Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Dec 2010 (Thursday) 20:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yet another crop vs FF factor.

 
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 02, 2010 21:31 |  #16

subpixel wrote in post #11385966 (external link)
How can they not change, the example I gave of focal length is right, 17-55mm is 27-88mm in crop, and that is a fact.

It appears that you have misunderstood what you have read, because the above is NOT fact.

The truth is that the field (angle) of view provided by a 17-55mm lens on an APS-C format (often referred to here as a "1.6 crop" format) camera would be the same as a 27.2-88mm lens on a 35mm film format camera.

The only things that change when you put a given lens on different format cameras are the field (angle) of view and (because of the difference in the camera format) depth of field at identical aperture settings.

Read my article in your linked thread very carefully after you throw out what you "know" already. Lots of people have learned from it.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RTPVid
Goldmember
3,365 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2010
Location: MN
     
Dec 02, 2010 21:35 |  #17

The focal length of a lens is a measurement of the distance from the rear nodal point of the lens to the point where the subject is in focus when the subject is at infinity. A lens with a 100mm focal length will be a 100 mm lens whether it is mounted on a crop body, a FF body, a medium format body, or a view camera, or just sitting on your desk. It is a measurement of the lens itself, and has no interaction with what, if anything, it is mounted on.

Perhaps it would be better if you thought of the so-called "effective" focal length for what it really is: a cropping of the image projected by the lens.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
subpixel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
109 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 209
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Stuttgart, Germany.
     
Dec 02, 2010 21:37 as a reply to  @ RTPVid's post |  #18

Thanks guys, my confusion is cleared :)
SkipD: very informative post on crop on the other link, thanks.


David.
Canon EOS-R5 | Canon TS-E 24 L II | Canon 24-70 F2.8L II | Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L II | Canon RF 50 1.2L
Follow me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Dec 02, 2010 22:05 |  #19

I'm not sure if this was covered.
The "aperture" changes when a TC is used because it is not really aperture at all. It is "F ratio", as I defined earlier. If you change the focal length (with a TC) and keep the entrance pupil the same (since it's the same lens), the F ratio (or "aperture") must necessarily change.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
subpixel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
109 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 209
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Stuttgart, Germany.
     
Dec 02, 2010 22:25 |  #20

xarqi wrote in post #11386249 (external link)
I'm not sure if this was covered.
The "aperture" changes when a TC is used because it is not really aperture at all. It is "F ratio", as I defined earlier. If you change the focal length (with a TC) and keep the entrance pupil the same (since it's the same lens), the F ratio (or "aperture") must necessarily change.

That's what I thought that happened with the crop cameras :)


David.
Canon EOS-R5 | Canon TS-E 24 L II | Canon 24-70 F2.8L II | Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L II | Canon RF 50 1.2L
Follow me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Dec 02, 2010 22:30 |  #21

subpixel wrote in post #11386343 (external link)
That's what I thought that happened with the crop cameras :)

Hopefully you now understand that focal length of a lens does not change when it is moved to different format cameras. Thus the f-stop values also remain the same as the lens is moved from one format camera to another.

It's amazing how often we hear that camera sales people fed the buyers with the BS about a lens' focal length changing when used on different format cameras.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
subpixel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
109 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 209
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Stuttgart, Germany.
     
Dec 02, 2010 22:33 |  #22

SkipD wrote in post #11386372 (external link)
Hopefully you now understand that focal length of a lens does not change when it is moved to different format cameras. Thus the f-stop values also remain the same as the lens is moved from one format camera to another.

It's amazing how often we hear that camera sales people fed the buyers with the BS about a lens' focal length changing when used on different format cameras.

It's easy for misinformed people to fell for that one, just like I was.


David.
Canon EOS-R5 | Canon TS-E 24 L II | Canon 24-70 F2.8L II | Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L II | Canon RF 50 1.2L
Follow me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Dec 02, 2010 22:43 |  #23

xarqi wrote in post #11386249 (external link)
I'm not sure if this was covered.
The "aperture" changes when a TC is used because it is not really aperture at all. It is "F ratio", as I defined earlier. If you change the focal length (with a TC) and keep the entrance pupil the same (since it's the same lens), the F ratio (or "aperture") must necessarily change.

Yep.

When the spec of a lens is given, the aperture is given using an "f/<number>" nomenclature. Ever wonder why that is?

It's because the "f" in that nomenclature stands for the focal length of the lens! The aperture of the lens is being given in terms of the focal length. If you have an f/2.8 lens, the actual diameter of the aperture is the lens' focal length divided by 2.8. If it's a "fixed aperture" zoom lens (which just means the ratio remains constant), then the diameter of the aperture changes as you change the focal length. This is one reason the cheapest zoom lenses tend to have "variable" apertures: the diameter of the aperture doesn't have to be as tightly controlled as a function of focal length.

This is also why when you change the aperture value (the focal length divided by the aperture diameter) to change the light by a stop, which is a factor of two, you don't change the f-stop value by a factor of two, you change it by a factor of the square root of two -- the amount of light being let in by the aperture is directly proportional to its area, not its diameter. It's directly proportional to the square of its diameter. If you were to double the diameter of the aperture, you'd be increasing the amount of light being let in by a factor of four, or two stops. Put another way, the diameter of the aperture is proportional to the square root of the amount of light being let in. Double the amount of light, and you have to increase (multiply) the aperture diameter by a factor of the square root of two. Halve the amount of light, and you have to decrease (divide) the aperture by a factor of the square root of two.

That relationship is why the f-stop numbers change by a square root of two per stop of light controlled.


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 03, 2010 00:36 |  #24

subpixel wrote in post #11385966 (external link)
How can they not change, the example I gave of focal length is right, 17-55mm is 27-88mm in crop, and that is a fact.
Crop factor thread:
https://photography-on-the.net …487&highlight=c​rop+factor

The 17-55mm lens on APS-C has the same AOV in its 15x22mm frame as provided by a 27-88mm lens in the 24mmx36mm FF frame. But it is a 17-55mm lens. period, end of sentence, end of paragraph

The crop factor is useful only to someone who has used FF, and resultantly knows the AOV which is achieved with different lenses, so that when they pick up the APS-C camera they know what FL to use to get the equivalent AOV. If you have no experience with FF, the crop factor of 1.6 is a totally meaningless and useless number.

Due to the smaller format size and the use of a shorter FL to achieve the same angle of view, at the same shooting aperture the DOF of the smaller format is deeper than with a larger format. One would need to shoot at about 1.5EV larger aperture size with APS-C to equal the DOF of the larger format FF camera.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,146 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Yet another crop vs FF factor.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1644 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.