Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 07 Dec 2010 (Tuesday) 09:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1st wedding! Light modifier question...

 
puggle
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
     
Dec 07, 2010 09:34 |  #1

Hi,

I'm excited to shoot my first wedding next July!

I'm curious to know if most of you use umbrella's with your off-camera flash, or if you use a softbox.

I'm most likely going to use a collapsible umbrella, but I also own a Westcott Asymetric softbox, designed by Bruce Dorn.

Here it is: http://****/gTpbiy (external link)

It's great for control, for one or two people, and I've used it quite a bit for portraits with great results. Just not sure if it's going to work well because it's bulky to carry. I would attach it to a monopod and have an assistant hand hold.

So, what say you?

Umbrella or soft box?

Thanks in advance for your advice.


Puggle
---------
Canon 1DXmkII, 5DmkIV, Sony A7rII, PhaseOne XF IQ100, PhaseOne 645DF+D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Dec 07, 2010 09:49 |  #2

I've never really found the portability and ease of set-up/take-down for flash soft boxes to be acceptable (at least not for me and how I pack and work). Especially not compared to umbrellas.

I use a 22" white shoot-through, 22" reflective silver, and a folding 36" that Ziser markets. They all do a pretty good job but the white 22" is my favorite. It's very light and portable, cheap (I picked it up used off eBay for $12), and for all but large groups it seems to do just as good a job as the 36".


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimconnerphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,177 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Southern California
     
Dec 07, 2010 10:08 |  #3

I use an Apollo 28" soft box. Almost as fast as an umbrella and catches less wind.


Wedding and Portraits www.jimconnerphoto.com (external link)
Commercial Work www.jamesdconner.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
puggle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
     
Dec 07, 2010 10:26 |  #4

Thanks!

I like both suggestions!

I'm familiar with David Ziser and his collapsible "Zumbrella", and I will most likely order one or two.

The softbox outside in wind sure does make good sense to!

The larger lastolite looks good.

Thank you!!


Puggle
---------
Canon 1DXmkII, 5DmkIV, Sony A7rII, PhaseOne XF IQ100, PhaseOne 645DF+D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 07, 2010 15:01 |  #5

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=646469

For a first wedding I think you'll have other things to worry about, like the pressure and speed of the day. Make sure you have an assistant who can at least help with gear, and maybe help with off camera flash. Only do OCF if you know it back to front, because on a wedding day the pressure makes everything more difficult.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Philco
Senior Member
Avatar
940 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2005
Location: SandyEggo, CA.
     
Dec 07, 2010 22:38 |  #6

I used softboxes for a long time, but eventually it just became a lot quicker and easier to carry a big, white shoot-through umbrella, which gets the job done about as well. If I had to shoot in a place where spill was a problem, I would still bring a softbox, though nowadays the softlighter II is my first choice 99% of the time since it's a best-of-both-worlds solution for me.


Canon 5D MKIII/Canon 5D MKII/ 70-200 F2.8 IS L / 24-70 F2.8L / 85 F1.2L II/ 35 f1.4L / 135 F2.0L / Canon 600 EX-RT X 2

[SIZE=1]r follow me on Facebook. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Valjoy
Senior Member
459 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Australia
     
Dec 07, 2010 23:41 |  #7

I have carted OCF gear around in my car for many of my weddings and I am yet to actually have the oppotunity to use it.

I have found that most , if not all of my weddings, time is the biggest issue I face. Everything is so fast paced ..... thinking and decision making , coping with time management plans (that dont go to plan ) all contribute to what you can achieve on the day.

If you get the chance to use it on the day ...that is great. Just have a secondary plan in case things dont run quite so smoothly.
You will learn a great deal from your 1st wedding.
Good luck , and let us know how you get on .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
puggle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
     
Dec 08, 2010 08:01 |  #8

Thanks! Yes, I'm bringing an assistant who has shot many weddings and he's very experienced. I've been studying David Ziser's books and watching all the videos on Kelby training for weddings. I'm a huge fan of Cliff Mautner's wedding photography to.

I'll be as prepared as I possibly can. I always jump into knew endeavors with two feet. So far, I'm planning to use OCF for candid's, and I'll use my Alien Bees for large group shots.

For the quick stuff, I'll use on camera flash and bounce it off walls, even a groomsman's white shirt, if I'm in a pinch! hehe!

I'm looking to try to assist in at least one wedding before I shoot one, to get a feel for the pace. I'm confident I can do it, I just don't want anything to go wrong.

Thanks everyone!


Puggle
---------
Canon 1DXmkII, 5DmkIV, Sony A7rII, PhaseOne XF IQ100, PhaseOne 645DF+D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Traviz
Hatchling
Avatar
3 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Płońsk, Poland
     
Dec 08, 2010 09:44 |  #9

I do not know if I understand it correctly, but I sugest you to make maximum use of ambient light ;)
I see that you have few very light lenses so make good use of them and leave softboxes alone :)


Fotografia Ślubna Płońsk Warszawa (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Dec 08, 2010 11:11 |  #10

puggle wrote in post #11415742 (external link)
Thanks! Yes, I'm bringing an assistant who has shot many weddings and he's very experienced. I've been studying David Ziser's books and watching all the videos on Kelby training for weddings. I'm a huge fan of Cliff Mautner's wedding photography to.

I'll be as prepared as I possibly can. I always jump into knew endeavors with two feet. So far, I'm planning to use OCF for candid's, and I'll use my Alien Bees for large group shots.

For the quick stuff, I'll use on camera flash and bounce it off walls, even a groomsman's white shirt, if I'm in a pinch! hehe!

I'm looking to try to assist in at least one wedding before I shoot one, to get a feel for the pace. I'm confident I can do it, I just don't want anything to go wrong.

Thanks everyone!

Wow, it sounds like you're making this way more complex than you need to. OCF for candids? Just do the on-cam bounce flash thing. ESPECIALLY for your first wedding. You'll be lucky if you even remember to properly change ISO every time. Keep it simple and add to it as you get comfortable. You say you don't want anything to go wrong, but adding this much complexity to your first wedding is a GREAT way to have things go wrong.

I LOVE using flash and good lighting techniques, but even still, there are many many many times where it's just not practical to use due to time and schedule.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Dec 08, 2010 12:21 |  #11

Listen to Lloyd; he is Yoda. :)


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cristphoto
Goldmember
1,052 posts
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Maryland
     
Dec 10, 2010 16:42 |  #12

Peacefield wrote in post #11410005 (external link)
I've never really found the portability and ease of set-up/take-down for flash soft boxes to be acceptable (at least not for me and how I pack and work). Especially not compared to umbrellas.

I use a 22" white shoot-through, 22" reflective silver, and a folding 36" that Ziser markets. They all do a pretty good job but the white 22" is my favorite. It's very light and portable, cheap (I picked it up used off eBay for $12), and for all but large groups it seems to do just as good a job as the 36".

Take a look at the Norman softboxes. They make three - 22x22 inch, 36x36 inch and 48x48 inch. They literally open and close like an umbrella - about 1 second. Instead of a click lock device (like an umbrella) there is a set screw that takes another 2 seconds to lock. No messing with inserting/removing rods, bending or breaking parts, etc. I think the Norman uses the same ring as Photogenic so adaptors should be easy to find. Real nice system. I have no complaints with mine.


1DX MK II, 5D MKIV x2, 24L II, 35L II, 50L, 85LIS, 100LIS Macro, 135L, 16-35LIS, 24-105LIS II, 70-200LIS, 100-400LIS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Dec 13, 2010 12:12 |  #13

picturecrazy wrote in post #11416724 (external link)
Wow, it sounds like you're making this way more complex than you need to. OCF for candids? Just do the on-cam bounce flash thing. ESPECIALLY for your first wedding. You'll be lucky if you even remember to properly change ISO every time. Keep it simple and add to it as you get comfortable. You say you don't want anything to go wrong, but adding this much complexity to your first wedding is a GREAT way to have things go wrong.

I LOVE using flash and good lighting techniques, but even still, there are many many many times where it's just not practical to use due to time and schedule.

Yes, this.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jerrybsmith
Senior Member
Avatar
299 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
     
Dec 15, 2010 13:28 |  #14

Picturecrazy is right on. Your #1 priority is to capture good pictures of everything that happens. As you gain experience, you will see opportunities in you work where different lighting would enhance the results. Controlling ambient light so it's not too dark will be your biggest challenge with OCF but bumping the ISO, bounce flash and proper shutter speeds can give you great results. Adding fill flash in Lightroom will add to the results as well. When starting out, we all think the next piece of gear will make our pictures better. With experience, you find less is more and look for ways to master the equipment you have.


www.jerrybsmith.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Svetlana
Goldmember
Avatar
3,357 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Dec 16, 2010 23:09 |  #15

I completely agree with Lloyd! Don't make things so complex on your first wedding, the day will be super fast paced and it will be unreal for you to think about all the OCF shots and settings - you may miss some important stuff while you set up.


Canon 7D, 5Dmk2, 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, Canon 50 1.2L, 35 1.4L, 85 1.8, Canon 16-35L, Canon 100 2.8L IS Macro, Speedlight 580EX II x 2, 430 EX, enthusiasm.:D http://svetlanayanova.​com/ (external link)

Join me on Facebook (external link)! :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,691 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
1st wedding! Light modifier question...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1029 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.