CiM_Photography wrote in post #14891432
I'm not trying to be a jerk, David - I enjoy your work and I respect other photographers regardless of their experience level (which you have much more than I) and I don't consider myself a pro by any means at this point.
That said, the above image could have been attained with (2) YN-560's connected to Cactus V5's and shot through a softbox/softlighter + reflector for balance. There's no obvious hairlighting, and in a studio environment the Einstein power is ill-utilized.
No worries about honest comments.
I have 3 YN-560s that I use often for table top product work. I also have 3 600EX-RTs I use for weddings and with the 560s for small setups
The power range the Einsteins offer is from 2.5Ws to 640Ws in 1/10 stop increments. That level of control is important when balancing light in a studio situation.
You're right about not needing the power, I think the lights in this shot were all well below 1/4 power. The background lights were the hottest. So that they could make it clipped white if desired.
The main and fill lights were in big PLMs. The main was a silver with diffusion panel. I have tested speedlites in the PLM and with careful positioning they fill even the big one and deliver reasonable light to a subject within 6 feet which is were I tend to have them even with a Einstein.
One significant advantage the Einsteins offer in a studio situation is the remote control for setting power via the Cyber Commander. For a setup like this, I set the background lights for evenness, then power them so they deliver F11 at the subject position (reading the white paper as a light source with an incident meter). Then set the main also at F11 at the subject position. Then set the fill usually about F8 so I have a three to one ratio. Then add the hair light and have it about F5.6 at the subject position. (You're right about the hair light. Its really not evident in this shot.) Once the lighting is set the way I want it ratio-wise. I change the CC to group. Now I can take a reading at subject position toward the camera to get a base exposure. Usually its about F11.5 given the above settings. Now, in group setting I can back off the exposure to whatever I want and all the lights change power together, keeping the ratios consistent.
And, if I want really shallow DoF, I can easily power the lights down even more while keeping the ratios in tact. The same can be accomplished with ABs and the Plus Cyber Syncs. There is no way that can be accomplished with YN-560s. It can be accomplished on a light by light basis with the 600EX-RTs from the camera but no way to change power on all the lights uniformly. (At least none that I've figured out so far with my 5DIII.
You're right that its possible to get essentially the same lighting scheme with other lights and modifiers, but not nearly as easily. And, to make a point about modifier influence, a soft box or umbrella on the main and fill would not have delivered the subtle but defined shadow from the model's nose that the silver PLM delivers with a diffusion panel.