Is buying San Disk CF's from amazon a safe bet?
it is 20 $ cheaper than B&H per 8GB card
Jan 05, 2011 14:37 | #16 Is buying San Disk CF's from amazon a safe bet? flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ledhed Goldmember 1,929 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Apsley, On. CAN. More info | Jan 05, 2011 14:42 | #17 hieu1004 wrote in post #11573387 Transcend 400x have been working great for me. Fast, reliable and inexpensive. I was a long time Sandisk user until recently. B&H and Newegg generally have good prices on them. i just bought one as well, works fine and cheaply priced compared to those other crooks. Rob - "a photographer is a painter, in a hurry!"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 05, 2011 16:25 | #18 Just ordered a 8GB Transcend 600X flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hieu1004 Goldmember 3,579 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Seattle More info | Jan 05, 2011 16:27 | #19 |
Staszek Goldmember 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Jan 05, 2011 17:58 | #20 I use the Sandisk 60 mb/sec cards because I shoot a lot of sports in raw. I've never had a problem with he buffer filling up, but I also never hold the shutter button down for more than 4 frames. SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kilaf15 Junior Member 24 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Another vote for the Transcend 400X (16 & 32gb). Used for both stills and video in my 7D and 5DmkII. I frequently shoot 7D burst sequences up to 1.5 secs and have recorded a continuous 30 minute video with no hiccups. 5D MkIII | 7D | 10-22 | 17-55 | 24-105L | 70-200 2.8L II | 430exii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Justaddwata Goldmember 1,330 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Stralian - In Rhode IsIand More info | I have a great 32GB Transcend which only reads/writes 15gb. The other 17gb -missing pics. Restoration software wont restore, formatting only reads 15gb. Proudly Australian Made!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gotchaforce Mostly Lurking 17 posts Joined Jun 2006 More info | Jan 07, 2011 13:02 | #23 Justaddwata wrote in post #11592697 I have a great 32GB Transcend which only reads/writes 15gb. The other 17gb -missing pics. Restoration software wont restore, formatting only reads 15gb. True it is under warranty but lost some faith in Transcend as a result. ![]() Sandisk has never given me concern - and I will pay a little extra for that. uhh where did you buy it? What you describe is EXACTLY what happens when you buy a fake card. They take a smaller card and then overwrite the firmware so it reads as a 32gb on windows but in reality its a smaller card.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hieu1004 Goldmember 3,579 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Seattle More info | Jan 07, 2011 13:08 | #24 |
Jan 07, 2011 13:20 | #25 TheMirrorMan wrote in post #11575628 I have extreme IV 40 MB sec cards. They have made my 40D out perform the specs on the camera. Im intrested what how the faster CF cards are helping the 40D outperform the specs? I beleive the burst length is limited by the buffer size no card speed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Justaddwata Goldmember 1,330 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Stralian - In Rhode IsIand More info | Jan 07, 2011 15:29 | #26 Gotchaforce wrote in post #11592954 uhh where did you buy it? What you describe is EXACTLY what happens when you buy a fake card. They take a smaller card and then overwrite the firmware so it reads as a 32gb on windows but in reality its a smaller card. Purchased from Newegg - Was reading and writing 32gb for the first few uses - I do/did have pictures filling the other missing 17gb. I have no questions as to its authenticity - it is its performance that has disappointed. Proudly Australian Made!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Panda_stunter Goldmember 1,449 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Sin City More info | Jan 07, 2011 15:50 | #27 drama wrote in post #11573970 I wont be doing a a lot of FPS shooting either The number of RAW images per card & to avoid any shot to shot delay is my priority 16gb will do u good if that's ur priority. I use 2 of them and spare cars are all gb. Gear List and Feedbacks MM#1909309
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 07, 2011 16:42 | #28 Does the old adage, smaller cards are more reliable still hold true? flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Staszek Goldmember 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Jan 07, 2011 17:07 | #29 drama wrote in post #11594352 Does the old adage, smaller cards are more reliable still hold true? I am torn between 8 & 16 GB for my second card, the 16 GB's are at a very attractive price point now The cards themselves are no different. Its just that if you shoot 16 GB and the card tanks, you will still have 8GB with the smaller cards. With the large card, you may be out everything. SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Larger cards mean more possibility for larger data loss vs the flexibility offered by larger cards.I always format, previously had data corruption and lost a shoot, cured me from deleting for good flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1896 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||