I'm considering purchasing this tripod, and have been unable to find a specification that is of interest.
Can anyone tell me the diameter of the top platform (mounting base) ?
Thanks. 
hammer418 Goldmember More info | Jan 02, 2011 13:01 | #1 I'm considering purchasing this tripod, and have been unable to find a specification that is of interest. Strangers are just friends that you've never met .... I'm Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Michel_D Hatchling 7 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Jan 02, 2011 14:32 | #2 Hi,
Canon 1D mk IV - 5D mk III - 500 f4L - 70-200 f2.8LIS - 24-105 f4L - 24-70 f2.8L - 135 f2L - 50 f1.4 - Samyang 8mm 3.5 Asph Fisheye - 580 ex - PW Flex TT5 & Mini TT1 - 1.4 TC - Gitzo GT3541XLS + GS3511S - Wimberley Gimbal Type Tripod Head II - Kenko tube set - LensCoat Realtree max4 HD - Pelican 1514 - Audio-Technica Pro-24CM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 02, 2011 16:20 | #3 Thanks Michel_D ..... that's exactly what I was looking for. Strangers are just friends that you've never met .... I'm Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Doslyn Member 108 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | Which head are you considering using with this tripod? I ordered the 3541LS from Amazon but it is currently on backorder. I guess you will be using this without a center column, is that right?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 02, 2011 19:32 | #5 I wanted to check the compatability with an older 3-way panhead that I own, but will most likely buy a Markins ballhead for this new pod. Strangers are just friends that you've never met .... I'm Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 03, 2011 12:24 | #6 Michel is correct, the top of the 3541XLS and 3541XL are the same. I bought a 3541LS three weeks ago and the outside diameter of the circular base on mine is 80.5mm and the diameter of the raised black circular head mounting area is 70.5mm. In the short time that I've owned it I've been seriously impressed, but I would recommend a NatureScapes Safety Plate for the loose base plate tension screw issue to be absolutely on the safe side. ~Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cam101 Senior Member 615 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Mar 04, 2011 14:06 | #7 Can anyone tell me what the difference is between the 3541LS and the 3541XLS is? In essence, what does the X mean? Is it only added length? Canon R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroshooter1970 Cream of the Crop 7,494 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Arizona More info | Mar 04, 2011 14:13 | #8 Cam101 wrote in post #11956105 Can anyone tell me what the difference is between the 3541LS and the 3541XLS is? In essence, what does the X mean? Is it only added length? It means it's Extra Long
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cam101 Senior Member 615 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Mar 04, 2011 14:29 | #9 Great thanks! Canon R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroshooter1970 Cream of the Crop 7,494 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Arizona More info | Mar 04, 2011 14:31 | #10 You're welcome.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Russ61 Senior Member 265 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Tacoma, WA area More info | Mar 04, 2011 17:29 | #11 The XLS is 20" taller than the LS if all 4 sections are fully extended, ie 78" height (I can walk under mine!). It's also 6" longer folded, 1/2 lb heavier, and $100 (full retail) more expensive but otherwise the same. I normally shoot using only the highest (ie thickest) 3 leg sections extended. For me where I often shoot in mountainous terrain where level surfaces are fantasy, the ability to utilize a leg extension (or 2) on uneven terrain has been indispensable. Its also nice when shooting overhead shots, where the viewfinder is considerably lower than as if viewing horizontally or slightly down, to be able to raise the 4th leg sections. I've used the 4th section(s) much more than I originally estimated. I'm 6'1".
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Candor Goldmember More info | Mar 04, 2011 17:39 | #12 ^^^ I would agree with Russ. The XLS is very handy in certain situations. I also use it a lot on the edge of banks next to water where one leg will be extended into the water. I'm 5'8' and glad I went with the XLS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cam101 Senior Member 615 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Mar 04, 2011 22:03 | #13 Hmmmm... interesting. The local store is having a great sale on tripods, so I picked up the 3541LS... but now im thinking the 3541XLS may have been better. This tripod is not meant to be ultra portable (within reason)... though an extra 6'' is substantial. Canon R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1062 guests, 110 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||