Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 Dec 2010 (Wednesday) 18:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I <3 selective coloring!

 
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 08, 2010 21:26 |  #16

Yeah, it can make for an interesting learning project!

I've used it to practice with the Lightroom local adjustment brushes -- on this shot I lowered the saturation in all the color channels and then used a brush with Saturation for the Reds cranked up and then another with Saturation for the Greens cranked up and then just did some brushing over a couple areas and came up with this -- not a great image but it was fun:

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/tonylong/image/123748231.jpg

Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imgnxpsr
Member
Avatar
38 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 07, 2011 03:38 |  #17

I love selective colour, yes I'm a newbie and maybe I'll 'grow out of it' but it reminds me of a post by Scott Kelby on HDR (external link).

Non-photographer's love the effect. I think its scorn has to do with the fact that it is much more of a photoshop skill than a photography skill though when taking photos, knowing which ones will work as HDR or Black and White or Selective Colour is a skill.

I can understand why it is seen as lazy, like HDR you can turn an average photo into something that really pops. If you're an art critique you can slag it off however if you're a businessman I'd think twice before dismissing something clients love.


Cameras don't take good pictures, photographers take good pictures
ImaginExposure (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jan 07, 2011 05:48 |  #18

imgnxpsr wrote in post #11590415 (external link)
I think its scorn has to do with the fact that it is much more of a photoshop skill than a photography skill

No. I think much of it's scorn has to do that a lot of crappy images get selective coloring applied in an attempt to polish a turd ;)
Selective coloring won't turn a boring image interesting. It will turn a boring image into a boring, selectively colored image.

imgnxpsr wrote in post #11590415 (external link)
though when taking photos, knowing which ones will work as HDR or Black and White or Selective Colour is a skill.

Agree 100% there.

It's also a skill to know what objects should be selectively colored:

tim wrote in post #11419148 (external link)
It's often used inappropriately, drawing attention to an irrelevant object rather than toward the main subject or focal point of a photo. For example drawing the eye toward flowers, rather than toward the bride and groom in the image.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 07, 2011 05:56 |  #19

Nothing wrong with it if it can accomplish a creative purpose or please a client. Just resorting to a gimmick to try and "jazz" people, well, most photogs will give a shrug...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 07, 2011 06:02 |  #20

I used it as a crutch when startng out, but don't need selective coloring to focus the viewer's attention where I want it anymore. Interestingly, none of my clients have asked for it lately either.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tvelet
Member
103 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Jan 07, 2011 08:06 |  #21

LisaJH wrote in post #11419244 (external link)
I've never seen selective color look good. Its like that phase we all go through when we're just starting out that we later look back on in embarrassment and wonder wth we were thinking. lol The fact that the general public still seems drawn to it is quite unfortunate.

So true! Every new guy with a camera who knows three commands in PS will do it - and be proud of it too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jan 07, 2011 09:15 |  #22

Notice how often you hear these phrases:

This project will be a tough nut to crack. That said, it isn’t rocket science. Going forward, we’ll work 24/7, and at the end of the day we will succeed.

People who talk and write this way figure, "Why not use these expressions?"

The answer is: Because they are trite and overused expressions. They issue from minds too lazy to frame an original thought.

Selective color is a visual cliche. It is trite and overused. That's why so many people advise against using it.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Jan 07, 2011 12:16 |  #23

Peano wrote in post #11591547 (external link)
Notice how often you hear these phrases:

This project will be a tough nut to crack. That said, it isn’t rocket science. Going forward, we’ll work 24/7, and at the end of the day we will succeed.

People who talk and write this way figure, "Why not use these expressions?"

The answer is: Because they are trite and overused expressions. They issue from minds too lazy to frame an original thought.

Selective color is a visual cliche. It is trite and overused. That's why so many people advise against using it.

This cracks me up! If a client came to you and asked for it...is this what you would say to them?

If the customer likes it, who cares!


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jan 07, 2011 13:07 |  #24

ShotByTom wrote in post #11592657 (external link)
If a client came to you and asked for it...is this what you would say to them?

Sure. I would and I have said it to clients. I always offer my suggestions on what would make their pictures better. There's nothing disrespectful in pointing out (what they usually don't realize) that a technique has been done to death. Selective color is one. Cross processing (yellow highlights, blue shadows) is another. There are more original and creative ways to make a picture special. But it's up to the client. If he prefers selective color or cross processing, I'm happy to do it.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,300 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
I <3 selective coloring!
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2753 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.