Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 17 Dec 2010 (Friday) 13:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Max print size from a 12MP 5Dc

 
ontopofm
Senior Member
300 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: CA
     
Dec 17, 2010 13:27 |  #1

Hi guys,

I want to make a print size of 24"x36" from my 5Dc or 7D. When I go into Image Size in Photoshop, the 5Dc shows 14"x9" and 7D show 21"x14" from Jpeg files. So does it make a difference in IQ to resize the RAW file to output to that resolution before converting it jpeg? Thanks


Phuc
Flickr (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Dec 17, 2010 13:31 |  #2

ontopofm wrote in post #11469871 (external link)
So does it make a difference in IQ to resize the RAW file to output to that resolution before converting it jpeg? Thanks

You don't need to resize the file, just alter the ppi figure to suit the size of the print. It may work out a bit under the 'ideal' of 300ppi but as the viewing distance will be greater, you can get away with less ppi.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4582
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 17, 2010 13:32 |  #3

If you take the 4368 x 2912 pixels of the 5DC and blow it up from 24x36mm to 24x36", that is a 25.4x magnification of the sensor image, resulting in 114.6 pixels per inch.

Some commercial printers insist on a file which provides 300 dpi, so you would need to resize the pixel count by at least 3x, to meet their minimum standards. Others would simply print what you provided and you then suffer the quality issues of insufficient pixel count.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 17, 2010 14:47 |  #4

To echo and elaborate a bit, you want to check with your print provider as to whether they prefer the image be sized and resampled to say 300 ppi, if they require a ppi figure in the Exif, or whether they have a good print resampling process and can accept your files "as is". Ones who have good resampling can often apply sharpening appropriat to the print size.

In other words, yes people get good prints from the 5DC as well as the 7D at that size. Viewed close, you would see greater fine detail in the higher resolution image, sure, but the 5DC image will, given a high quality original image and proper "output sharpening" deliver the goods. Whether you do the resizing/resampling for that size at a particular ppi or whether it is done at the lab is up to you and the lab.

I have 12x16 prints framed and hanging on my walls from 4 and 6MP cameras with which I am quite happy.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Dec 17, 2010 22:30 |  #5

24 x 36 from a 5D should not be a problem. Of couse, the better the original, the better the final print. If you start with a razor sharp image, you should end up with a very good print.

Subject matter is important. If it's a landscape with lots of distant small detail, you may not be as pleased.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Dec 18, 2010 00:00 as a reply to  @ bohdank's post |  #6

I have printed up to 30x40 from a 20D image so the 5D should be a breeze. I will echo the other sentiments here and speak to your lab on what they want.

If you are hell bent on enlarging the image download a trial version of Genuine Fractals. I have that as part of a plug in suite and it really does a fantastic job of enlarging images.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ontopofm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
300 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: CA
     
Dec 18, 2010 19:52 |  #7

the lab only requires 250 ppi and ask for the file not be resized when sending in. But they do suggest the file to be viewed at 100% with the intended print size as this is a representation of how the file will print. I did resize the image and could not tell the difference at 100%. I'll give it a try but the print is expensive. Thanks fellows


Phuc
Flickr (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 19, 2010 18:00 |  #8

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?p=3740438

I have a 50" print from an ISO800 shot from a 5D classic. It looks awesome, even close up. Some people obsess over the numbers too much.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4582
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 19, 2010 18:19 |  #9

tim wrote in post #11480798 (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?p=3740438

I have a 50" print from an ISO800 shot from a 5D classic. It looks awesome, even close up. Some people obsess over the numbers too much.

A 3/4 length self portrait, Tim ? :lol: ;)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 19, 2010 18:44 |  #10

Wilt wrote in post #11480887 (external link)
A 3/4 length self portrait, Tim ? :lol: ;)

No this is a wedding photo, but I also have an almost life sized cardboard cutout of myself, that image was taken with a 5D classic as well. It was a Christmas present for someone. The cutout's 5 foot tall as when I printed my full height I couldn't get a backing board wide enough.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grimes
Goldmember
1,323 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
     
Dec 19, 2010 20:43 |  #11

I think the largest I have done from my 5d was 18x24, and it came out excellent. I would increase the ppi with whatever program you feel does the best job, then use some unsharp mask to suit your liking.


Alex
5DMKII | 85 f/1.8 | 17-40L f/4 | 24-105 f/4 IS | 40 f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Got ­ Turbo?
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 485
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
     
Dec 19, 2010 21:44 |  #12

I've printed a couple of shots from my 1DmkII at 24x36 and am very happy with the results. 5Dc should be no problem provided the image is sharp and clean to begin with.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,475 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Max print size from a 12MP 5Dc
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2818 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.