Got a new T2i for Christmas and been practicing on the cat.
Other than the overblown background what else can be done to improve.
Used 18-55 kit lens and a little work in the software that came with the camera.
Any C & C is welcome.
Thanks,
Randall
TRACER Member 96 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2010 More info | Dec 28, 2010 11:37 | #1 Got a new T2i for Christmas and been practicing on the cat. Randall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwsimpson Goldmember 2,471 posts Likes: 60 Joined Jun 2010 Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA More info | Dec 28, 2010 11:43 | #2 looks soft, and I think your white balance is off. what were your camera settings?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peano Goldmember 1,778 posts Likes: 133 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Dec 28, 2010 12:21 | #3 A reflector in front and a little to the right would have helped with shadow details in the face and also would have toned down the background some (because the brighter face would need a smaller aperture). Try a piece of white cardboard or even the dull side of a piece of aluminum foil. If Miss Kitty doesn't object, place it 18" or so from the face. ---
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for the feedback. Randall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peano Goldmember 1,778 posts Likes: 133 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Dec 28, 2010 12:52 | #5 |
tcusta00 Senior Member 339 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | Dec 28, 2010 13:01 | #6 TRACER wrote in post #11528972 Thanks for the feedback. Camera settings: 5.6 1/30 ISO 1600 Focal Length 55 mm Shot Manual in RAW The cause of the softness? High ISO, quality of the lens, all of the above! More likely my skills or lack thereof. If you're handholding and/or shooting a moving target like an animal you can't reliably have a shutter speed of 1/30 and eliminate motion blur. At least I can't.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwsimpson Goldmember 2,471 posts Likes: 60 Joined Jun 2010 Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA More info | Dec 28, 2010 13:14 | #7 it's not super-noisy, so I wouldn't blame the high ISO. I'd say it's a combination of shooting at 1/30sec shutter and f/5.6... mainly the shutter speed. you definitely need to be faster than that (usual rule is shutter speed should be the inverse of the focal length, in your case ~1/60 of a sec.).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
"Yikes! That makes no sense." Randall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Peano Goldmember 1,778 posts Likes: 133 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Dec 28, 2010 14:32 | #9 TRACER wrote in post #11529490 "Yikes! That makes no sense." Not sure what you mean on this statement, could you explain a bit. Thanks. Yes, with bright sunlight, you should be able to shoot at a much lower ISO. If you can't, then you need either fill flash or (as I suggested before) a reflector to get more of that sunlight on your dark subject. ---
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robertwsimpson Goldmember 2,471 posts Likes: 60 Joined Jun 2010 Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA More info | Dec 28, 2010 14:36 | #10 weird. I was going to suggest using ISO3200 and 1/60sec shutter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
@Peano-Gotcha. Thanks. Randall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Dec 28, 2010 19:50 | #12 There doesn't appear to be anything in focus in the image - a good indicator of camera shake. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1121 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||