Dear Forum members
I have lenses and my ‘dilemma’ as shown in signature below.
Recently went on a family holiday and when outdoors used Tokina12-24 as walk around lens on two days & canon 50mm as walk around lens on one day. Carried all three lenses outdoor and was lazy to switch lenses (Frequently changed lenses when indoors only).
I have counted number of photographs taken in various focal lengths (FL) (I have grouped FLs to aid in decision making):
Tokina12-24
12mm: 29 nos
13-15mm: 26 nos
16-19mm: 43 nos
20-23mm : 36nos
24 mm : 31 nos
Canon 50mm : 33 nos
Sigma 18-200 : 3 nos (100-130mm)
Prior to above study, I was planning to sell above 3 lenses & buy instead Canon 17-55. Post above study – I am worried that I may miss 12-17 mm.
Are there forum members who made similar decision and what is there experience of reducing their focal range on wider side. Further is canon 17-55 at par or superior in IQ to Tokina & Canon 50mm.
Any comments / help / recommendations on the issue will be appreciated. (Assumptions – limited funds, photographing family & friends)

