Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 27 Nov 2010 (Saturday) 21:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Should I consolidate my lens collection?

 
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Nov 28, 2010 09:56 |  #16

Sell the 35L, 135L and 300/4L

Get a 100-400L and a 24-70L.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JelleVerherstraeten
Goldmember
Avatar
2,440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
     
Nov 28, 2010 10:37 |  #17

Samyang 14mm + 35L + 70-200mmMKII + 2x extender


-Jelle l Gear l Website (external link) l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,328 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2516
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Nov 28, 2010 12:05 as a reply to  @ post 11357784 |  #18

I seldom get rid of lenses...

As you see from my gear list, I am not a minimalist. However the three lenses I got rid of were the 17-40L which I never liked, the Canon 20mm f/2.8 which my 17-55mm made totally redundant and the 400mm f/5.6 Tokina which had nice IQ but, slow autofocus which tended to hunt.

I will probably sell my 50mm f/1.8 Mark-I lens since I have seldom, if ever, used it after buying the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS which I consider a better low light lens.

I COULD sell my 24-70mm f/2.8L since the 17-55mm has pretty well replaced it for gneeral and travel use. However I do love the "brick" for studio work.

If I were a total minimalist, I could exist with my 17-55mm f/2.8L and 70-200mm f/4L IS lenses and 1.4x TC. But, I tend to be a packrat.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skater911
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,281 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 28, 2010 14:20 |  #19

sierra trekker wrote in post #11357784 (external link)
You need a 50 f1.2..............ever​yone with a ff camera should have a "normal" lens. I use mine for over 80% of my shots. Depending upon what you use the 35 and 135 for, I might think about dumping them and getting a 70-200 f2.8 IS II. The 50 can easily take the place of the 35 with a little bit of footwork and the 135, although a great lens is somewhat of a singular use lens. In the end its all about what you use the lenses for, not having an arsenal that covers all of the focal lengths.


Would you say (focal length aside) the 50 1.2 is a better lens than the 35L? I have heard the issues with softness and focus shift, but have never used one before. At this time the 300 will go for sure and the 135L is still questionable. This is kinda what I was thinking

17-40,)either keep the 35 or sell and get a 50 or an 85 for walk around/low light), 100-400 This would get me from 17-400 with just a few lens. My biggest issue is that I get lens envy and bam a new lens is on it's way and then I use it a few times and then it sits. At this point I think the 17-40 and 100-400 would get the most use as I spend my time either doing landscape or wildlife, then lastly would be either low light or my kids candid portraits. Thanks for all of the suggestions, they have been helpful and not so helpful (meaning just makes me want to buy more and not get rid of any. :))


Nikon D850 l Nikon 28 1.4E l Nikon 50 1.8 g l Nikon 24-120 F4 l Tamron 100-400 l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
riverdog1
Senior Member
335 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Nov 28, 2010 17:00 |  #20

skater911 wrote in post #11356285 (external link)
I am really starting to get into landscape, but I also really like wildlife as well.

maybe drop the 135L and 300 and get the new 70-300L


Thought about this one too, but since it was so new I hadn't heard much about it and it is just a tad too short I think.

The 300/4 has a short MFD making it great for butterflies, dragonflies etc. If you are getting more interested in wildlife you may find this option of shooting a perched bird then getting close on an insect for example, to be a great advantage of this lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
plasticmotif
Goldmember
Avatar
3,174 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Tennessee
     
Nov 28, 2010 17:53 |  #21

17-40, 35L, 100 macro and 100-400 would be a nice consolidated kit for you.


Mac P.
My Zenfolio (external link) My Photo Blog (external link) My Equipment
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=14172975#po​st14172975

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sierra ­ trekker
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Nov 28, 2010 23:31 |  #22

Would you say (focal length aside) the 50 1.2 is a better lens than the 35L? I have heard the issues with softness and focus shift, but have never used one before.

Put it this way, I've had jsut one copy of a 50 1.2 whereas I've purchased and sold at least and maybe three copies of the 35L. To me it is just a better all around lens, particularly of a FF camera. I also don't think that the 85 would be a good walk-around lens. I have an 85L and it is more of a specialty lens...........and it is very special. On the 50 1.2, I never experienced the so called problems the various forums are full of. Then again I'm not much of a pixel peeper and all of the fucusing errors that I have experienced were user error.

I'm not sure what kind of wildlfe you pursue and the 100-400 would probably work out OK. One other option you might want to think about is to buy one of the new 70-200 f2.8 IS II and use one of the new extender IIIs on it to get that greater reach. It would give you more flexibility than just having a bigger slower 100-400.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hhuy888
Goldmember
Avatar
1,002 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
     
Nov 29, 2010 00:44 |  #23

Your list is not even long to consolidate, that is just me. But everyone is different and maybe you are lucky that you don't have the lens collecting obsession like many of us.

My opinion is:

Only keep what you need.

If you: " ... really don't know what to do about the 35L and 135L ...". Then just sell them and also sell the 300m to buy the 100-400 as you wish.

The extra money you get from selling the lenses you can use to take a nice vacation somewhere exotic to take photos.


hhuy
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jannie
Goldmember
4,936 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Nov 29, 2010 00:57 |  #24

Why do I not see anything in the way of a list of gear in his signature, do I have something set wrong,


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,704 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Should I consolidate my lens collection?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1252 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.