Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 31 Dec 2010 (Friday) 18:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

file naming conventions

 
kingdavidd
Member
217 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Dec 31, 2010 18:17 |  #1

hi all,

i just installed aperture 3, and am getting ready to import my pictures. i wanted to ask what you guys and gals use for filenames? do you rename, or just use the camera default, or if you rename; what format do you use?

thanks for your input!


7D | EF 24-105L f4 | Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 | Tamron 18-250 f3.5-6.3 | 270 EX | Slik Sprint Pro ii | Gitzo GT1541 with Manfrotto Head 496rc2
wish list: 70-200 f2.8 IS ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Dec 31, 2010 19:07 |  #2

I leave them as the camera names them. I sort by folder so duplicate names is not a problem. (the camera starts over after 9999.) I will name the folder to the event. 1 event to 1 folder.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Dec 31, 2010 19:54 as a reply to  @ Mark1's post |  #3

I rename every image. Irrespective of body I have a sequential number, followed by a text of the month/year or the shoot title and then followed by the cameras original file name. It would look something like 108487_Dec09_D3s2498.c​r2. I copy from my card to a folder on my hard drive and then use Breezebrowser Pro which has a terrific renaming function and always remembers the last sequential number used so it can pick up where it last left off. I do store on my hard drive by year and month but in reality it is not that important as if I need to find an image I will refer to my catalog which will pickup by date, keyword, etc. It is very easy for me to find a shot, irrespective of its folder location. I don't use Aperture so can't comment on that application.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Createsean
Senior Member
Avatar
994 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Toronto
     
Dec 31, 2010 19:58 |  #4

yy-month-###

special events like vacation get yy-eventname-###


I'm looking for harsh criticism of my photos - tell me how to improve, I will be grateful.
My Gear | My web development business Caffeine Creations (external link) | flickr (external link) |My Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkuenning
Goldmember
Avatar
1,505 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Claremont (near LA), California
     
Jan 01, 2011 07:44 |  #5

Everything is date-named. I use a leading "P" (for picture) partly so the filename isn't all-numeric and mostly for historical reasons. Then the date and time come in yyyy.mm.dd-hh.mm.ss format so that pictures will sort in date order. Then a 4-digit image number that's directly from the camera sequence. Finally, "-bw", "-hdr", "-stitched", "-processed", "-forweb", "-cropped", "-forweb", etc. for stuff that I've postprocessed. So in the end I'll have something like P2010.08.23-14.32.20-4392.cr2 which gets processed to P2010.08.23-14.32.20-4392-bw.jpg.

The original purpose of date-naming was to let me look things up by date (I often have a good idea of when the shot I want was taken). The other advantage is that it guarantees me unique names for every file; none of this garbage of having "IMG_0001.JPG" reappear every 10K clicks.


Geoff
All I want is a 10-2000 f/0.5L with no distortion that weighs 100 grams, fits in my pocket, and costs $300. Is that too much to ask?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Jan 01, 2011 07:57 |  #6

I always rename. I use Downloader Pro to move my files from my card reader to my hard drive and I have it configured to rename all my files. I use the XXX_YYYYMMDD_#### format where:

XXX are my initials
YYYYMMDD is the date the file was created in standard ISO format (this is read directly from the file metadata)
#### is a four-digit sequence number generated by Downloader Pro.

Even when I use 3 cameras to shoot events I'll never shoot more than 9,999 frame in any given day so all my files have unique names that cannot be duplicated.

You're going to get varying suggestions so I'd strongly suggest you get a copy of Peter Krogh's "The DAM Book: Digital Asset Management for Photographers (external link)" and study it. Alternatively you can also visit his website and see what he suggests: http://thedambook.com/​smf/index.php (external link)

The renaming format I use is the one recommended by Krogh. Job codes etc. are added to the IPTC metadata rather than to the folder name.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom_D
Goldmember
Avatar
1,425 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Napa ~ on the edge of retirement.
     
Jan 01, 2011 18:22 |  #7

I like YYYYMMDD_Job_#### and use Downloader Pro to do this as well as organize photos in folders by YYYY/MM_Month/DD_Job.

DLP also does the CR2 to DNG conversion but as I save both files they have the same name and I can always get back to the CR2.

DLP also writes the camera filename to IPTC fields for the VERY rare times I shoot in RAW and JPEG for someone that needs the JPEG right away.


Gallery (external link)
7DMkII, 40D, 17-55, 70-200 f/2.8 IS and more...
More Wag, Less Bark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,194 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
file naming conventions
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1068 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.