Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 06 Jan 2011 (Thursday) 02:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New S90/g12/lx5 killer from olympus

 
mjperini
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Bucks County, Pennsylvania and Montauk NY
     
Jan 07, 2011 15:12 |  #16

I have resisted buying a point & shoot for all the same shortcomings that everyone has pointed out.
We own a bunch typical ones in our family and never found them much better than the camera in my iPhone 4.
I was given an S95 by my kids recently.
I would say this: the size is about perfect as the largest object one can comfortably place in a pocket of a business suit and not be obvious. I took it to a VERY dark restaurant on new years eve and was frankly amazed at the quality of the pictures & video (AV f/2 28mm) I made no great effort at camera steadiness and was surprised to see pictures that were quite good at f/2, 1/13 sec, iso 1600. I did some SD video that was surprisingly good, both indoors and outdor night traffic etc.
For sharing purposes SD video has many advantages & I haven't even used the 720p capability.
For 1080p I'm not sure a P&S would be my first choice.
I own 1Ds III's & a 7D. It's clearly not in that league but I'm very impressed.
The Lumix or the Olympus might be even better, but in my opinion there would be many more times when I wouldn't carry those..
For many years I travelled with a little Olympus XA clamshell with a 35mm f/2.8 this camera reminds me of that one.
I do miss an eyelevel viewfinder, and if you have big hands (I don't) it borders on being too small (but if you have big hands you might also have bigger pockets)
It's not a perfect camera, but a surprisingly good one.
To those contemplating the purchase of one of these from any manufacturer, my advice would be this:
1,They're all very capable (though I only have direct experience with one)
2.My opinion is that the primary advantage of this type of camera is that it can be WITH YOU more than your big cameras.
3.The key to choosing the right one is more about being really honest with yourself about how big is too big to carry all the time. ---I know I'd love a viewfinder but I also know I'd carry one with an EVF less. (I've even experimented with carrying the fold flat waist level Hasselblad viewfinder in my other pocket)
4. The reason I feel this way is because (it's my opinion) If I know that I'm going somewhere with good photographic potential an S95 or similar camera will never be the camera of choice.(it may be the camera of necessity)
So the pocket camera's PRIMARY VALUE is acceptable image quality in a package that you are LIKELY to carry. This "size" will vary by person, for ME the S95 hits the sweet spot of Size/quality
Just one person's opinion.
Michael


Michael
1Ds Mk III, 40D, 7D,17-55, 17-40, 24-70, 70-200 2.8 IS,35 1.4, 50 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 100 f2, 70-300 f4-5.6
100 Macro,135 f/2,135 2.8 SF, 90 TS ,MT 24, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jan 07, 2011 15:39 |  #17

^^^^(i didnt want to quote you cause what you type was so large.) :)


You make a very good point! What good is a camera if you dont have it with you! I think the new oly could be something that i would possibly always have with me, but i would REALLY have to see it in real life in order to know for sure. The LX5 seemed almost perfect for me. Im still leaning towrds it due to it having a 24mm wide angle over a 28....Its a hard choice! competition is good!


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mjperini
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Bucks County, Pennsylvania and Montauk NY
     
Jan 07, 2011 18:39 |  #18

Combatmedic
I notice you shoot with a D700.
I'm familliar with the high ISO performance of the D700, you won't see anything like that. My comments were more against my expectations for a tiny camera and against the many little Nikon & Canon P&S cameras my family has had over the years.
Re Size: Only you can decide how big is too big for you - but if it's a toss up, go with smaller.
I've probably shot 100 pictures total over the past week or so, and 95+% of them are 28mm @ f/2
It's a pleasing wide field view and I try to zoom with my feet..
Now, as I said, the choice was made for me, it was a gift. Left to my own devices, I'd probably still be waiting, the steady march of technology has taught us that there is always a newer better one around the corner. So it's easy not to dive in. I'm happy for the gift.
One other issue is that these are all deep and powerful little machines with deeply nested sets of functions and too few direct controls, but each has a bit of customization.
Another differentiator is to pick the way you would like to work with the camera and see which of them best fits your style.
For me, it's RAW, 28mm f/2 AV mode, Auto iso with limits, flash off most of the time, dial in exposure comp. --I do fumble around turning the flash on & off
Speaking of fumbling around, -for a camera with good low light performance , it's black on black motif and tiny buttons are impossible to see in the dark,-- so having a predominent way of working is even more important.
I hope this helps
Michael


Michael
1Ds Mk III, 40D, 7D,17-55, 17-40, 24-70, 70-200 2.8 IS,35 1.4, 50 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 100 f2, 70-300 f4-5.6
100 Macro,135 f/2,135 2.8 SF, 90 TS ,MT 24, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:53 |  #19

Not shooting with the D700 yet...it should be at my steps tomorrow(switched from a 5dmk1). I have shot with it and its iso is very very good. I wouldnt expect that out of a point and shoot. maybe in the next 5 year. but not right now. :)

I'd use the point and shoot for hiking when i dont feel like carrying the extra 5 pounds.


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 09, 2011 18:28 |  #20

Holy shoot, this is amazing. I figured I'd hold onto my s95 for several years at least, but this is something I'll really have to think about!


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jan 22, 2011 12:17 |  #21

XZ-1 Began shipping yesterday and arriving at stores today in EU. There are a couple of people that have it now and are going to compare with with the LX5. B&H also now has it for pre order which means its launch isnt to far away in the US! I dont think ive ever been this excited about a P&S!! Hahahaha.
From the reviews ive read so far... Look to be the exact same as the LX5 in IQ and noise(so usable P&S wise to ISO800 like the rest) (which is a shame since oly put the new true pic v processor in it.)

Bad things i have heard are.... no AE/EC button and can only bracket +/- 1.7. (Though i have seen video's that show EC on the rear screen)
The ND filter affects the IQ at and only at 28mm 1.8.


Good things
Can zoom making video's
AF's making videos
The lens is pretty dang good. At its best at F4....diffraction starts at 6.3
The AF is just as fast as the Pens...Which is a very good thing. Very good AF.
Picture tones are very good.


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 22, 2011 14:35 |  #22

Combatmedic870 wrote in post #11692363 (external link)
XZ-1 Began shipping yesterday and arriving at stores today in EU. There are a couple of people that have it now and are going to compare with with the LX5. B&H also now has it for pre order which means its launch isnt to far away in the US! I dont think ive ever been this excited about a P&S!! Hahahaha.
From the reviews ive read so far... Look to be the exact same as the LX5 in IQ and noise(so usable P&S wise to ISO800 like the rest) (which is a shame since oly put the new true pic v processor in it.)

Bad things i have heard are.... no AE/EC button and can only bracket +/- 1.7. (Though i have seen video's that show EC on the rear screen)
The ND filter affects the IQ at and only at 28mm 1.8.

Good things
Can zoom making video's
AF's making videos
The lens is pretty dang good. At its best at F4....diffraction starts at 6.3
The AF is just as fast as the Pens...Which is a very good thing. Very good AF.
Picture tones are very good.

To me, the AF speed is extremely important. Saying it's as fast as the e-pens is nothing to brag about unfortunately :D When I had my e-p1, I was constantly groaning due to missed shots, thanks to the horrendously slow AF. Without a doubt, the AF on my s95 was much faster.

Still, the point of this camera wouldn't be for action photography (at least for me), but as a do-everything compact, especially for low-light. I can't wait to see some reviews!


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jan 22, 2011 15:41 |  #23

MOkoFOko wrote in post #11693066 (external link)
To me, the AF speed is extremely important. Saying it's as fast as the e-pens is nothing to brag about unfortunately :D When I had my e-p1, I was constantly groaning due to missed shots, thanks to the horrendously slow AF. Without a doubt, the AF on my s95 was much faster.

Still, the point of this camera wouldn't be for action photography (at least for me), but as a do-everything compact, especially for low-light. I can't wait to see some reviews!

well...there are reviews out right now...Most say the AF speed is faster then the LX5...So to me that is important since these are the 2 im considering.
Do a Google search for the last week "olympus XZ-1 reviews".

I found alot of stuff.

Heres the aperture changes vs FL

Around about in this area, might me off by a mm here and there. I got this from an owner of a xz-1 on dpreview. He told me when the F stops changed, I filled in the gaps

28mm 1.8 - 34mm 1.8
35mm 2.0 - 64mm 2.0
65mm 2.2 - 95mm 2.2
96mm 2.5 - 112mm 2.5

with about 16 steps zooming(if you want it to step)


Oh! people with worries about the lens cap check this out!!!

http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1295732​586&sr=8-2 (external link)

They have auto lens caps like that with the tl500 as well.

Im sure it wont take long for the olympus to have one as well!

I also read a review saying the lens cap will pop off when you turn the camera on. You just got to put it back on...or get one of the ^^^^


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jan 22, 2011 15:53 |  #24

Heres where i got alot of info from

http://www.dslrmagazin​e.com …ympus-xz-1-la-prueba.html (external link)


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 22, 2011 15:53 |  #25

Combatmedic870 wrote in post #11693438 (external link)
well...there are reviews out right now...Most say the AF speed is faster then the LX5...So to me that is important since these are the 2 im considering.
Do a Google search for the last week "olympus XZ-1 reviews".

I found alot of stuff.

Heres the aperture changes vs FL

Around about in this area, might me off by a mm here and there. I got this from an owner of a xz-1 on dpreview. He told me when the F stops changed, I filled in the gaps

28mm 1.8 - 34mm 1.8
35mm 2.0 - 64mm 2.0
65mm 2.2 - 95mm 2.2
96mm 2.5 - 112mm 2.5

with about 16 steps zooming(if you want it to step)


Oh! people with worries about the lens cap check this out!!!

http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1295732​586&sr=8-2 (external link)

They have auto lens caps like that with the tl500 as well.

Im sure it wont take long for the olympus to have one as well!

I also read a review saying the lens cap will pop off when you turn the camera on. You just got to put it back on...or get one of the ^^^^

That "lens cap" is superb! I was about to comment on the annoyance of having to always cap a P&S for quick pictures, but such a product would make that irrelevant.

The maximum apertures are highly impressive at all focal lengths. I can't wait to see how this thing performs in low-light conditions--even zoomed out!!


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jan 22, 2011 15:58 |  #26

Translated from spanish review about AF speed


We can say, and not without reason, that's why there are cameras like the E-PEN E-PL1 and PL2 .... but neither is the same size or brightness and versatility of the zoom are equivalent.

Regarding the autofocus, the options can be selected focal points, either automatically, either in our selection of hot spot location.
No complaints on speed and accuracy of focus, rather the opposite: it has seemed faster than the competing proposals.

Measuring and setting targets
Appear to be aspects that are taken for granted, and while SLR cameras and compact system ("mirrorless" Micro Four Thirds, etc.). the thing is certain, in compact results are not always as reliable ... except for the XZ-1 from Olympus.


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Jan 22, 2011 16:07 |  #27

MOkoFOko wrote in post #11693502 (external link)
That "lens cap" is superb! I was about to comment on the annoyance of having to always cap a P&S for quick pictures, but such a product would make that irrelevant.

The maximum apertures are highly impressive at all focal lengths. I can't wait to see how this thing performs in low-light conditions--even zoomed out!!

With luck maybe the lx5's, tl500's or one of the ricoh auto lens caps will work with the XZ-1!


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Er1kksen
Member
175 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Fredonia, NY
     
Jan 24, 2011 20:19 |  #28

MOkoFOko wrote in post #11693066 (external link)
To me, the AF speed is extremely important. Saying it's as fast as the e-pens is nothing to brag about unfortunately :D When I had my e-p1, I was constantly groaning due to missed shots, thanks to the horrendously slow AF. Without a doubt, the AF on my s95 was much faster.

Keep in mind that the E-P1 was pretty darn slow compared to the newer generations. The question is whether they mean as fast as an E-P1 or an E-PL1 (a good bit faster), and if E-PL1, whether it's wearing an Oly lens or a Panasonic lens (again, faster).

Probably faster than most small-sensor compacts, at the least.


40D, 85mm f1.8, DC 952AF flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 25, 2011 21:02 |  #29

I'm really excited for this camera. I wish Canon would come out with something in this size with a hotshoe and f1.8.


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 25, 2011 21:12 |  #30

pxchoi wrote in post #11714638 (external link)
I'm really excited for this camera. I wish Canon would come out with something in this size with a hotshoe and f1.8.

It might be nice, but I can totally see why they didn't put a hotshoe on the s95. Can you see the diminutive s95 with an 580exII attached? :D

At least with Olympus lenses, you can stick on the itty-bitty FL-14 flash.


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,825 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
New S90/g12/lx5 killer from olympus
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1017 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.