelview, Tx
     
Nov 28, 2010 13:02 |  #15

What you need to do is find a spot where you can put your lens as close to the fence as possible. When I shoot through the fence, I hold the lens hood to the fence so I am as close as possible and try to get the open part of the fence in the center of the lens. this has worked well with the 70-200, 100-400, 300 f/2.8, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 on any of the camera bodies I have owned.

Bottom line is, if you can't get close to the fence to shoot, you might as well just sit and watch the game.

Here are a few examples.
1)Pitcher (external link)

2) Pitcher #2 (external link). Night shot through the green netting.

3)T-Ball (external link)

4) Caleb rounding third (external link) - 70-200 f/2.8 Sigma lens.

Hope these examples help.
Mike


MaxPreps Profile (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,832 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
take pic and chainlink fence not show
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1040 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.