Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 27 Nov 2010 (Saturday) 11:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Copyright Issues

 
Noah212
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Connecticut
     
Nov 27, 2010 11:52 |  #1

How can the members on this forum post wonderful pictures without worrying about them being "stolen"? Lots of people post high resolution shots which could easily be taken and used by someone else. If someone could explain the reasoning behind this, that would be great. Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nate42nd
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: The Wild West
     
Nov 27, 2010 12:41 |  #2

This could be an issue. If we want our photos to be completely safe we really can't post them anywhere. We should also put watermarks on them if we do post them. I don't think most people consider their photos good enough for anyone to want....but some of them are.


7D - - 17-55 F/2.8 - 24-105 F/4L - 100mm F/2.8 - 50mm F/1.8 - S95 / To see all click here
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Nov 27, 2010 13:01 |  #3

The alternative is to not post photos at all, so if you want to share your images, get critiques or provide examples of techniques there is no choice but to post images. Can they be downloaded? Sure - will they be. It really depends, but as for me, it's an acceptable risk.


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Nov 27, 2010 13:45 |  #4

The reasoning? For me, it's easy: I'm an amateur. I don't care.

If someone downloads and prints one of my pics it's fine with me. If they claim it as their own I'll call them on it, though...

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isophotostudio
Senior Member
Avatar
494 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Akron, OH
     
Nov 27, 2010 17:17 |  #5

When I was working as a graphic designer I had someone bring in a photo to me that she wanted on her Christmas newsletter. I checked around on the internet to find the source, (it's generally very easy to tell when someone is trying to use a photo that they just "found"). The photo was from a photographer on this forum. Beautiful picture of bridges right after a snow fall. We contacted the person and tried to get a release, and ended up using a very poor quality stock photography photo instead. (Well not poor quality, but poorer composition and subject)


This is my camera, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
Canon 5D Mark 2/Gripped, Canon 7D, Canon 40D, Canon 28-135 f/3.5, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 30 f/1.4, Sigma 150 f 2.8, Sigma 24-70 f2.8
Alien Bee 800 & 400, 2 Dynaphos DP-2497

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Nov 27, 2010 17:32 |  #6

I don't consider the images I upload to the Web to be of good enough resolution to do much with aside from "personal use" -- in other words anything more than a screen display or a small print. I've had requests for uses that I've OK'd, but I've also been payed for more "serious" stuff where I've provided higher resolution files. To me, sharing images here and on my PBase site is part of the enjoyment of the hobby. For things of a more restricted use, well, I have password-protected galleries for that kind of thing.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Nov 27, 2010 18:01 |  #7

Noah212 wrote in post #11353732 (external link)
How can the members on this forum post wonderful pictures without worrying about them being "stolen"? Lots of people post high resolution shots which could easily be taken and used by someone else. If someone could explain the reasoning behind this, that would be great. Thanks.

Because I just don't care that much. If people want to grab some low res files from me off the internet it is not materially hurting me all that much. If I found someone stealing my work I would make them stop.

But to me sharing images and having fun with photography is why I do it. If I sat on everything I ever shot for fear of it being stolen online I think I'd lose some of my interest in photography.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkuenning
Goldmember
Avatar
1,507 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Claremont (near LA), California
     
Nov 28, 2010 06:33 |  #8

People tend to think single photos are worth far more than they really are. They hear about the one that went for $10K, or the one that earns $100/month from stock. Then they conclude that every half-decent photo is worth that.

I think I've posted exactly one photo on POTN that somebody else might want to print. As others have said, it's a low-res posting. Even if I did sell it, I doubt I'd get enough to stress about.

(I have had three shots from my general Web site published. One earned me money; the other two I gave away free because they were good causes. In all three cases, the people who used them contacted me for permission and high-resolution copies. Maybe there are more that I don't know about; again, I'm not stressing. I doubt that anybody has made thousands off me.)

(As a side comment, I'm responsible some open-source software that people have contacted me to ask if they could use it. The first time I think I asked $10K; I figured that any company could afford that. No sale. On subsequent contacts I kept dropping the price, never getting to agreement. Now that I know the true value, I just give it away.)


Geoff
All I want is a 10-2000 f/0.5L with no distortion that weighs 100 grams, fits in my pocket, and costs $300. Is that too much to ask?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

974 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Copyright Issues
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1701 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.