Hi all,
Hoping you all could grill me on anything you dislike about this image.
Be super hard on me, I wouldn't be offended by anything if it's a genuine
peice of critique. I would appreciate it a whole lot actually.
CallumPhoto Senior Member 661 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Dec 18, 2010 01:34 | #1 |
workerdrone Member 209 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Western MA More info | Dec 18, 2010 01:49 | #2 This looks somewhat like a cell phone pic, there is nothing really in focus and the color doesn't do anything for me... I know squat about PP. Old: Canon 10-22, 18-55, 24L, 50 1.4, 50L, 85 1.8, 24-105L, 70-200 2.8L nonIS, Sigma 30 1.4, Tamron 18-200 lenses. t2i, 7D, Xsi bodies. New: D700, 14-24, 50G, 105 VR Macro, 70-300 VR, SB700
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Lots of noise, nothing in focus, white balance issues, glare spot blocking the reflection face. Not sure what the intent was behind the image other than it being just a candid snapshot. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TTk Goldmember 2,518 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Langtoft. England. More info | Dec 18, 2010 06:09 | #4 argyle wrote in post #11473317 Lots of noise, nothing in focus, white balance issues, glare spot blocking the reflection face. Not sure what the intent was behind the image other than it being just a candid snapshot.
Terry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yeah, lots of noise. Personally I don't mind, people I've shown the actual physical print don't mind but you internet folk all seem to dislike it haha. Which is fair enough, each to their own. To be honest with the gear I own I was lucky to even be able to physically create images in that situation but that's not an excuse :P Callum Bright Photography; Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Dec 18, 2010 06:50 | #6 CallumPhoto wrote in post #11473374 Yeah, lots of noise. Personally I don't mind, people I've shown the actual physical print don't mind but you internet folk all seem to dislike it haha. Which is fair enough, each to their own. To be honest with the gear I own I was lucky to even be able to physically create images in that situation but that's not an excuse :P I could show you a similair photo with her in focus, she is actually in focus it's just motion blur but I do have one without it. To be honest I hate it ahah, to static, to boring, lacks any feeling. Which was actually what other photographers I know thought too. Big taste difference between the people I know, and my teachers compared to you helpful bunch at POTN. White balance issues, fair enough. It could potentially use some cooling down and general more accurate white balance but I mean I'm already breaking every other rule ahah. That glare spot is smoke by the way To put it in context it was displayed as part of a youth culture project, so I guess you could say that is the intent.Thanks everyone, interesting hearing what you have to say. If anyone else wants to add that would also be grand. Sometimes, that's best to explain up front...tells the reviewers what the purpose was behind the shot...this will usually be taken into account and could alter reviewer's mindset when doing a critique. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 18, 2010 07:16 | #7 argyle wrote in post #11473417 Sometimes, that's best to explain up front...tells the reviewers what the purpose was behind the shot...this will usually be taken into account and could alter reviewer's mindset when doing a critique. Yeah, fair point. I just feel even better when my photos are well received without me having to say a word, I really like to hear what people think without anything altering their perception. Out of curiousity in this case does it change your opinion? Callum Bright Photography; Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chomish Goldmember 1,917 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Dec 18, 2010 21:50 | #8 I think this would have worked better if she would have been smoking crack
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bcd01 Goldmember 2,429 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Orlando More info | Dec 18, 2010 21:59 | #9 CallumPhoto wrote in post #11473374 people I've shown the actual physical print don't mind but you internet folk all seem to dislike it haha..... I think you need to keep in mind that perhaps some people may not want to tell face to face what they really feel about a print, but you asked us for an honest evaluation. You got one. bcd01 - devices of enjoyment list
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Dec 18, 2010 22:21 | #10 The noise and OOF is not as distracting as the composition. The joint of the 2 walls split the photo in half and nothing ties it back together. The way she is holding the cigarette also looks posed and not natural.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Dec 18, 2010 23:36 | #12 PermanentlyWell I have no idea why you want people to beat you over the head this image is fantastic as is. I personally love it and I'm getting pretty picky these days. The use of motion works really well, the print tone is excellent, and the mirror adds reflection on more than one level.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2010 20:36 | #13 bcd01 wrote in post #11476774 I think you need to keep in mind that perhaps some people may not want to tell face to face what they really feel about a print, but you asked us for an honest evaluation. You got one. These are my university teachers who have ripped me a new one on several occasions, but yeah if it was anyone else I wouldn't even listen to what they have to say ahah. Because I've tested my friends and family with bad photos and they say they like them even though they are very average jetcode wrote in post #11477247 Well I have no idea why you want people to beat you over the head this image is fantastic as is. I personally love it and I'm getting pretty picky these days. The use of motion works really well, the print tone is excellent, and the mirror adds reflection on more than one level. I would like to say something concerning a trend I see a lot. This is a one up image. There will never be another expression like it. I say this because I think photographers in general dismiss a lot of images wholesale as if there is no value whatsoever. I am of the school that says let's have another look. This image has a lot of charm and character. Very original. I would buy a print for my collection. \ Callum Bright Photography; Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hockmasm Junior Member 29 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Dec 20, 2010 12:49 | #14 Permanent banSPAM PUT AWAY This post is marked as spam. |
erinavery Senior Member 452 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Dec 20, 2010 13:32 | #15 um..i'm sorry to say but i don't like anything about this image...the lighting...the composition...everything is off...there is no focus...no clear subject or point...nothing is emphasized...no mood expressed... and i don't like how she's holding the cigarette or what she's wearing...just nothing of interest...i'm sorry. :/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2830 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||