Thanks for all of the advice. I was already leaning towards the 5d but I also had my eye on the 7d but I have made my decision.....Mark II 5D
Courtney
Jan 07, 2011 21:39 | #16 Thanks for all of the advice. I was already leaning towards the 5d but I also had my eye on the 7d but I have made my decision.....Mark II 5D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pbelarge Goldmember 2,837 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Westchester County, NY More info | There is no doubt that a good camera can help the non-professional make better images. It also helps the professional, that is why they choose to purchase/use them. just a few of my thoughts...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sinjans Senior Member 659 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Newfoundland and Labrador More info | Jan 07, 2011 21:54 | #18 JoeyBaccala wrote in post #11595703 FF over crop any day of the week! Yuppers. 5D2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
10megapixel "I'm a little slow" 3,872 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Â…Â…Surrounded by Corn and Rednecks in Indiana More info | I personally have yet to see the "Magical" $800 or $900 dollar difference between the 7D and the 5D2. The hype built up here on POTN about FF being soooo much better is amusing to read most the time, but it's unfortunately costly to the vast majority of newcomers who could get more for their money with another option, 99% won't even be able to distinguish the IQ between the two
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mapleton Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: United States More info | Jan 07, 2011 23:18 | #20 Hands down, wait for the Mark III. Canon T1i w/ 18-55mm EFS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KVNPhoto Goldmember 1,940 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia More info | Jan 07, 2011 23:57 | #21 Mark II, but if you will buy both later, why don't start from 7D, since 5D II maybe upgrade to Mark III this year. X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
billposter Member 109 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: A Scot in Sherwood Forrest More info | Jan 08, 2011 00:05 | #22 10megapixel wrote in post #11596312 I personally have yet to see the "Magical" $800 or $900 dollar difference between the 7D and the 5D2. The hype built up here on POTN about FF being soooo much better is amusing to read most the time, but it's unfortunately costly to the vast majority of newcomers who could get more for their money with another option, 99% won't even be able to distinguish the IQ between the two If you have the cash and the smaller DOF that full frame offers is important to you in your style of photography then I say go for the 5D2, but if your on a budget, I would not be so quick to dismiss the 7D, I think you would be pleasantly suprised with what you get for the money.This "FF goodness" hype is like the emperors new clothes. Canon 7D, 24-105mm L f/4, 70-200mm F4 L IS, Canon 100mm F2, Sigma 12-24mm, nifty fifty, 580 EXII, Elinchrom D-Lites (2) Slik tripod and bags up the ying yang
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 08, 2011 00:15 | #23 I had the same questions when I got my 7D. Now I wish I would have gone with the 5Dm2. The high iso and IQ between crop and FF is now distinguishable to me now. Before, I looked at the specs on paper and decided on the 7D for all its features. The 7D is serving my needs fine though, so I am just waiting for the next FF camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sports_Dude Goldmember 1,112 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2008 Location: California More info | Jan 08, 2011 00:16 | #24 Based on your types of pictures, I would say go with the 5DMKII. If you were shooting sports, I'd say go with the 7D over the 5D. Sports_Dude
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johneo Goldmember 1,428 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: North Kingstown, RI More info | Jan 08, 2011 06:25 | #25 I've got both and prefer the 5DMKII ... not putting the 7D down by any means but I shoot a lot of what you mention you shoot and the 5D2 is my prefered camera for just about everything. 7D makes a great 2nd / backup camera! It does seem a lot of people have both, doesn't it? 2 - 5DMKII's, Powershot SX 150 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joebokeh Member 50 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Jan 08, 2011 06:38 | #26 10megapixel wrote in post #11596312 I personally have yet to see the "Magical" $800 or $900 dollar difference between the 7D and the 5D2. The hype built up here on POTN about FF being soooo much better is amusing to read most the time, but it's unfortunately costly to the vast majority of newcomers who could get more for their money with another option, 99% won't even be able to distinguish the IQ between the two If you have the cash and the smaller DOF that full frame offers is important to you in your style of photography then I say go for the 5D2, but if your on a budget, I would not be so quick to dismiss the 7D, I think you would be pleasantly suprised with what you get for the money.OP: Here are some posts you may want to check out. Good luck https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=8869601&postcount=18 https://photography-on-the.net …hlight=FF+VS.+Crop&page=2 word.... i had the 5dII and im on my 2nd 7D.. 5dII great camera, sold it... but for MOST people... you cant even tell if you expose correctly... the only thing i really miss about FF is the lens selection...soo many wides available to you... the only wide fast prime for a crop is the 28 f/1.8 which is normal fov... i jus want a 35mm FOV 1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LoneRider Goldmember 1,349 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Mount Isa, North West Qld More info | Jan 08, 2011 06:47 | #27 With the hundreds of posts that are on this subject the answer is out there. Trevor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeW Senior Member 619 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Alabama More info | Jan 08, 2011 07:30 | #28 5dII for me, but if you are shooting events professionally, two 50ds would be better than one 5dII. Only takes one failed camera to ruin an event. In the least, pick up something like an Rebel XS or a 2nd hand 30d to go in the bag in case of emergency. Gear: 5DII, 40D, 24-105 f4L, 100-400L; 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4 IS L, 17-40 f4 L, 50 f1.4, 550 EX (& a 10D w/ a broken shudder & an Elan IIe that still works)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fodowsky Senior Member 591 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Jan 08, 2011 08:00 | #29 I had both and sold the 7D. Nothing "magical" about the 5DII, it was just that the pictures were better overall than what I got from the 7D. It wasn't a one shot comparison but many shots over a period of time that made my decision. I found I was just using the 7D less and less.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DarthVader There is no such thing as Title Fairy ever 6,513 posts Likes: 42 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Death Star More info | Jan 08, 2011 08:31 | #30 I'm getting the one that can focus. Nikon/Fuji.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1012 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||