We put our house on the market a few weeks ago and I did the pics for the advertising. Looking for some C&C. (it sold in the first open inspection
)
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
supernova74 Senior Member 957 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Adelaide, Australia More info | Dec 19, 2010 22:56 | #1 We put our house on the market a few weeks ago and I did the pics for the advertising. Looking for some C&C. (it sold in the first open inspection 02 03 04 05 06 07 Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
supernova74 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 957 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Adelaide, Australia More info | Dec 19, 2010 22:57 | #2 And a couple more: Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DC5Poe Member 206 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Boston MA More info | Dec 19, 2010 23:39 | #3 Attempt to rent a fish-eye lens. It'll make the rooms appear more spacious and you also can cover the whole room in the photo. It may be due to your crop factor, but the rooms seem to tight. Know what I mean? 5D mk II : i7 iMac : Tamron 28-75 F2.8 : Sigma 50 1.4 : Canon 70-200 F4L IS : Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro : Yongnuo YN468
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CallumPhoto Senior Member 661 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Dec 20, 2010 04:20 | #4 DC5 Poe wrote in post #11482506 Attempt to rent a fish-eye lens. It'll make the rooms appear more spacious and you also can cover the whole room in the photo. It may be due to your crop factor, but the rooms seem to tight. Know what I mean? I wouldn't recomend a fish eye for selling a house, but I was going to ask what focal length you shot them at because it seems like around 24mm on a crop body. If you could get something closer to 16mm it would probably look a bit better rooms wise. Callum Bright Photography; Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
supernova74 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 957 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Adelaide, Australia More info | Dec 20, 2010 04:49 | #5 Yeah 17mm on a 50D. Ideally id have liked a 16-35 on a 5Dii. That combo is on the wish list Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CallumPhoto Senior Member 661 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Dec 20, 2010 05:43 | #6 supernova74 wrote in post #11483356 Yeah 17mm on a 50D. Ideally id have liked a 16-35 on a 5Dii. That combo is on the wish list ![]() Oh really? Looked like a longer focal length than that to me. I'm not sure if you're familair with why you get compression and exageration but it's not the lens. It's just the distance you are from what you photograph, so if you're further back and had to crop them it will appear that you've used a longer focal length. But yeah I mean obviously you've done the best you can with the gear you've got, if you don't have acess to 16mm on a FF body you just can't produce that same exageration so seems like you've done a fine job to me. Callum Bright Photography; Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1339 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||