Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 04 Dec 2010 (Saturday) 09:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rechargeable AA's

 
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4541
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:28 |  #16

cdifoto wrote in post #11394658 (external link)
We carry all those dSLR bodies, lenses, flashes, and doodads but we're **** about a few pounds in batteries? Seriously?

Not even one pound... 4 AA NiMH cells only weigh 3.75 oz, 16 of them less than one pound. The beloved BG-E2 empty (no batteries) weighs more!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmurphy
Member
40 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:30 |  #17

cdifoto wrote in post #11394658 (external link)
We carry all those dSLR bodies, lenses, flashes, and doodads but we're **** about a few pounds in batteries? Seriously?

Not the weight, but my experience with NiMH has been a case of pretty bad falloff in recycle time.

In other words, they work great, and then - splat - down to nothing.

With the Lithiums (Not Li Ion - as I said, not looking at rechargeables here), I've had great - OUTSTANDING - performance without the severe dropoff. They've gotten me through shooting where I'd have had to change the NiMH's two, three, or even four times.


Canon EOS 7D / EF 24-105 f/4 L / EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 / EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 / EF 50 f/1.8 / SpeedLite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:32 |  #18

Wilt wrote in post #11394711 (external link)
Not even one pound... 4 AA NiMH cells only weigh 3.75 oz, 16 of them less than one pound. The beloved BG-E2 empty weighs more!

Thanks. I never weighed them. haha. Sooooo it's even more silly. :D


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmurphy
Member
40 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:34 |  #19

cdifoto wrote in post #11394733 (external link)
Thanks. I never weighed them. haha. Sooooo it's even more silly. :D

I didn't mean 'weight' per say when I said 'weigh myself down' with them, but as in, more crap to cram in the bag, dig out, change and try to keep shooting.

The batteries weigh about the same as my sto-fen, so actual poundage is not much of an issue ;)


Canon EOS 7D / EF 24-105 f/4 L / EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 / EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 / EF 50 f/1.8 / SpeedLite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4541
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:35 |  #20

dmurphy wrote in post #11394723 (external link)
Not the weight, but my experience with NiMH has been a case of pretty bad falloff in recycle time.

Well, you did a pretty good job of convincing us that your concern was, "I'd rather spend a few $$ on 2 sets of these than weigh myself down with 16 rechargeables." :)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:36 |  #21

dmurphy wrote in post #11394723 (external link)
Not the weight, but my experience with NiMH has been a case of pretty bad falloff in recycle time.

In other words, they work great, and then - splat - down to nothing.

With the Lithiums (Not Li Ion - as I said, not looking at rechargeables here), I've had great - OUTSTANDING - performance without the severe dropoff. They've gotten me through shooting where I'd have had to change the NiMH's two, three, or even four times.

Yeah but when your Lithiums are - splat - down to nothing you have to pitch them in the trash. The same set of rechargeable are good for several years before they finally need replaced altogether.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmurphy
Member
40 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:39 |  #22

Wilt wrote in post #11394746 (external link)
Well, you did a pretty good job of convincing us that your concern was, "I'd rather spend a few $$ on 2 sets of these than weigh myself down with 16 rechargeables." :)

My apologies; wording was bad. I meant finding a spot in the bag for them and fumbling around to find 'em when I'm in a hurry. Battery poundage is white noise when compared to carrying around a 7D + a few L lenses ...

Been there, done that, decided to go the Lithium route instead. Besides which, I'm really bad about having a regimen to ensure all the batts are 'topped off' before I go out for a shoot.

I have a whole pile of Rayovac NiMH rechargeables that I picked up a while ago. They're 2300mAh batts, so they have a decent life when used right after topping off. Wait a few days, and they're dead as a doornail ...

The Lithiums just fit my personal workflow better. Your mileage may vary. Batteries not included. Packaged by weight, not volume. Contents may settle during shipping. As seen on TV. So on, and so forth ;-)a


Canon EOS 7D / EF 24-105 f/4 L / EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 / EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 / EF 50 f/1.8 / SpeedLite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:41 |  #23

dmurphy wrote in post #11394742 (external link)
I didn't mean 'weight' per say when I said 'weigh myself down' with them, but as in, more crap to cram in the bag, dig out, change and try to keep shooting.

The batteries weigh about the same as my sto-fen, so actual poundage is not much of an issue ;)

Kind of makes sense, but keeping the spares in a dedicated pocket isn't difficult and mitigates the "cram in the bag" and "dig out" issues. Changing them takes mere seconds so that can't really be a problem. If you're shooting weddings, surely you know how to manage your time.

At any rate, whatever works works. I'm just too cheap to buy new sets of batteries for each and every gig.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:43 |  #24

dmurphy wrote in post #11394769 (external link)
I have a whole pile of Rayovac NiMH rechargeables that I picked up a while ago. They're 2300mAh batts, so they have a decent life when used right after topping off. Wait a few days, and they're dead as a doornail ...

Ahhh that explains your hatred. I had that same brand and I can surely attest that they're garbage. Same goes for Duracell NiMH. Low discharge NiMH (eneloop and Duracell Precharged type) and NiZn do not suffer from the same problems.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4541
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:43 |  #25

Lithium: Best price I found was $1 each, more typical to get them for $2 each...as expensive for one-time use as for buying NiMH rechargeables. As a said earlier, great for 'emergency use' where the battery might sit for years before being called upon to provide reliable power.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4541
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:46 |  #26

dmurphy wrote in post #11394769 (external link)
I have a whole pile of Rayovac NiMH rechargeables that I picked up a while ago. They're 2300mAh batts, so they have a decent life when used right after topping off. Wait a few days, and they're dead as a doornail ...

That is a horrendous lack of shelf time, if only a few days have passed. They should last 90 days before going flat! Boy, let that be a lesson to everyone, to never buy Rayovac NiMH. You probably killed them with the Rayovac rapid charger.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmurphy
Member
40 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Dec 04, 2010 13:58 |  #27

Wilt wrote in post #11394812 (external link)
That is a horrendous lack of shelf time, if only a few days have passed. They should last 90 days before going flat! Boy, let that be a lesson to everyone, to never buy Rayovac NiMH. You probably killed them with the Rayovac rapid charger.

Yeah, they've been thoroughly awful to be honest.

I bought into the whole Rayovac "I-C3" system which was supposed to do intelligent charging, high output batteries, etc. Someone gave me the charger as a gift and I (as a fool) picked up a 24-pack of AA's for it.

And, they suck.

Been hesitant to make another major investment in a whole 'nother technology - this one cost me enough. I paid a premium for the I-C3's because they were supposed to be a superior technology.

Shelf life's been terrible. I can't even get a week out of my Apple Mighty Mouse with them.

Having said all of that ... it sounds like most everyone here is sold on the Eneloops. Is there any particular sub-brand or sub-model of Eneloop that is highest recommended?

I'd be willing to give it another go, but definitely not with the Rayovac's again!

EDIT: Penny wise, pound foolish, right? I have no problem dropping $1k on a lens, but agonize over $50 in rechargeable batteries. Weird how the brain works ...


Canon EOS 7D / EF 24-105 f/4 L / EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 / EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 / EF 50 f/1.8 / SpeedLite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Dec 04, 2010 14:11 |  #28

dmurphy wrote in post #11394869 (external link)
Yeah, they've been thoroughly awful to be honest.

I bought into the whole Rayovac "I-C3" system which was supposed to do intelligent charging, high output batteries, etc. Someone gave me the charger as a gift and I (as a fool) picked up a 24-pack of AA's for it.

And, they suck.

Been hesitant to make another major investment in a whole 'nother technology - this one cost me enough. I paid a premium for the I-C3's because they were supposed to be a superior technology.

Shelf life's been terrible. I can't even get a week out of my Apple Mighty Mouse with them.

Having said all of that ... it sounds like most everyone here is sold on the Eneloops. Is there any particular sub-brand or sub-model of Eneloop that is highest recommended?

I'd be willing to give it another go, but definitely not with the Rayovac's again!

EDIT: Penny wise, pound foolish, right? I have no problem dropping $1k on a lens, but agonize over $50 in rechargeable batteries. Weird how the brain works ...

Eneloop is just eneloop. There aren't any subsets/models.

Same goes for PowerGenix NiZn. PowerGenix is the brand and NiZn is the chemistry (Nickel Zinc).


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dithiolium
Senior Member
697 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Singapore
     
Dec 04, 2010 23:45 |  #29

Older eneloop is rated 1000 recharge cycles. Newer eneloop is rated 1500 recharge cycles. capacity rating is the same.

I have used eneloops and imedions over the past 3 years. When still new, both perform similarly.
After several years usage, the imedions cannot hold V at rated, flash recharge takes very long. Whereas the eneloops still perform same as day 1.

Have since replaced all AA to eneloop. Charger i use Maha MH-C800s. For long events I add a CP-E4 battery pack. Or you can get a Quantum.

Always have a spare set of regular AA as last resort backup.


Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis of a government
Gear List / Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Dec 05, 2010 00:01 |  #30

Wilt wrote in post #11394657 (external link)
NiZn is coming into increasing presence, offer 1.6v output, but must be charged only in special NiZn chargers.

There is a thread here (sorry but don't have the link) about the higher voltage (1.65) of the NiZ batteries frying the flash. Apparently the voltage is too high. The problem occurs when there are several flashes in a short span.


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,263 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Rechargeable AA's
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1238 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.