PS CS4 or Lr?
Do most people just stick to one?
For the purpose of retouching and resizing etc.
gabers99 Member 118 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info | Dec 04, 2010 14:07 | #1 PS CS4 or Lr? Canon 5D Mk II - 24-105 L - 85 1.8 - EX 580 II - LEE Filters
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 04, 2010 14:59 | #2 It depends on the level of editing you want to do and what you're comfortable with. Each program will do many of the same things. I use both, but LR gets the bulk of the workload because I like the cataloging features and I hate Bridge. But from there I do all of my exposure adjustments, sharpening, noise reduction, etc. Then if I need to do some more detailed touch up work I'll move to photoshop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Dec 04, 2010 15:06 | #3 Power is subjective. But Photoshop allows you to do things that light room does not so if you were only to choose one it would probably be PS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Damo77 Goldmember 4,699 posts Likes: 115 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Brisbane, Australia More info | Dec 04, 2010 15:15 | #4 |
czynot Member 198 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | +1 on Photoshop. 5D MKII, 24-70mm L, 18-55mm IS,70-200mm 2.8L IS, 50mm 1.8, 100mm Macro, 2-580EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssim POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005 10,884 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2003 Location: southern Alberta, Canada More info | Its really not a fair comparison, while they do share some commonality they are two different beasts. They both share the same RAW engine and the only difference being the UI. My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Dec 04, 2010 17:25 | #7 You do hear a lot about Lightroom because it does so much of what photographers need that it is often all that is needed. This was, in fact, the intent of the Lightroom design -- to provide an integrated interface for photographers that combined tools for development, organizing/managing, and various types of output for our photography so that we could get a whole lot done in efficient ways. There are other Raw processors out there with great capabilities as well in various areas, but the only one that I know of that actually rivals the "all in one" design of Lightoom is Aperture. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 05, 2010 20:07 | #8 I love PS. but think you can work faster on Light room. If you take good exposures from the begning then you will spend less time in either program. You will spend time improving on your photos instead of correcting your exposures.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1254 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||