I just shot my first paid wedding. It was very stressful, but I enjoyed it a lot. Here are a few of my favorite shots from the day.
KayakPhotos Goldmember More info | Dec 09, 2010 16:02 | #1 |
muskyhunter Goldmember 1,137 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Dec 09, 2010 16:05 | #2 #2 is kind if weird for a wedding pic
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cappz Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Sydney More info | Dec 09, 2010 19:25 | #3 i personally think the first shot is beautiful 7D | 50mm | 18-135mm | 480 EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 10, 2010 08:51 | #4 cappz wrote in post #11425398 i personally think the first shot is beautiful maybe too blurred on the left or not enough on the right?#4: wedding dress is too dark and slightly odd angle? #7: too blurred and dark, his head is slightly chopped off #8: need a better crop, too much space on the left Thanks for the critique Just a thought from Daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kristyberends Member 48 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Dec 11, 2010 09:01 | #5 good work! I think your focus as you do more of these is on lighting...although I am basically referring to first one of the ceremony (#5?), and that can be tough. Cool angle at the couple in that one... Grand Rapids Wedding Photographers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheFramedLife Goldmember 1,054 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Saskatchewan, Canada More info | Dec 11, 2010 09:30 | #6 Permanent banThe kiss looks OOF...which sucks because it's one of the most important moments. The Framed Life
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auroraskye Goldmember 2,445 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Plano, TX More info | Dec 11, 2010 12:04 | #7 Not a terrible job, but I would up your ISO on the ceremony photos. The 40D can handle a 1250 ISO with no problem and I rather have grain than motion blur. 1/13th of a second is too slow, especially when you are going for a moment as important as the kiss. I am super cool n' stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 13, 2010 09:24 | #8 auroraskye wrote in post #11433948 Not a terrible job, but I would up your ISO on the ceremony photos. The 40D can handle a 1250 ISO with no problem and I rather have grain than motion blur. 1/13th of a second is too slow, especially when you are going for a moment as important as the kiss. I agree with you. I switched cameras and hadn't changed my settings unfortunately. Just a thought from Daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dkim82 Senior Member 588 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Garden Grove, CA More info | Dec 13, 2010 11:36 | #9 i'm looking forward to shooting my first event soon too - i imagine it must be easy to forget settings while under such pressure - 4 is beautiful btw 5d mk2 - Canon 28-70mm f/2.8L - Canon FD 35mm f/2.8 tilt/shift - Zeiss 35-70mm f/3.4 - Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS - Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 13, 2010 16:01 | #10 dkim82 wrote in post #11444406 i'm looking forward to shooting my first event soon too - i imagine it must be easy to forget settings while under such pressure - 4 is beautiful btw You are right about that! What made things really difficult with the ceremony was that it was one of those places that you pay a certain amount to use and the owner was not willing to let me come in and scope things out ahead of time so I had to totally wing it. Then the pastor that was supposed to officiate ended up having to go to the hospital, so the bride ended up having to pay the guy that opened up the church for us to do it since he was licensed. Just a thought from Daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neetupahwa Hatchling 6 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Dec 13, 2010 17:49 | #11 Cool. Good Job. I liked it. Good start. Adam Spooner
LOG IN TO REPLY |
suecassidy Goldmember 4,102 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 Location: Huntington Beach California More info | Dec 14, 2010 11:18 | #12 How did the bride handle the officiate not being there, when she first found out? Wow. Talk about panic potential. I've seen brides melt down over less... Sue Cassidy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
suecassidy Goldmember 4,102 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 Location: Huntington Beach California More info | Dec 14, 2010 11:21 | #13 BTW, I don't think I've ever seen a bridal shot from the front looking at the guests. You won't likely be able to pull THAT off in too many places. I don't think I would ever do that, it is intruding into their moment just a bit too much. How many people were looking at the photographer on the altar and not them? Even if it is a casual event and you were using a zoom, I think that is bad wedding photog manners. Thoughts? Sue Cassidy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 14, 2010 11:23 | #14 Like the first one a lot. Michelle Brooks Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 14, 2010 11:41 | #15 suecassidy wrote in post #11450838 BTW, I don't think I've ever seen a bridal shot from the front looking at the guests. You won't likely be able to pull THAT off in too many places. I don't think I would ever do that, it is intruding into their moment just a bit too much. How many people were looking at the photographer on the altar and not them? Even if it is a casual event and you were using a zoom, I think that is bad wedding photog manners. Thoughts? This is a good point. I wanted to make sure that I could get the shot so I may have been a little bit too intrusive. I couldn't think of another way to get a good angle of the faces. The ceremony was VERY short and I kind of had to get the best shots I could in a really short period of time. Just a thought from Daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1092 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||