Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 29 Dec 2010 (Wednesday) 16:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Artifacts in jpeg but not in RAW

 
ArcticShooter
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Dec 29, 2010 16:10 |  #1

I have adjusted the exposure on the original raw image with +3 stops.
I know it's a lot!
Added sharpening to bring out the stars.
The foreground is a bit out of focus due to my poor eye vision due to laser surgery earlier this month...

But when I saved in 8bit jpeg it showed the artifacts.
Is must be the processing that causes this?
It was saved at max size


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 29, 2010 16:20 |  #2

What was the image quality you were set to?

And, do the artifacts show when viewing at enlarged sizes?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ArcticShooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Dec 29, 2010 16:28 |  #3

tonylong wrote in post #11536797 (external link)
What was the image quality you were set to?
12
And, do the artifacts show when viewing at enlarged sizes?

yes, but this image also have lots of noise in it


Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,597 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1542
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Dec 29, 2010 17:05 |  #4

What app was used to sharpen? It looks like ringing from some funky sharpening method.


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 29, 2010 17:31 |  #5

ArcticShooter wrote in post #11536845 (external link)
yes, but this image also have lots of noise in it

Heh! That comes from raising the exposure by 3 stops! You might want to try an alternative approach to boosting the stars, unless you are after that brightened/noisy sky -- maybe noise reduction will ease the pain there.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ArcticShooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Dec 30, 2010 02:47 |  #6

tonylong wrote in post #11537161 (external link)
Heh! That comes from raising the exposure by 3 stops! You might want to try an alternative approach to boosting the stars, unless you are after that brightened/noisy sky -- maybe noise reduction will ease the pain there.

Any ideas on what approach? I don't need the sky so bright but I want the meteors to show


Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ArcticShooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Dec 30, 2010 08:28 |  #7

Here is my 2nd try.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5047/5306093447_33ce31615f_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/articshooter/5​306093447/  (external link)

Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Dec 30, 2010 08:42 |  #8

First looks like moiré. Is it visible at 100% view?

Probably caused by pattern noise at just the wrong frequency.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ArcticShooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø)
     
Dec 30, 2010 08:46 |  #9

René Damkot wrote in post #11540486 (external link)
First looks like moiré. Is it visible at 100% view?

Probably caused by pattern noise at just the wrong frequency.

Yes it is visible at 50%. At 100% the noise overtaking everything so it difficult to see.
I am quite happy with the newest version


Helge
Summer is great :)

My gearMy (external link)Flickr  (external link) (external link)G+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,230 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Artifacts in jpeg but not in RAW
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1491 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.