Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 27 Dec 2010 (Monday) 15:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3 DG RF APO - Thoughts or experiences

 
thetolleyman
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Williamsburg, VA
     
Dec 27, 2010 15:52 |  #1

I'm consider this older Sigma zoom, as the price is pretty good.

Those of you who may have used this please feel free to give advice or criticism.

thanks.


50D 430EX
35-105 (old school) Sigma 70-200 2.8
28-200 EF 630 Film Tamron 11-18

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
Dec 27, 2010 17:00 |  #2

Love it. Couldn't be happier with a lens than I am with my 150-500.
For the price, I think it is a head to head contender to the 100-400L.
Down sides are: AF is slower and it is heavier than the L
Plus sides are: 100mm more and way better image stabilizer (tough with a louder sound)

The sweet spot is at f/8, so the L is sharper wide open. It might be a deal breaker for you... I know I am very happy with it at f/8.

A few samples all at 500mm:

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3580/3404710944_aa727476a3_z.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3589/3404709248_303157b599_z.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3564/3409263611_fd38ce8a35_z.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3333/3436544582_a0b26cdfde_z.jpg?zz=1

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3355/3498268535_c6f512eaea_z.jpg?zz=1

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/3872075763_eb1c89ee49_z.jpg?zz=1

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3505/4070963472_ab48ab7c23_z.jpg?zz=1

Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Dec 27, 2010 17:09 |  #3

***NOTE***, OP, the lens Alex_Venom is happy with is the 150-500, not the 170-500 you are asking about. The general view on the 170-500 was that it was not too bad, but some way short of the best in its class, hence the relatively low price on the secondhand market today. It lacks the sharpness and the image stabilisation of the newer 150-500OS. So it really boils down to how good a lens you want and how much you can afford, because with optics you really do get what you pay for. The best bet would be if you can give it a try before you buy, and check the results on your computer to see if you'd be happy with it.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
Dec 27, 2010 17:12 |  #4

Madweasel wrote in post #11524015 (external link)
***NOTE***, OP, the lens Alex_Venom is happy with is the 150-500, not the 170-500 you are asking about. The general view on the 170-500 was that it was not too bad, but some way short of the best in its class, hence the relatively low price on the secondhand market today. It lacks the sharpness and the image stabilisation of the newer 150-500OS. So it really boils down to how good a lens you want and how much you can afford, because with optics you really do get what you pay for. The best bet would be if you can give it a try before you buy, and check the results on your computer to see if you'd be happy with it.

Wow! I'm so sorry for that. I totally misread the thread title :oops:


Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Dec 27, 2010 17:16 |  #5

how cheap can you get it...you can usually pick up a used sigma 150-500OS for a little under $800...might be better just to save for that...i think the OS alone would be worth it


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImRaptor
Goldmember
Avatar
1,448 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Humboldt, SK Canada
     
Dec 27, 2010 17:45 |  #6

I had one and it was alright for what it was.
500mm rarely offered pictures of any quality, 450mm was kind of the end point of the usable range in my experience. Depending on the price you can get it will determine if it is worth it or not. While $800 for a 150-500mm is an option, it is well over double what I paid for my 170-500mm when I first got it. I think the only things you are going to find in that price range at that focal length are mirror lenses.

In the end it wasn't a terrible lens, but I also won't buy one again.


http://imraptor.devian​tart.com/ (external link)
Why yes, I am a jerk. Thank you for asking.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thetolleyman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Williamsburg, VA
     
Dec 27, 2010 18:40 |  #7

There's one being advertised locally for $400.


50D 430EX
35-105 (old school) Sigma 70-200 2.8
28-200 EF 630 Film Tamron 11-18

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Dec 27, 2010 18:45 |  #8

thetolleyman wrote in post #11524472 (external link)
There's one being advertised locally for $400.

that seems to be what the going price is on ebay for them as well...if you can't save up anymore you could just give it a go, and use it/test it out...see if it works for you...if not just sell it for about the same price, and not really be out anything...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,050 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3 DG RF APO - Thoughts or experiences
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1329 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.