Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Sep 2005 (Friday) 09:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

To all prospective 5D purchasers

 
Redbird_xo
Senior Member
Avatar
542 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Sep 09, 2005 09:41 |  #1

What is your number one reason to consider buying a 5D.

1. Sensor: 35.8 x 23.9mm CMOS sensor with essentially the same pixel density with the 1DMK2.
2. Viewfinder: Pentaprism, 0.71x magnification, 20mm eyepoint, 3 types of interchangeable focusing screens, etc. (Yes, just like the 1-series. True?)
3. Focusing system: 9-point AF (plus 6 invisible Assist AF points).
4. LCD monitor: 2.5" TFT, approx. 230k pixel.
5. Metering modes: The usual plus center spot metering (approx. 3.5% viewfinder at center).
6. ISO speed: 100-1600 (in 1/3-stop increments) plus the 50 and 3200 expansion by custom function.
7. Shutter release: Soft touch electromagnetic release.
8. File format: Folder creation & selection is possible.
9. Others. Please specify.

1. does it for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,930 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Sep 09, 2005 09:45 |  #2

Sensor size. Nothing else. A 70-200 length should mean 70-200 etc.

In a couple years we'll have no complaints about sensor size...thus I shy away from EF-S lenses.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillMarks
Senior Member
525 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Sep 09, 2005 10:00 |  #3

1 is the number one reason for me too. But if it didn't have 2, 5 and 6 I probably wouldn't be seriously considering it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RJCONKLIN
Member
105 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Sep 09, 2005 10:15 as a reply to  @ BillMarks's post |  #4

low noise at high iso




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Sep 09, 2005 10:24 as a reply to  @ cosworth's post |  #5

cosworth wrote:
Sensor size. Nothing else. A 70-200 length should mean 70-200 etc.

Hehe, shouldn't that read "A 17-40 lens should mean 17-40 mm"?
Most people don't exactly mind if their 70-200/2.8 'behaves' like a 100-300/2.8 :lol:

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CorruptedPhotographer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,802 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates
     
Sep 09, 2005 14:50 as a reply to  @ cosworth's post |  #6

cosworth wrote:
Sensor size. Nothing else. A 70-200 length should mean 70-200 etc.

In a couple years we'll have no complaints about sensor size...thus I shy away from EF-S lenses.

you got it baby


Gear List
Member since 2005 ^_^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mebailey
Goldmember
1,992 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jul 2005
Location: USA
     
Sep 09, 2005 14:50 as a reply to  @ Andy_T's post |  #7

Number 1 does it for me. I can finally get my wide angles back.


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Sep 09, 2005 15:29 as a reply to  @ mebailey's post |  #8

Basically I am a camera junkie. I probably didn't need to order it but for those occasions where my wide angles just aren't wide enough, this will partially fix it.

Most of the other things on your list I have in my 1DMKII.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Sep 09, 2005 15:36 |  #9

While I really like 1. I don't much fancy 3. Also, I'll rather buy the 1.3x 1D MKII when it's price drops a bit more. I'm not that much of a pixel guy, right now 6 million of them are perfectly sufficient, as I don't like cropping my photos much.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnny ­ Thunder
Caution, Cant keep clothes on
Avatar
790 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Temecua, Ca
     
Sep 09, 2005 15:39 |  #10

#1 for me, with #2 and #6 being Mighty fine as well, and truth be told, #4 is pretty nice.

-Johnny


T2i gripped with kit lenshttp://75.126.234.18/f​orum/showthread.php?t=​400860 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,930 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Sep 09, 2005 17:12 |  #11

hmmm. buy a 20D now then sell it at a loss a couple years from now go get full frame... or buy a full frame 5D now, get the extended warranty and shoot with it as long as I did with my AE-1? Will technology just jump leaps an bounds again and again or will camera design/technology plateau for a bit and stabilize like we did from classic 35mm (ae1 MF stuff) to EOS and then EOS to EOS DLSR.

Go buy the camera you like...


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
17,548 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 1322
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Sep 09, 2005 19:21 |  #12

I was interested in 5D as a wide angle 2nd camera but it has too compromised a feature set to be truly "captive". And I have realised that for me a 1D series body is a requirement for practical reasons. But as I am sometimes in need of _very_ wide FoV, 5D would be a solution...

PS. If I had the money I would buy all Canons :)


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.1 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HrcRacing
Goldmember
Avatar
2,019 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: NE Florida, USA
     
Sep 09, 2005 21:30 as a reply to  @ Pekka's post |  #13

Number one makes me want it but number $3,200.00 :shock: makes me think I'll just stick with my 10D.:lol:


Robert

Canon 40D | Canon EOS Elan 7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 218
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Sep 12, 2005 13:17 |  #14

How's this for rationalization?
I figure that by getting a FF body, I'll save the $500-$800 I'd otherwise have to spend on a 10-?? lens since I'll be able to use my current Sigma 15-30 as an ultra-wide! So a 5D will really only cost me between $2400-$2700, and I won't have that other lens to haul around.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlueTit
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Sep 12, 2005 13:34 |  #15

Jon I love your logic, that's the way I go about justifying purchases that I really should not make. Number 1 and 5 do it for me. However I am interested in the new N too and cant decide which I would get the most use from, as they are both a lot of money I am treating them as the same price for comparison purposes, the debate goes on ... internally.


Daragh
Gear:


Some Photos: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bluetit (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

21,380 views & 0 likes for this thread
To all prospective 5D purchasers
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is brotherbear86
863 guests, 366 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.