What can I do to get a sharper pic. when I have to zoom in to get the shot. To clarify this is a great Blue Herron not a Bittern.
Lonestarlady61 Senior Member 696 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Montana for over 13 years but I'm originally from Houston, Texas. More info | Jan 07, 2011 00:46 | #1 What can I do to get a sharper pic. when I have to zoom in to get the shot. To clarify this is a great Blue Herron not a Bittern. Canon 60D since Dec. 2011, Canon 28-135mm lens, Canon 70-300mm USM lens and Nifty Fifty 50mm 1.8 lens. Just got in a new lens: Tamron 18-270mm ; )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroimage Goldmember 2,169 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jan 07, 2011 00:51 | #2 Are you sure that this is a bittern? It looks a lot like a great blue heron.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lonestarlady61 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 696 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Montana for over 13 years but I'm originally from Houston, Texas. More info | Jan 07, 2011 00:53 | #3 macroimage wrote in post #11589965 Are you sure that this is a bittern? It looks a lot like a great blue heron. That's what I thought too but a friend said no it's a Bittern. I should look it up. Canon 60D since Dec. 2011, Canon 28-135mm lens, Canon 70-300mm USM lens and Nifty Fifty 50mm 1.8 lens. Just got in a new lens: Tamron 18-270mm ; )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 07, 2011 02:07 | #4 Definitely not a Bittern. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 07, 2011 10:07 | #5 If you want to know why it's not sharp, you should provide some exif info, including what zoom lens you used, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroimage Goldmember 2,169 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jan 07, 2011 20:52 | #6 Actually the EXIF is in the image. It was a Sony DSC-H50 at 1/640s, f/5.6, ISO 100 with the lens at 78mm focal length. I don't know if digital zoom was used. If so, this will cost sharpness.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lonestarlady61 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 696 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Montana for over 13 years but I'm originally from Houston, Texas. More info | Jan 07, 2011 21:11 | #7 macroimage wrote in post #11595645 Actually the EXIF is in the image. It was a Sony DSC-H50 at 1/640s, f/5.6, ISO 100 with the lens at 78mm focal length. I don't know if digital zoom was used. If so, this will cost sharpness. It looks reasonably sharp for a point and shoot camera. It might be that the focus was on the branches or nest instead of the bird. Ideally the bird would be looking into the frame rather than out of it. You could also wait for better lighting (more from the side) to show more surface texture which gives the impression of sharpness. Also you can set the camera sharpness low to retain the real detail, then after resizing the image to the final dimension, apply sharpening in Photoshop. This should give a sharper looking picture. Thanks for the great feedback. I am now using a Canon Rebel T1i but don't have many photos shot from that camera. So I'm resorting to posting older pics so I can get some cc on my photos that turned out well enough to post. I am learning so much from this forum. I at least have learned about the rule of thirds, more about how to focus on my subject and how to use software to improve my photos. Still lots to learn on aperture, shutter speed etc... What I enjoy shooting the most is landscapes and macro shots. My next purchase will be a macro lens. Canon 60D since Dec. 2011, Canon 28-135mm lens, Canon 70-300mm USM lens and Nifty Fifty 50mm 1.8 lens. Just got in a new lens: Tamron 18-270mm ; )
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroimage Goldmember 2,169 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jan 07, 2011 21:49 | #8 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2908 guests, 177 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||