Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 12 Dec 2010 (Sunday) 15:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tagged Wildlife

 
oldtimingman
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
     
Dec 12, 2010 15:50 |  #1

I try to get out on a regular basis to see what critters are feeling photogenic on that particular day. I seem to run into a number of critters (fur and feather) that have been tagged (I'm being kind here). And no, I'm not a big fan of the 'technology' used in this process. So I got to thinking that I can't be the only one noticing this and maybe there is enough interest for a thread. We'll see. I'll go first with ol U6. I actually received some acknowledgment from the banding authority (Maryland) in the form of an official 'attaboy' suitable for framing :D.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


...old

John Wayne was right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
res
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Central Michigan
     
Dec 12, 2010 19:52 |  #2

You will see banding on many birds. There are multiple groups that band them for study so that habitat, migration, breeding success, what ever can be studied. I have a shot of an eagle with a leg band but it is only a silver band. It does not have the tag like yours. Will see if I can dig it up.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldtimingman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
     
Dec 13, 2010 16:37 |  #3

Actually most of my tagged shots are on animals with this exception...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


After sneaking around for a good angle/shot this rutting bull gave me a shot. In pp I noticed the "#@$^&$> collar..


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



...old

John Wayne was right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
res
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Central Michigan
     
Dec 13, 2010 19:09 as a reply to  @ oldtimingman's post |  #4

Yes, it can be a problem with the mammels since most of them are radio collars. I did see a deer one time with a bright orange tag in it's ear but I think it was a captive deer that had escaped.



IMAGE: http://gobirdphoto.smugmug.com/Gods-Creatures/Feathered/The-Springs/DPP0015/818091263_zqWjq-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://gobirdphoto.smu​gmug.com …4ecL#818091263_​zqWjq-A-LB  (external link)

IMAGE: http://gobirdphoto.smugmug.com/Other/Tracks/IMG9026/1125513956_H9FBQ-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://gobirdphoto.smu​gmug.com …d6i#1125513956_​H9FBQ-A-LB  (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldtimingman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
     
Dec 15, 2010 15:30 |  #5

That's a much better tag on the eagle than ol u6 has to drag around. Poor doe..2 tags and is she scarred on the left side?

....old


John Wayne was right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S_wilk
Hatchling
Avatar
5 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: La Rioja, Spain
     
Dec 19, 2010 12:10 as a reply to  @ oldtimingman's post |  #6

I know my eyesight isn't great but I didn't even notice these tags at the time I took the photo - too busy trying to keep the "3 points in contact for steady hand-holding" while slipping slowly down a scree slope I think.

Got some interesting information and a thank-you back from the taggers.

(There's a leg ring too - just in case its wings fall off in a high speed turn?)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Steve
EOS 50D, Canon EF-S 18-200 IS, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon EF 100 macro, non-stabilised hands

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldtimingman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
     
Dec 20, 2010 02:39 |  #7

Nice shot...I wonder If It has enough banding? And why it doesn't chew them off? If you take the time to find the 'banding authority' they usually are pretty appreciative.

....old


John Wayne was right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S_wilk
Hatchling
Avatar
5 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: La Rioja, Spain
     
Dec 20, 2010 04:56 |  #8

Thanks. I think the tags are placed at the same distance as our elbows - just out of reach (well they are for me. Maybe this could be a new POTN survey?)

First time I saw the photo in PP I thought the tags said LAX. Now I know air traffic control is important but...


Steve
EOS 50D, Canon EF-S 18-200 IS, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon EF 100 macro, non-stabilised hands

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,010 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1331
Joined May 2004
Location: Powell, WY
     
Dec 24, 2010 13:08 |  #9

Try photographing wolves. It's rare to find one of the things that the damn researchers haven't collared. You'd think they were their pet freaking dogs.

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/rikwriter/image/124848398.jpg

My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ducklabdad
Senior Member
Avatar
579 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2009
Location: Olive Branch Miss.
     
Dec 25, 2010 04:30 |  #10

Bands and Collars and the research information that they provide have been a wonderful tool that has helped all of us that enjoy the outdoors as much as we do. Sometimes we are all "selfish" for our own end (taking photos for most of us and we would prefer to not to see the collars, transmitters etc).

That being said, if you will yourself do some research you will see that the information that has been provided by collaring of wolves and Elk and the continued tracking is what has helped get approval to release these animals back into the wild, and helped to rebuild some of those populations where we can access these wonderful animals in the wild and have the "opportunity" to shoot them at all.

The researchers are "thrilled more than you can imagine" when photograpers like us can provide them with actual proof of a trackable sighting that can be documented and the animal is left in the wild to continue to be tracked. If you recieve a letter back when you have called in the information, make sure that you include a photo, and or link to your site letting them know you have photos of that animal, the same with the wolves and Elk, let the DNR or Game and fish know of your sighting and you have shots of those animals with the collars. You just might be surprised and get some of those published.

One last note, waterfowlers as a whole look at the bands collected on a duck or goose they harvest as a real trophy and wear them proudly with there duck calls and dog whistles. Look at the bands as another challenge for yourself as a photographer, capturing a visible band on a duck or goose leg while the bird is in flight and in focus, Is a trophy and also the kind of shot that waterfowl hunters really take note of and are published in waterfowl and outdoor publications.

Sorry for my long winded "rambling"!!!


Just an "ole dog" trying to learn "new tricks"! helpful advice is always welcome!!

Canon 7d, Canon XS/ XSi,18-55, 14-40 L, 70-300, and Bigmos! my"work in progress" http://ducklabdad.smug​mug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldtimingman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
     
Dec 25, 2010 14:27 |  #11

I'm sure most will agree with you on the need for tagging and tracking as will I. But what bugs me is the obtrusiveness of the tag. We have a world full of micro sized gizmos for just about everything but when it comes to tags we're still neanderthal and I know it can be done. I was answering a post about lens sharpness and I randomly went to this photo shot with that particular lens..


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


So then I pump it up to check for sharpness and wth is this?? A small tag?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


So I think it can be done.....


....old

John Wayne was right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
res
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Central Michigan
     
Dec 26, 2010 13:58 |  #12

oldtimingman wrote in post #11512896 (external link)
So then I pump it up to check for sharpness and wth is this?? A small tag?

Not sure, but is it a blank tag in the other ear? I see a spot of reflection in that ear and it appears there is second blank black disc. Not sure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_A
Senior Member
777 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Garfield, NJ
     
Dec 26, 2010 20:16 |  #13

oldtimingman wrote in post #11512896 (external link)
I'm sure most will agree with you on the need for tagging and tracking as will I. But what bugs me is the obtrusiveness of the tag. We have a world full of micro sized gizmos for just about everything but when it comes to tags we're still neanderthal and I know it can be done.

While I agree with you 100% I think that one of the reasons that the tags are obvious is so that the people doing the tagging can quickly see that the animal in question has already been tagged so they don't have to waste any resources in trying to get closer to it. In fact in some cases, the "tag" is just for visual ID and there is a subcutaneous RFID chip in the animal. In other cases the tag is a radio transmitter which can only be made so small & still have any appreciable power output. I don't necessarrly agree with any of the above, just trying to shed a little light of the supposed whys.


www.AnthonyAgresta.com (external link)
Please 'like' my Facebook Page (external link)
7d Gripped | Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 | EF 24-70 f/2.8L | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS | EF 100 f2.8L Macro | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 1.4X II | EF 2.0X II | 580ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldtimingman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
     
Dec 27, 2010 05:49 |  #14

Yes, there is a blank tag in the other ear and I don't think they're electronic...who knows? Maybe he gets HBO and Showtime? I'm sure they serve their intended purpose. Thanks for the comments.

....old


John Wayne was right....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jan 02, 2011 21:28 |  #15

Here's one I took in Cataloochee Valley - elk #21. He was killed 3 weeks later by a hunter who mistook him for a deer.

IMAGE: http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv347/bradipock/Elk/IMG_2468.jpg

IMAGE: http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv347/bradipock/Elk/IMG_2534.jpg

Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,878 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Tagged Wildlife
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1203 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.