Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 27 Dec 2010 (Monday) 00:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

White Balance - my biggest issue lately

 
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,917 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 845
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Dec 27, 2010 00:02 |  #1

I prefer not to shoot raw but white balance is the one really frustrating area with Canon Cameras. I notice its what I have to adjust most in post and many times auto is way to yellow. I tried using a grey card but the problem with that is if the place your in is not completely consistent they you get really off colors. I can usually fix this but I find auto is almost always wrong.

Can anyone offer some suggestions other then just shooting raw?


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Dec 27, 2010 00:21 |  #2

If you're shooting in mixed lighting, the most consistent method of controlling such issues is to gel the light source(s) so they match.

Anytime you've got, say, daylight through windows and lamps on in a room, you're not going to get them to play nice unless you either alter the temperature of the daylight or the tungsten.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Dec 27, 2010 15:33 |  #3

Tommydigi wrote in post #11520024 (external link)
Can anyone offer some suggestions other then just shooting raw?

If you prefer not to shoot in raw, that's fine. You won't have as much range for adjustment of WB, but small adjustments will work decently.

But I have a suggestion:

Shoot some raw images under the kind of lighting that gives you WB problems and experiment with the various WB options in DPP. They're identical to the camera settings you can use for JPEGs, but you can switch easily between the different settings.

This will give you a better understanding of the WB you'll want to set when shooting JPEGs.

Then you can do the same thing with picture styles, which affect WB quite a lot.

But, as Jay said, mixed lighting is always going to be a problem and often it can't be made to look decent. In that case, you just have to change the lighting. Either by turning off the lamps, using a different light source, or using gels.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,917 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 845
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Dec 27, 2010 21:10 |  #4

Thanks, actually what I usually do is use flash or just shoot raw when its really difficult. I wonder if the next generation of cameras will have a built in white balance that works in mixed conditions.


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:02 |  #5

Tommydigi wrote in post #11525258 (external link)
Thanks, actually what I usually do is use flash or just shoot raw when its really difficult. I wonder if the next generation of cameras will have a built in white balance that works in mixed conditions.

If they do it'll be an amazing breakthrough. Don't hold your breath...

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,781 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NH, USA
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:07 |  #6

Maybe you will have good luck with an ExpoDisc?
I have been getting tired of dealing with White Balance in PP (I shoot raw, so it is doable, just time consuming) and switched over to an ExpoDisc now.


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,917 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 845
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:23 |  #7

Thanks for the suggestions, I see no reason why future updates to camera bodies could not address this at least in some ways. I mean I am not holding my breath but with all the advances in technology a camera that can better manage the temperature of light does not seem that outrageous.

I generally use Nix color effects pro to remove the color cast and it does a good job but just hoping there is an easier way to get it right in the camera.


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:30 as a reply to  @ Tommydigi's post |  #8

Try using your presets, based on the type of light falling on your subject. They're generally pretty accurate these days (at least have been on my 40D and 7D).


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,781 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NH, USA
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:42 |  #9

Tommydigi wrote in post #11525991 (external link)
Thanks for the suggestions, I see no reason why future updates to camera bodies could not address this at least in some ways. I mean I am not holding my breath but with all the advances in technology a camera that can better manage the temperature of light does not seem that outrageous.

I generally use Nix color effects pro to remove the color cast and it does a good job but just hoping there is an easier way to get it right in the camera.

Cameras have gotten a lot better, I used to shoot AWB all the time, rarely ever presetting WB. I just got a ExpoDisc this week and using custom WB a lot now. When I was using AWB though, it was 90% there about 95% of the time, that 10% did make the image look a lot better and it was frustrating because it seems like you can spend 20 minutes on a single image and still not be satisfied with the WB.


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,781 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NH, USA
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:43 |  #10

Shooting an ExpoDisc is easy, but it is still equally frustrating, as light changes and you don't always remember to reshoot.


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Dec 28, 2010 00:30 |  #11

Tommydigi wrote in post #11525991 (external link)
Thanks for the suggestions, I see no reason why future updates to camera bodies could not address this at least in some ways. I mean I am not holding my breath but with all the advances in technology a camera that can better manage the temperature of light does not seem that outrageous.

I generally use Nix color effects pro to remove the color cast and it does a good job but just hoping there is an easier way to get it right in the camera.

Camera "sees" it perfectly...

But no camera, accessory or VooDoo can blend 5200-5500K sunlight and 2500-2800K tungsten and make them match. Flat out impossible. You either gel for the sunlight or gel for the tungsten and then WB a homogeneous scene.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,406 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
White Balance - my biggest issue lately
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2841 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.