Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 27 Dec 2010 (Monday) 17:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Long Exposures from Universal Studios Rooftop

 
natums
Senior Member
739 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 27, 2010 17:54 |  #1

So I come from a video background so I have a good grasp of all the concepts used in photography, I just am learning how to re-apply them. These are all unmodified, just uploaded to flickr.

Canon T2i | 18-55mm stock lens

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5168/5298412646_54b7513e77_b.jpg
ISO 800 f/5.6 1.6secs
- Shortest exposure of the bunch, I like the sky and distant lights, Waterworld set is way obnoxious though.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5001/5298438292_05c37630c6_b.jpg
ISO 200 f/14 15secs
- Close focus, kinda ruined the background but I like how sharp Waterworld looks.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5001/5298435536_34a8ca6551_b.jpg
ISO 200 f/14 15secs
- This one I feel is the best well rounded shot of the bunch, but I don't like it, and I don't know why...

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5124/5298424860_291e69659d_b.jpg
ISO 200 f/20 30secs
- I would probably crop the bottom but the Simpson ride looks awesome.

Feedback is much appreciated. One of my first experiments into long exposure, any recommendations to try changes would be cool.

| Current Gear (external link) |
| Vimeo (external link) | The Daily Discipline (external link) | Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natums
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
739 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:31 |  #2

bump for feedback...


| Current Gear (external link) |
| Vimeo (external link) | The Daily Discipline (external link) | Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
squashed
Goldmember
Avatar
4,317 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 3201
Joined Oct 2006
Location: MidEastCali
     
Dec 27, 2010 23:41 |  #3

They look great but it looks like the horizon is not level in #1 and #3..


Done with Numbers. Own the X and the R
http://www.garyyoungph​otography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natums
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
739 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 28, 2010 02:49 |  #4

noted, does it have a significant image quality impact to rotate the canvas 2-3 degrees in post? I would imagine that would have serious ramifications to the full size image, though when compressed for web I guess it would probably be a moot point.

I shot my car just a couple hrs ago to try out some more long exposure. Do you recommend keeping the ISO below 800 for long exposure, I noticed measurably more grain in my pics with ISO at 800, in both shoots. Which seemed rather surprising to me since I always thought 800 was a moderate ISO for DSLRs.


| Current Gear (external link) |
| Vimeo (external link) | The Daily Discipline (external link) | Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snitty
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Dec 28, 2010 05:06 |  #5

If you shot in RAW and are rotating using ACR or Lightroom you shouldn't notice any problem.

As for the images themselves, I'm not really digging any of the waterworld shots. Can't quite put my finger on why, it may be how overpowering the foreground is compared to the background, it may just be a taste thing.

The last one is better, I'd just clone out the contrail on the top left.


Canon T2i, 50mm f/1.8, Sigma 20mm f/1.8, 105mm f/2.8 Macro, 50-200mm f/4-5.6, 18-55 kit lens, 430 EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natums
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
739 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 28, 2010 16:37 |  #6

Thanks, yeah I saw that as a problem throughout shooting, wasn't able to get an even light balance, tried as best I can.

Forgot to switch back to RAW, was shooting random crap before and didn't want to waste space in RAW. Would have made a big difference, but I just took the jpgs straight from the camera and posted em.


| Current Gear (external link) |
| Vimeo (external link) | The Daily Discipline (external link) | Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Dec 28, 2010 22:42 |  #7

My eye just wanders around in all of these shots. There's no real concept to them, so the eye struggles to find things to connect and tell a story.

Harsh contrasting scenes are hard to shoot, and give something for the eye to focus on. Honestly, I'd keep your ISO at 100 most of the time. I'd only bump ISO up to pick up ambient light like stars etc. Otherwise, sticking at 100 and adjusting your shutter times will work better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natums
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
739 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 29, 2010 04:51 |  #8

Yeah, I was having trouble trying to find things to focus on while shooting which really showed in the final product.

Will try keeping the ISO at 100, I was doing 200 a lot the other night when I took a few more pics of my car this time:

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5248/5300046598_c0e5e9b7c4_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5284/5300046762_cba87844b8_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5209/5300047640_87f8277556_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5007/5300048026_768057ffbc_b.jpg

A lot of these I did touch up in post this time. The headlights of passing cars was a little over powering so I lowered the highlights and tweaked sharpness slightly. I wasn't as patient as I could have been, I had been wanting to shoot at those locations for a while and just wanted to go give it a test run.

| Current Gear (external link) |
| Vimeo (external link) | The Daily Discipline (external link) | Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeutronBoy
Goldmember
2,052 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
Location: LI, NY
     
Dec 29, 2010 07:57 |  #9

first car picture is mildly interesting. Others seem to be snapshots. The white wall is overpowering in the last shot.


Sony A7C, Sony A6000, 5D Mark II, 40D, 350d
Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS II L | Canon 100-400 IS L [COLOR=black]| Canon 24-70 L | Canon 100mm Macro f2.8 | Canon 50 f1.4| Canon 10-22 | Canon MP-E 65 | Rokinon 14mm f2.8 | Sigma 17 - 70 macro
MT-24 & 430 flashes | other junk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,888 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Long Exposures from Universal Studios Rooftop
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1119 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.