Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 09 Jan 2011 (Sunday) 09:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bogy the Dog

 
davidc502
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Jan 09, 2011 09:32 |  #1

This is Bogy, my fathers Dog.

His head turned to the side because of the extremly narrow focus area. If a picture was taken of his nose, the rest of his head would be out of focus. The exercise of this shot was to get as much bokeh as possible, thus the f1.4. I realize f1.4 is not the butter-zone of this lense, but once again, I was trying narrow DOF and lots of bokeh.

What is good about this photo and what is bad? Lay it on me.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corkneyfonz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,477 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Jan 09, 2011 13:17 |  #2

I would have preferred the illumination on his muzzle to be the same as that on the back of his head.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gibbit1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,658 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Valdese, nc
     
Jan 09, 2011 13:25 |  #3

Well, the bokeh is beautiful, so you achieved that goal. The problem is that the back of his head is in sunlight, and the front is in shadow. This gives you two different white balances, and at the opposite ends of the spectrum at that. The WB looks good on the back of his head, but his muzzle is too blue. Not much you can do without some serious (for me) processing work, but I'm sure someone here could fix it in about 20 seconds.


"Everything will be alright. I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Gear: EOS 5DMKII; EOS 400D (infrared converted); Canon 24-105mm f/4 L; Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX; Canon 70-200mm f/4 L; Canon 135mm f/2.0 L; Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 with EOS adaptor, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8; only enough knowledge to be a clear and present danger to society.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:37 |  #4

Great crits guys. This is exactly the type of comments I need as I'm beginning to learn some of the art.


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RhysPhotograph.Me
Senior Member
Avatar
504 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 03, 2012 13:28 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I would also say the image looks under exposed, also the bokeh is good but I would like to maybe see more of the dog as the crop is a bit tight for my taste.

The eyes are also too dark from being in shadow and could do will a boost of fill light in lightroom or similar. WB has already been mentioned as it's a little too cold. Accurate WB isn't also important to be accurate, for instance if you are capturing a warm moment, then it can often look better to use a warmer WB.
Also it's nice to see a catchlight in the eyes if possible, below is an example.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


As for DOF and getting the whole head in focus, imo that isn't necessary as the eyes are the hero in the shot, not the dog's wet nose and slobber on his chops.

Obviously there is nothing wrong with getting the whole dog in focus, but I would only do that if the background adds rather than takes away from the image.

Below is an example of just the eyes in focus.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

Wedding photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntingskeetman
Member
103 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Olmsted Falls,OH
     
Feb 07, 2012 21:14 |  #6

A little fill flash would have helped balance it out a bit. Also I would have shot it more face in than off to the side and have tried vertical crop as well. I realize dogs are hard to photograph and you only have brief moments sometimes before the move off or become uncooperative. Good effort, keep up the good work.


GARY

Canon 60D, 15-85IS, 60 macro, 100-400 IS, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnb007
Senior Member
352 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2011
Location: SoTx
     
Feb 08, 2012 09:14 |  #7

This is a very educational thread. It should be used in a textbook.


-John
Canon 5DIII I 70-200 2.8L I 24-70 2.8L I 100 2.8L macro
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,802 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Bogy the Dog
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1108 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.