Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Dec 2010 (Saturday) 17:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Print quality on different lenses better?

 
Nickc84
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 11, 2010 17:34 |  #1

I figure I would ask this question since I will be getting prints made for my first two weddings this spring. I have a great copy of the Canon 50mm 1.8 II and its pretty close in sharpness compared to my new Canon 85mm 1.8...I went to a store and made instant prints on the Kodak machine and I noticed the 85mm lens shots were amazing but the 50mm shots were blurry. Both images look great on my LCD screen though. Are some lenses just more suitable for prints? BTW I am getting my wedding pictures printed professionally but this recent discovery has me a little puzzled. I am a noob when it comes to prints. Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Player9
Senior Member
658 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Dec 11, 2010 18:33 |  #2

Samples?


RP, 60D, RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS, RF 35mm f/1.8 IS, RF 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, EF-S 18-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, EF 28mm f/1.8, EF 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro, EF 85mm f/1.8, El-100, 430ex, 220ex, Alien Bee B400 (2), Alien Bee B800 (2)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2010 18:48 |  #3

The answer to your question is no. Post a link to the exact file you sent for printing.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Dec 11, 2010 18:53 as a reply to  @ Player9's post |  #4

It's just basic Image Quality or IQ. Better lenses, like Canon's L series have the potential give you an image that is sharper, better resolution, truer colors, better contrast... etc. You get what you pay for.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nickc84
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 11, 2010 19:01 |  #5

Wow, I am a idiot. I realized I changed the camera option to Adobe RGB for the newer shots I took with the Canon 85mm ..Sorry guys, that must be the reason.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 11, 2010 19:09 |  #6

Nickc84 wrote in post #11435395 (external link)
I figure I would ask this question since I will be getting prints made for my first two weddings this spring. I have a great copy of the Canon 50mm 1.8 II and its pretty close in sharpness compared to my new Canon 85mm 1.8...I went to a store and made instant prints on the Kodak machine and I noticed the 85mm lens shots were amazing but the 50mm shots were blurry. Both images look great on my LCD screen though. Are some lenses just more suitable for prints? BTW I am getting my wedding pictures printed professionally but this recent discovery has me a little puzzled. I am a noob when it comes to prints. Thanks

So, what was your print size, and how did you view these on your computer. and what exactly do you mean by "blurry"? The larger the print, the more good sharp detail will matter, so if you were just viewing at a small size on your monitor you won't necessarily see the same as, say, an 8x10 print. But if you were viewing at a decent size and the two looked good, the question would be why did they look different in print? Was it sharpness, or maybe an overall lack of contrast that you just didn't catch in post processing?

On your computer, see if you can get the images to show the differences at a given viewing size. For example, you should be able to get a "50%" view of your images using DPP, Camera Raw, or Lightroom -- see if you can do that with both images and compare and spot the difference you were seeing.

If so, you could post a close crop here of the two and we could maybe give you helpful tips, but we'd have to be able to actually see the what you are talking about...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 11, 2010 19:19 |  #7

Adobe RGB doesn't make prints blurry.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 11, 2010 19:26 |  #8

Nickc84 wrote in post #11435735 (external link)
Wow, I am a idiot. I realized I changed the camera option to Adobe RGB for the newer shots I took with the Canon 85mm ..Sorry guys, that must be the reason.

tim wrote in post #11435808 (external link)
Adobe RGB doesn't make prints blurry.

I agree with Tim -- actual blurriness has to do with possible focus issues or, possibly, that you were using a lens setting that was not optimal, meaning that details would be softer with one shot. Using AdobeRGB can cause unpleasant color shifts if the printer you are using is unable to properly handle that color space, but that's not the same.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,012 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Print quality on different lenses better?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2571 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.