I wouldn't worry too much about this thread being drawn out. It gives everyone something to think about, both sides of an argument, and we all learn something from it. Time well spent, IMO.
suecassidy Goldmember  4,102 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 Location: Huntington Beach California More info | Dec 06, 2010 13:45 | #61 I wouldn't worry too much about this thread being drawn out. It gives everyone something to think about, both sides of an argument, and we all learn something from it. Time well spent, IMO. Sue Cassidy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saturnin Goldmember 1,987 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2006 Location: vancouver, BC More info | Dec 06, 2010 14:42 | #62  Permanent banwhat did you learn suecassidy? http://www.saturninfloyd.tumblr.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sspellman Goldmember  1,731 posts Likes: 30 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Detroit, Michigan More info | Dec 06, 2010 16:43 | #63 RDKirk wrote in post #11403798  I don't do "nightclub photography" and don't have any understanding of the market. Who, exactly, is the market? If the market is the patronage of the club, then it seems to me that that a photographer would never want a to show a "compromising" image in his portfolio--that "market" would not be served by a photographer who was as likely to harm them as not. If the market is editorial, then perhaps anything would go...but clearly to me, the same portfolio can't be used in both markets, and a Facebook portfolio is to the patron market, not to the editorial market. The market for me is the club owners, national and local magazines, and nightlife websites that print pictures of hotties and club events. Every nightclub website I know takes down photos on request. I'm not sure why the OP was taking pictures. ScottSpellmanMedia.com [photography]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chakalakasp Senior Member 809 posts Likes: 9 Joined Jun 2006 More info | Dec 06, 2010 16:50 | #64 saturnin wrote in post #11404734 ya ya.. u are the better man..bla bla bla.... so u going to bend over like this for anyone who doesnt like a photo you take... good job... i'm just saying... because you know.. English, do you speak it? Ryan McGinnis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
enrigonz Goldmember  1,637 posts Likes: 10 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Miami, FL More info | Dec 06, 2010 17:28 | #65 chakalakasp wrote in post #11405999 English, do you speak it?
Canon Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TGrundvig Goldmember  2,876 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Dec 06, 2010 17:48 | #66 chakalakasp wrote in post #11405999 English, do you speak it?
1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saturnin Goldmember 1,987 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2006 Location: vancouver, BC More info | Dec 06, 2010 17:53 | #67 Permanent bani don't, and? chakalakasp wrote in post #11405999 English, do you speak it? http://www.saturninfloyd.tumblr.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed."  More info | Dec 06, 2010 17:56 | #68 sspellman wrote in post #11405964 The market for me is the club owners, national and local magazines, and nightlife websites that print pictures of hotties and club events. Every nightclub website I know takes down photos on request. Okay. I couldn't really see how any market except the strictly editorial would be served by antagonizing people. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 06, 2010 18:14 | #69 StellaBlue71 wrote in post #11403889 This thread and picture should both be burned. What's wrong with the thread? Website: Iowa Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MJPhotos24 Cream of the Crop  5,619 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Attica, NY / Parrish, FL More info | Dec 06, 2010 23:42 | #70 photoguy6405 wrote in post #11406485 What's wrong with the thread? There's big bad meanies in it who disagree! Freelance Photographer & Co-founder of Four Seam Images
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CALImagery Goldmember  3,375 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: O-H More info | Dec 07, 2010 00:23 | #71 sandpiper wrote in post #11401090 I disagree. The actual picture is unnecessary. The discussion is about whether to display a picture that someone doesn't want online and has requested to be taken down, to avoid embarrasment. Given the circumstances, I don't see why the picture should get further publication and display, just to satisfy your desire to see it. I was mostly being facetious, but had a curiosity of it. Christian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2010 00:24 | #72 MJPhotos24 wrote in post #11408182 There's big bad meanies in it who disagree!
Website: Iowa Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SMP_Homer Cream of the Crop  More info | Dec 07, 2010 11:26 | #73 72 posts - not a single picture... EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TattooedAffliction THREAD STARTER Senior Member  264 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Pennsylvania More info | Dec 07, 2010 11:33 | #74 SMP_Homer wrote in post #11410601 72 posts - not a single picture... Here ya go. While it's not the photo in question, it is one of two girls kissing that I shot this past Saturday at the same place, and I know both of these girls personally, so they won't care if it's posted
Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saturnin Goldmember 1,987 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2006 Location: vancouver, BC More info | Dec 07, 2010 12:29 | #75 Permanent bani thought u said the photo was good? (i realize this is not the one) but if the other looks like this...i wouldnt have even put it up..... lol, nevermind if its two supermodels making out... photo is plain as burnt toast... its not sexy, fun or anything really... looks very uncomfortable actually... http://www.saturninfloyd.tumblr.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2585 guests, 94 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
