Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 01 Jan 2011 (Saturday) 07:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Few snaps, any good?

 
kaptnkain
Senior Member
985 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jan 01, 2011 07:25 |  #1

Going through my photos from a week ago, decided to edit a few. What do you think, do these hold any photogenic value, or are they just snapshots? Thanks.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


1. Easy Shot

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


2. Long shot

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


3. I'd rather die...

- Ilya
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aquaman
Senior Member
Avatar
619 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 53
Joined Apr 2006
Location: New Richmond, Wisconsin
     
Jan 01, 2011 10:20 |  #2

#1 and #2 were appealing. Good lighting and use of the shadows. The depth of field contributed to the nice composition.

#3 didn't do anything for me.


Canon 7dii with an EFs 17-55; EF 50 1.8; EF 70-200 f2.8L; and EF 300L
www.wiphotoclub.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Schell
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
     
Jan 01, 2011 10:23 |  #3

Nice composure. Nice lighting. Each photo conveys a mood. It's not an easy thing to do. Kudos.


Website (external link) || Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
misterkevlar
Member
136 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 01, 2011 17:33 |  #4

1 & 2 are really good and the effects used are real nice




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaptnkain
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jan 01, 2011 18:54 |  #5

Thanks for your honest opinions guys! :)


- Ilya
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bang ­ Bang ­ Boy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,347 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: South Africa
     
Jan 01, 2011 19:54 |  #6

1st one is very nice, great bokeh and georgeous DOF. The other two are good but the first one is really good.


Lots of old stuff but hey I am a student
Photojournalist in Johannesburg.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jan 01, 2011 20:18 as a reply to  @ Bang Bang Boy's post |  #7

I'd like to see #1 with the cue ball, rather than the shooter, in sharp focus.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaptnkain
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jan 01, 2011 20:45 |  #8

The reason I went with the head in focus is because I felt that if the cue ball was in focus, the out of focus head would be very distracting.


- Ilya
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

771 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Few snaps, any good?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2810 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.