Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 28 Dec 2010 (Tuesday) 14:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

C+C need to know if these are as nice...

 
RazorbackSam
Senior Member
353 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Arkansas
     
Dec 28, 2010 14:38 |  #1

as I think they are... i've got thick skin so let me know what you really think...

1.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

2.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

3.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

4.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

5.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

6.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

7.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

[Canon 7D | 24-70mm 2.8 L | 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | 18-135 3.5~5.6 IS | 28mm 1.8 | 50mm 1.8 | Manfrotto 055XPROB Legs - 222 Head | Manfrotto 060B MonoPod
www.settlephotos.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwsimpson
Goldmember
Avatar
2,471 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Jun 2010
Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA
     
Dec 28, 2010 14:45 |  #2

they're nice enough...

you cheated on #6 though ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Dec 28, 2010 14:50 |  #3

They're pretty good, but could be a bit better in a couple of spots. The first one is underexposed on their faces a bit. The vignette is a bit much in the third. In the shots of them sitting in the middle of the road, I hope there is some significance to the out of focus building because otherwise its kinda blah. I would like the phone shot better if the phone wasnt in front her face.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RazorbackSam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
353 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Arkansas
     
Dec 28, 2010 19:40 |  #4

robertwsimpson wrote in post #11529668 (external link)
they're nice enough...
you cheated on #6 though ;)

got me... but every time I have tried that with a couple where I didn't take the pic first it never works out because of the movement of "two cameras" in the same shot..

gonzogolf wrote in post #11529700 (external link)
They're pretty good, but could be a bit better in a couple of spots. The first one is underexposed on their faces a bit. The vignette is a bit much in the third. In the shots of them sitting in the middle of the road, I hope there is some significance to the out of focus building because otherwise its kinda blah. I would like the phone shot better if the phone wasnt in front her face.

yeah, I guess it is a little... i'll see if I can correct in PP. And I can see what you are saying about the vignette, although I was actually going for that effect. Also the building in the background does have a large significance... these are in Fayetteville AR... and that is Old Main (external link) - the couple have lived very close to the University for decades now and are HUGE Arkansas Razorback fans... additionally the pictures of them standing on the street are of a "locally" famous street that is full of nightlife Dickson Street (external link) so there is alot of significance to most all the shots... the couple LOVES them, and can't stop raving about them, and I really like most of them too so that is why I was curious to get an objective opinion.


[Canon 7D | 24-70mm 2.8 L | 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | 18-135 3.5~5.6 IS | 28mm 1.8 | 50mm 1.8 | Manfrotto 055XPROB Legs - 222 Head | Manfrotto 060B MonoPod
www.settlephotos.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,781 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NH, USA
     
Dec 28, 2010 19:51 |  #5

Not bad, #2 is odd because he isn't even looking at her but possibly someone else walking across the street. I like the idea of #6 but it is obvious it isn't live view of what your looking at right then. I agree #3 is a bit dark but I do like #4 the best.


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cameronrinut
Member
132 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Ogden, UT
     
Dec 29, 2010 11:56 |  #6

I think one of the hardest things I'm trying to work with on my portraits is to make the subject look their best. I like the side profile of the woman in #2 since her eyes are a little different. I might recommend more where it's her side profile looking up at him. ? just my $0.02.


5D MKII-Gripped / T2i / 17-40f/4L / 28-300f/3.5-5L IS / 70-200f/4L / canon 2x II extender / Cheapo 600-1300 Telephoto+2x converter / carbon fiber kick A tripod / a partridge in a pear tree.
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dr1ft
Senior Member
Avatar
284 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Dec 29, 2010 12:18 |  #7

I don't think #6 is possible unless he has a 10 foot arm :)


-Vik
http://www.sejvik.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalSpecialist
Goldmember
Avatar
2,286 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Finding a New World, thru my camera
     
Dec 29, 2010 12:18 |  #8

Ah young love! Glad to see someone taking couples photos for an upward generation. I will agree with some previous comments. This is just some good work all together however. I love the double yellow line shots, nice idea to show two parties coming together in parallel.


JIM
EOS 630, 1N, 1DsMkII, and 5D/wgrip and some L glass.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shockey
Goldmember
1,187 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Boise Idaho
     
Dec 29, 2010 12:20 |  #9

Looks like everyday walking around shots, nothing special.
Couple looks they are having fun.


___________
Boise Portrait Photographer
www.alloutdoor.smugmug​.com (external link)
www.aoboudoirboise.smu​gmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,440 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
C+C need to know if these are as nice...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
830 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.