New to this HDR forum.
Here is a photo taken last year and it was nearly a rubbish from the first sight. But a few process with psuedo HDR and a little bit more turned it into a very acceptable one.
Here is the result.
jesseli Member 70 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Beijing, China More info | Dec 20, 2010 05:03 | #1 New to this HDR forum. G9, 30D, 7D, EF20/2.8, EF28/1.8, EF50/1.8II, EF20-35/3.5-4.5, EF28-135/3.5-5.6IS, Sigma AF70-200/2.8, 105/2.8Macro, 12-24/3.5-4.5, 2X APO, 420EX, 580EX, MT-24EX, EF12, EF15, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 20, 2010 05:05 | #2 Here is the original, nothing changed from RAW but resized to fit 150k limitation. G9, 30D, 7D, EF20/2.8, EF28/1.8, EF50/1.8II, EF20-35/3.5-4.5, EF28-135/3.5-5.6IS, Sigma AF70-200/2.8, 105/2.8Macro, 12-24/3.5-4.5, 2X APO, 420EX, 580EX, MT-24EX, EF12, EF15, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
G9, 30D, 7D, EF20/2.8, EF28/1.8, EF50/1.8II, EF20-35/3.5-4.5, EF28-135/3.5-5.6IS, Sigma AF70-200/2.8, 105/2.8Macro, 12-24/3.5-4.5, 2X APO, 420EX, 580EX, MT-24EX, EF12, EF15, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 20, 2010 05:08 | #4 Advice and comments are welcome. G9, 30D, 7D, EF20/2.8, EF28/1.8, EF50/1.8II, EF20-35/3.5-4.5, EF28-135/3.5-5.6IS, Sigma AF70-200/2.8, 105/2.8Macro, 12-24/3.5-4.5, 2X APO, 420EX, 580EX, MT-24EX, EF12, EF15, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clipper_from_oz Goldmember More info | Dec 20, 2010 06:27 | #5 I like the B&W.... Well done! Clipper
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Dec 20, 2010 12:36 | #6 The 1st shot is very nice.....my preferred. The red bars in the other 2 make it distracting but not so much in the B&W....I am guessing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TGrundvig Goldmember 2,876 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Dec 20, 2010 14:25 | #7 jesseli wrote in post #11483389 Advice and comments are welcome. Since you are asking, I will comment. This does not qualify as 'HDR', this is Tone Mapping. There is a big difference. Tone Mapping is when you take an image, or bracket of images, and adjust the image to get results like this. A true HDR image is a High Dynamic Range image. The two are often confused but not the same. 1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Clipper, Spike44 and TGrundvig, Thanks for your comments. G9, 30D, 7D, EF20/2.8, EF28/1.8, EF50/1.8II, EF20-35/3.5-4.5, EF28-135/3.5-5.6IS, Sigma AF70-200/2.8, 105/2.8Macro, 12-24/3.5-4.5, 2X APO, 420EX, 580EX, MT-24EX, EF12, EF15, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
J-Blake Great Googley Moogley! More info | Dec 20, 2010 21:59 | #9 I like the third shot the best, but Ithink I would like it more if you took a bit of the saturation out of it. Nice shot all in all. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 20, 2010 22:19 | #10 Jon, G9, 30D, 7D, EF20/2.8, EF28/1.8, EF50/1.8II, EF20-35/3.5-4.5, EF28-135/3.5-5.6IS, Sigma AF70-200/2.8, 105/2.8Macro, 12-24/3.5-4.5, 2X APO, 420EX, 580EX, MT-24EX, EF12, EF15, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 21, 2010 10:59 | #11 TGrundvig wrote in post #11485787 Since you are asking, I will comment. This does not qualify as 'HDR', this is Tone Mapping. There is a big difference. Tone Mapping is when you take an image, or bracket of images, and adjust the image to get results like this. A true HDR image is a High Dynamic Range image. The two are often confused but not the same. With that said, the Tone Mapping seems to have a little too much saturation for the shot. I think the red is a little to bold, IMO. I actually like the B&W best. guess you missed the part where he said "psuedo HDR"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TGrundvig Goldmember 2,876 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Dec 21, 2010 11:01 | #12 Chino3 wrote in post #11491082 guess you missed the part where he said "psuedo HDR" No offense, but there is not such thing as a "psuedo' High Dynamic Range image. 1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1447 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||