Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 20 Dec 2010 (Monday) 01:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Taking Pictures of stars...

 
InfiniteGrim
Member
75 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2010
     
Dec 20, 2010 01:14 |  #1

EDIT: I removed the pictures from the post because the site was not auto scaling.

I've been taking dozens of shots of the moon with my first DSLR, got it last week. No I'm ready for the eclipse tomorrow but I want to try taking pictures of the stars.

My issue is that I cannot get one clear and focused picture. I've tried dozens of settings to no avail. Also I'm relying on the auto focus on the moon then trying it on the stars because I cannot get a good focus manually.

Here are a couple I have tried. There is a ton of light pollution as you can tell from the bottom of every picture being lighter.

Using Canon T1i 55-250mm

This shot looks clear on the first take but at 100% the stars are ovals, then in the second take everything is lines, not dots.


http://img195.imagesha​ck.us/img195/9103/img1​701k.jpg (external link)

First Shot take 1
5 second exposure
F stop 1/4
ISO 200

http://img196.imagesha​ck.us/img196/8247/img1​702z.jpg (external link)


First Shot take 2
30 second exposure
F stop 1/4
ISO 200


Now in the second shot I have a really bright star center and Orion's belt in the top left. The first take shows the bright star clearly but nothing else, then in a longer exposure showing Orion's belt nothing is really sharp. Only the three star's in Orion's belt appear to be in focus and sharp. If you look at the 100% you can see streaks for stars or just ovals, or double circles like the bright star.


http://img151.imagesha​ck.us/img151/2792/img0​676b.jpg (external link)

Second Shot take 1
1 second exposure
F stop 1/11
ISO 100


http://img23.imageshac​k.us/img23/822/img0677​k.jpg (external link)

Second Shot take 2
6 second exposure
F stop 1/4
ISO 100

In this shot the stars are more like circles then in the other pictures but the bright star is not a circle at all in any of the pictures


http://img26.imageshac​k.us/img26/5416/img005​8xk.jpg (external link)

Third Shot take 1
2.5 second exposure
F stop 1/4
ISO 400
http://img594.imagesha​ck.us/img594/3532/img0​059xj.jpg (external link)


Third Shot take 2
5 second exposure
F stop 1/4
ISO 400

http://img641.imagesha​ck.us/img641/6876/img0​060ce.jpg (external link)
Third Shot take 3
10 second exposure
F stop 1/4
ISO 400




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Dec 20, 2010 01:15 |  #2

YIKES! :shock:

Might want to resize these to 1024X...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
InfiniteGrim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
75 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2010
     
Dec 20, 2010 01:36 |  #3

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #11482804 (external link)
YIKES! :shock:

Might want to resize these to 1024X...

Im used to other forums that automatically resize. I just made them links instead.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Dec 20, 2010 07:28 |  #4

InfiniteGrim wrote in post #11482888 (external link)
Im used to other forums that automatically resize. I just made them links instead.

Yes, but I guess most people are like me and don't have the patience to wait for 15 megapixels to download.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sintax
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Tampa/Port Richey, FL
     
Dec 21, 2010 01:27 |  #5

a couple megabytes? takes about 2-3 seconds :-p

look great though!


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/BrandonQ/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
azpix
Goldmember
Avatar
3,335 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Chandler, Arizona USA
     
Dec 21, 2010 01:31 |  #6

i am just seeing black with a few speckles. not much interesting to look at.


Gear- 7d, 24-70L, sigma 70-200, Sigma 120-400, canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.0,sigma 10-20 and a DJI Mavic Pro Drone

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martyn_bannister
Senior Member
568 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 21, 2010 13:00 |  #7

I think that there are a combination of things wrong here. With the 7D you have a 1.6 crop factor, so the lens is behaving like a 88-400mm on a full frame camera. If you are not using a tracking device, at 400mm, even in focus, you will only be able to use very short exposures before the stars start to "trail". Short exposure (even at high ISO) will not give you much light. Similarly, at 88mm, you have a bit longer before trails start, but the light received will be limited. Also, to increase the depth of field and increase the chances of being in focus, it is advisable to stop the lens down at least two stops, further reducing the light received.

On top of this, auto-focus has very little to go on, so manual focus is the order of the day and this in itself is very difficult to see in the viewfinder.

So, without the benefit of tracking, if it was me (YMMV) I would use the 55mm end exclusively, stop down one stop, lock the lens in manual focus mode and use live view and 10x live view zoom to focus. Choose the highest ISO you can get away with, lock the mirror up to eliminate any possible shake from that and, ensuring you have a sturdy tripod well fixed, use a remote shutter release to trip the camera. Start with short exposures and lengthen them until the stars start to trail unacceptably.

Other thoughts
- buy a cheap but cheerful 24mm manual lens. This will give you a slightly wider angle and therefore longer exposure.
- include some foreground in all shots - makes them much more interesting
- go for star trail shots in the first place
- get a tracking device - expensive and painful to set up

Good luck and let us know how you get on!

Just my 2p :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Dec 21, 2010 15:58 |  #8

For shots of the stars I think there are a couple of pointers that may help you.

If you are struggling to focus on the stars themselves, is there a light in the far distance that you can use? Or perhaps if the moon is out, you could use that. After correctly focussing on infinity, put your lens on MF so that the focus doesn't subsequently change.

If you don't have the use of a tracking mount, you are better off using wide angle lenses. The reason for this is that a tele lens will emphasise the apparent movement of the stars, meaning that your exposures will need to be shorter to avoid star trailing.

Which brings us to exposure. Most of the stars out there are extremely faint, so we need to give the camera a helping hand to capture what light is out there. The first way to do this is to make a longer exposure. The length of exposure will be limited by the lens you are using. See the point made in the paragraph above. Secondly, boost your ISO. 800 should be OK on the 7D, as I believe it is quite good at higher ISO levels without suffering from excessive noise.

Have fun.


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,042 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Taking Pictures of stars...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1082 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.