Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Dec 2010 (Saturday) 14:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which is more powerful..

 
gabers99
Member
118 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Dec 04, 2010 14:07 |  #1

PS CS4 or Lr?

Do most people just stick to one?

For the purpose of retouching and resizing etc.


Canon 5D Mk II - 24-105 L - 85 1.8 - EX 580 II - LEE Filters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marubozo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,471 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 40
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Dec 04, 2010 14:59 |  #2

It depends on the level of editing you want to do and what you're comfortable with. Each program will do many of the same things. I use both, but LR gets the bulk of the workload because I like the cataloging features and I hate Bridge. But from there I do all of my exposure adjustments, sharpening, noise reduction, etc. Then if I need to do some more detailed touch up work I'll move to photoshop.



flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 04, 2010 15:06 |  #3

Power is subjective. But Photoshop allows you to do things that light room does not so if you were only to choose one it would probably be PS.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Dec 04, 2010 15:15 |  #4

If you could only have one, it would have to be Photoshop.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
czynot
Member
198 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Dec 04, 2010 16:14 as a reply to  @ Damo77's post |  #5

+1 on Photoshop.
Unless $$ is the issue and minor/basic adjustment than LR. Otherwise Nothing can beat PS.


5D MKII, 24-70mm L, 18-55mm IS,70-200mm 2.8L IS, 50mm 1.8, 100mm Macro, 2-580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Dec 04, 2010 16:28 as a reply to  @ czynot's post |  #6

Its really not a fair comparison, while they do share some commonality they are two different beasts. They both share the same RAW engine and the only difference being the UI.

If by powerful you are referring to getting the most out of it, I would go with Photoshop. It can do alot of what LR can't as far as image editing. LR is more of a workflow tool that does some image editing. Everyone should catalog their files and this is where LR can shine though there are many catalog programs around. You can keyword and fill in alot of the IPTC fields via Bridge but that is all you are doing, populating the fields with no database behind it to support future searches. I don't mind Bridge as a file browser and it certainly has improved over the last couple of releases. Lightroom is where this really proves it worth. I can easily find a shot that I did a couple of years ago, assuming of course I did the key wording and such at the time I processed them.

If all a person is doing is some exposure and sharpening to their images then LR will work just fine but if one wants to go further and use the power of layers and the multitude of other pixel based editing then Photoshop is the tool to use. It is really a matter of personal choice and there is no right or wrong answer to this question.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 04, 2010 17:25 |  #7

You do hear a lot about Lightroom because it does so much of what photographers need that it is often all that is needed. This was, in fact, the intent of the Lightroom design -- to provide an integrated interface for photographers that combined tools for development, organizing/managing, and various types of output for our photography so that we could get a whole lot done in efficient ways. There are other Raw processors out there with great capabilities as well in various areas, but the only one that I know of that actually rivals the "all in one" design of Lightoom is Aperture.

But, there is one thing that users of Lightroom, Aperture, DPP and other Raw processors tend to have in common, and that is a capable "image editor", meaning an app like Photoshop, Elements, or, say, Gimp that has the featured for the more powerful and sophisticated ways of "manipulating" your images. There are, simply, times when a Raw processor is not enough, although the advanced capabilities of Lightroom and Aperture (and I'm hearing good things about the newer Capture 1 stuff) make more things possible with Raw processing than ever before.

It should also be noted that a current release of Photoshop CS has a matching Raw processor, Adobe Raw, with the same tools and capabilities as the Lightroom Raw processor so that if you have, say, CS5, you get everything that LR3 has for Raw processing. And, the latest update for the CS4 Camera Raw which is, I believe, 5.7, is not far behind.

So, for "one thing to do everything" Photoshop is still the champ, but for "one thing does most of everything in a well-integrated and efficient way", well, there is a reason why Lightroom has become a "tool of choice" for so many of us:)!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jay25
Member
214 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 248
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Loganville Georgia
     
Dec 05, 2010 20:07 |  #8

I love PS. but think you can work faster on Light room. If you take good exposures from the begning then you will spend less time in either program. You will spend time improving on your photos instead of correcting your exposures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,587 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Which is more powerful..
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1254 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.