![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
Supersteve911 Senior Member 613 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2010 Location: MN More info | Dec 11, 2010 01:11 | #1
5D III | 24-105 | 85 1.8 | 70-200 II 2.8 | 2 430 EX II's | 580 EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hieu1004 Goldmember 3,579 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Seattle More info | Dec 11, 2010 10:22 | #2 |
suecassidy Goldmember 4,102 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 Location: Huntington Beach California More info | Dec 11, 2010 10:26 | #3 Try a landscape crop of that shot that includes his hands and face and see what that looks like... Sue Cassidy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kyle_4375 Senior Member 293 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Cincinnati, OH More info | Weird crop. You clipped off the top of his head. As other said, horizontal would be better. Canon 50D | Tamron 17-50 | Tamron 70-300 | Nifty Fifty | 430ex | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hmmmmm...I really like that one. Maybe it's cuz I'm odd lol. Here is the horizontal...
5D III | 24-105 | 85 1.8 | 70-200 II 2.8 | 2 430 EX II's | 580 EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
suecassidy Goldmember 4,102 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 Location: Huntington Beach California More info | Dec 13, 2010 13:30 | #6 I like your edit! Sue Cassidy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 13, 2010 14:24 | #7 |
nisefase Member 188 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Dec 13, 2010 19:58 | #8 suecassidy wrote in post #11433521 Try a landscape crop of that shot that includes his hands and face and see what that looks like... I agree and it seems like you did vignette which I am not a fan od since it makes the head to dark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RbnDave Goldmember 1,077 posts Joined Feb 2002 Location: Monterey, California More info | Dec 14, 2010 09:53 | #9 Not bad. California Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2010 03:31 | #10 RbnDave wrote in post #11450279 Not bad. Maybe the baby's face could have a bit more light on it. A reflector aimed at the face would make it pop a bit more. Or, maybe a simple PS curves adjustment would do the trick. You want the face in the steepest part of the curve, but don't take it too far or you'll loose that nice soft cuddly baby look. It's a balancing act. Can you show me what you mean? 5D III | 24-105 | 85 1.8 | 70-200 II 2.8 | 2 430 EX II's | 580 EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2774 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||