Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 Dec 2010 (Friday) 22:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 F/4L non-IS question

 
kport
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 24, 2010 22:20 |  #1

Is there an F-stop that tends to be the sharpest on this lens? I just got one and love it, but noticed some shots not having that pop that I see in photos by others using that lens. I need to experiment and have only shot at f/4 so far.

Thought I'd see how other users get their best results. FYI, I'm using a T2i.

Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SaxonIV
Senior Member
Avatar
768 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Alabama
     
Dec 24, 2010 22:23 |  #2

probably f/5.6 or f/8 would be your best bets. although its known for being supppper sharp at f/4 for a zoom. i would wager the majority of the "pop" comes from post processing anyway.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kport
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 24, 2010 23:15 |  #3

SaxonIV wrote in post #11510536 (external link)
probably f/5.6 or f/8 would be your best bets. although its known for being supppper sharp at f/4 for a zoom. i would wager the majority of the "pop" comes from post processing anyway.

Thanks. I'm sure you're right about the post-work. I've had the lens for just a couple of days and most of my shots were hand-held at 200mm. I'm very impressed with how it handles, just looking to improve :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 148
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Dec 24, 2010 23:16 |  #4

Usually 2 up from the wides it the sharpest. I tested all of my lenses and found that to be true.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
halitime
Goldmember
Avatar
1,271 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Lantzville B.C. Can.
     
Dec 24, 2010 23:19 |  #5

If you want F4 maybe bump up ISO to increase SP


Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/halitime/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM ­ Photos
"Childhood ruined"
Avatar
3,374 posts
Gallery: 65 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 322
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Washington: Spokane
     
Dec 24, 2010 23:21 |  #6

kport wrote in post #11510734 (external link)
Thanks. I'm sure you're right about the post-work. I've had the lens for just a couple of days and most of my shots were hand-held at 200mm. I'm very impressed with how it handles, just looking to improve :)

Thats the culprit right there...if you are shooting fully zoomed in to 200mm focal point you are already going to get unwanted shake from handheld shooting. I would suggest a tripod...even that much is going to make your picture sharper.


Canon 6D, & Sony α6000
Own: 24-105mm f/4L | Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 | Rokinon 14mm f/1.8
Want: 24-70mm f/2.8 L II | 70-200mm f/2.8 L II
Website: Jordyn Murdock Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nyy
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: New Jersey
     
Dec 25, 2010 00:50 |  #7

f4 was extremely sharp on mine. I was very impressed with that lens.


"I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside." --Mitch Hedberg

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmnelson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,286 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2010
     
Dec 25, 2010 01:10 |  #8

I haven't done any scientific comparisons but I have always felt the image quality on mine was satisfactory at f/4, provided that there was sufficient light to avoid shake when hand-holding it.


Gear | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KVN ­ Photo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
     
Dec 25, 2010 06:28 |  #9

nyy wrote in post #11511003 (external link)
f4 was extremely sharp on mine. I was very impressed with that lens.

So do mine, maybe it has some front or back focus issue.


X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
TS-E 24 f/3.5L II + XF 35 f/1.4 + XF 56 f/1.2
Sony RX100 II + G12
Travel the world!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
*Jayrou
Goldmember
Avatar
1,121 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Jersey UK
     
Dec 25, 2010 06:40 |  #10

Mine was sharp at F/4 as long as shutter speed was high enough

I can take sharp images at 1/20 @ 200mm with my IS version , but thats another story.


James
Flickr  (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mk1Racer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,735 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Flagtown, NJ
     
Dec 25, 2010 09:10 |  #11

The one I had was very sharp wide open, and all the way out. As someone else said, you need to make sure you've got a fast enough shutter speed if you're going to shoot it that way though.


7D, BG-E7, BGE2x2 (both FS), 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS (FS), 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk I, 70-300 f/4-5.6L, 550EX, Kenko Pro300 1.4xTC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Dec 25, 2010 11:19 as a reply to  @ Mk1Racer's post |  #12

Both my non-IS and my present IS model are sharp wide open. However, as with any digital image, the images from these lenses benefit from post processing sharpening...


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cnaude
Member
Avatar
173 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ
     
Dec 25, 2010 11:36 |  #13

Mine is extremely sharp wide open. If you want to get really technical check out the tests done by Photozone. http://www.photozone.d​e …st-report--review?start=1 (external link)


Chris Naudé (external link)
7D | Canon 50 f/1.4 USM | Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 | Canon 70-200 f/4 L | Canon 100 f/2.8 Macro USM | Speedlite 580EX II | Kenko Extension Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
V-Wiz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,255 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
     
Dec 25, 2010 12:48 |  #14

F8 would probably be the sharpest, but the most important is your shutter speed, it needs to be fast enought at 200mm.


Gripped 5D Mark II l 24-105 F/4 L l 70-200 F/4 L l Tokina 12-24 F4 l 50mm 1.8 l Sigma 600 Mirror l B+W KSM CPL l B+W 6stop ND filter l Hitech 0.6 GND l YN-468 Flash l Kenko Pro 300 1.4 TC l Induro Tripod, Vanguard 250 Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nyy
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: New Jersey
     
Dec 25, 2010 13:55 |  #15

V-Wiz wrote in post #11512604 (external link)
F8 would probably be the sharpest, but the most important is your shutter speed, it needs to be fast enought at 200mm.

Faster than that if you're on a crop body.


"I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside." --Mitch Hedberg

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,718 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
70-200 F/4L non-IS question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1403 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.