Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Jan 2011 (Friday) 16:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Noise Reduction

 
isophotostudio
Senior Member
Avatar
494 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Akron, OH
     
Jan 07, 2011 16:19 |  #1

This seemed like the best area for this discussion... one of the biggest arguements my partner and I have on photo processing is using noise reduction.

I hate taking a noisy photo, which loses sharpness anyway because of the noise, and applying noise reduction to it, cutting back even further on sharpness. To this point I'm also willing to lose detail in suits in order to keep noise down.

My partner hates seeing noise and will happily harass me until I turn the noise reduction all the way up. He also prefers to up the fill light and gain back suit detail, than apply noise reduction to the photo.

We don't print the photos ourselves very often, and the one time I presented the client the choice between the two they liked the smoother photo.

I would like to get a feel from those who print more frequently how much the noise and the subsequent reduction is noticeable when printed around an 8x10. Have clients seen both versions and which do the majority prefer.


This is my camera, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
Canon 5D Mark 2/Gripped, Canon 7D, Canon 40D, Canon 28-135 f/3.5, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 30 f/1.4, Sigma 150 f 2.8, Sigma 24-70 f2.8
Alien Bee 800 & 400, 2 Dynaphos DP-2497

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jan 08, 2011 06:26 |  #2

I've printed ISO 1600 (1D2) and ISO 3200 (1D3) shots, only using a bit of color NR in LR.

No objectionably noise whatsoever.

Expose well, pixel peep less, print more ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jan 08, 2011 07:20 |  #3

If you want to judge noise, view a display on the monitor that is close in size to the intended print. Doing some math, the 5D2 at full res is 3744x5616 pixels. If your monitor is 100 ppi (it is probably in the area of 96-100 ppi) a 100% zoom will be 37.44x56.16 inches and a 25% zoom will be 9.4x14 inches and so will be a good approximation of how an 8x10 (8x12) will look.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Jan 08, 2011 11:41 |  #4

You can setup Photoshop with the ppi of your monitor, Edit/Preferences/Unit and Rulers/Screen Resolution. My monitor is 96. Also set Print Resolution to what you use to resize/resample for Print. I use 360 because my lab wants 360. So, after I resize/resample for print I get a very good idea of what it will look like on print, in terms of noise and sharpness (even though it is not being viewed at 100%).

Then when using the Hand Tool just click on Print Size in the main wIndow or View/Print Size.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isophotostudio
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
494 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Akron, OH
     
Jan 08, 2011 12:37 |  #5

ah....much of that seems to have gone over my head but I'll fiddle with it and I'm sure I'll get the gist once I'm mucking in the preferences.

Thanks!


This is my camera, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
Canon 5D Mark 2/Gripped, Canon 7D, Canon 40D, Canon 28-135 f/3.5, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 30 f/1.4, Sigma 150 f 2.8, Sigma 24-70 f2.8
Alien Bee 800 & 400, 2 Dynaphos DP-2497

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isophotostudio
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
494 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Akron, OH
     
Jan 08, 2011 12:46 |  #6

tzalman wrote in post #11597549 (external link)
If you want to judge noise, view a display on the monitor that is close in size to the intended print. Doing some math, the 5D2 at full res is 3744x5616 pixels. If your monitor is 100 ppi (it is probably in the area of 96-100 ppi) a 100% zoom will be 37.44x56.16 inches and a 25% zoom will be 9.4x14 inches and so will be a good approximation of how an 8x10 (8x12) will look.

Looking at the 25% view is much nice than pixel peeping. I spend so much time fixing blemishes I'm just used to zooming into 300% for everything. Thanks.


This is my camera, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
Canon 5D Mark 2/Gripped, Canon 7D, Canon 40D, Canon 28-135 f/3.5, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 30 f/1.4, Sigma 150 f 2.8, Sigma 24-70 f2.8
Alien Bee 800 & 400, 2 Dynaphos DP-2497

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_GUI_
Senior Member
Avatar
353 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Madrid (Spain)
     
Jan 08, 2011 16:03 |  #7

tzalman wrote in post #11597549 (external link)
If you want to judge noise, view a display on the monitor that is close in size to the intended print. Doing some math, the 5D2 at full res is 3744x5616 pixels. If your monitor is 100 ppi (it is probably in the area of 96-100 ppi) a 100% zoom will be 37.44x56.16 inches and a 25% zoom will be 9.4x14 inches and so will be a good approximation of how an 8x10 (8x12) will look.

Careful! this is not right since zoom display on PS performs a nearest neighbour reescaling (for obvious speed reasons), and this kind of rescaling means preserving SNR. So you don't have to zoom 25% to estimate how noise will look like, you have to resize to 25% and display at 100% zoom. Zooming at 25% would look much noisier.

Regards


http://www.guillermolu​ijk.com (external link) to subscribe click here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jan 10, 2011 05:50 |  #8

I think this is true for PSCS3 and older, but not for PSCS4 and 5?


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,759 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Noise Reduction
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
576 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.