airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Dec 11, 2010 13:09 | #1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2010 13:30 | #2 Nice images. Canon Rebel T2i | 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ledhed Goldmember  1,929 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Apsley, On. CAN. More info | Dec 11, 2010 13:33 | #3 the eyes are missing the 'lively' catchlights. Rob - "a photographer is a painter, in a hurry!"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nickbunyun Senior Member 478 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Dec 11, 2010 15:31 | #4 what lens and camera.. i like the bokeh Canon 60D • 50mm 1.8 • Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 • Sigma 30 1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5D 200 2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2010 15:52 | #6 led hed wrote in post #11434328  the eyes are missing the 'lively' catchlights. catchlights bring the eyes to life, they are too dark in these pictures. Just enough light in the eyes for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2010 15:52 | #7 siiilent wrote in post #11434317 Nice images. They do look a bit soft though, also I would lighten up the eyes a bit The pupils are razor sharp on the originals.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonnoob Cream of the Crop  8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Dec 11, 2010 15:55 | #8 i would have gone with more DOF, to get past the eyes. they DO look a tad soft. David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2010 15:58 | #9 canonnoob wrote in post #11434928 i would have gone with more DOF, to get past the eyes. they DO look a tad soft. The eyes are what I really care about. The skin is usually a little better a bit soft. Photobucket and the net never do any images justice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kraaazymike Goldmember 1,231 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 More info | Dec 11, 2010 17:30 | #10 airfrogusmc wrote in post #11434943 The eyes are what I really care about. The skin is usually a little better a bit soft. Photobucket and the net never do any images justice. If you say they're sharp at 100% crop, then ya Photobucket is really hurting these. Otherwise, great smiles and poses for these shots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2010 17:52 | #11 kraaazymike wrote in post #11435372 If you say they're sharp at 100% crop, then ya Photobucket is really hurting these. Otherwise, great smiles and poses for these shots. Thanks and yes they are sharp. A client would never get portraits from me that the eyes weren't.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Slaterza Goldmember 2,007 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Beijing, China More info | Dec 11, 2010 17:53 | #12 |
ledhed Goldmember 1,929 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Apsley, On. CAN. More info | Dec 11, 2010 22:01 | #13 airfrogusmc wrote in post #11434906 Just enough light in the eyes for me. catchlights could be whiter. and the last one is lacking noticeable catchlights in the eyes. Rob - "a photographer is a painter, in a hurry!"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 11, 2010 22:23 | #14 led hed wrote in post #11436476 catchlights could be whiter. and the last one is lacking noticeable catchlights in the eyes. For you and thats cool. I'm usually ok if theres a twinkle and there is. Sometimes the expression or feel of the image for me will trump almost everything else. If you have a dead portrait all the catch lights in the world won't bring it to life.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Erik_L Goldmember 3,160 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Minnesota More info | Dec 12, 2010 02:29 | #15 airfrogusmc wrote in post #11434902 5D 200 2L I hate you! Canon EOS 1D III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1612 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
