Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 09 Jan 2011 (Sunday) 13:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Eye Contact or Candid ??

 
Dustman
Senior Member
Avatar
885 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Mar 2010
Location: New Jersey
     
Jan 09, 2011 13:51 |  #1

My wife wants to hang one of these pics on the wall in our house. I love the 1st shot with the great eye contact of the goat..........and our nephew. She prefers the 2nd photo of them starring & smiling at the goats.

What does everyone here think is a better shot??

Thanks, and all C&C is welcome. Thanks to everyone in advance, it is much appreciated


www.DustinLevine.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:05 |  #2

I like #2. The youngster is so absorbed with the goats and the goats are paying so much more attention to the people. The lady's amusement is delightful in that one, too. Finally, the person in the background (upper right corner) is much less noticeable in #2.


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corkneyfonz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,477 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:17 |  #3

Both are great shots but the second just wins it for me.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andydunlop
Member
123 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Scotland
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:17 as a reply to  @ Rimmer's post |  #4

Another vote for #2, much nicer overall - everything fits together much cleaner


Andy Dunlop: Events & Publicity Manager / Tour Manager / DJ
Website: www.andydunlop.co.uk (external link) / flickr.com/andunlop71 (external link)
Cameras: Canon 1000D / Canon 550D
Lenses: Canon 18-55mm kit / Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6/ Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 II / Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 / Canon 17-85mm IS USM f/4-5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:27 as a reply to  @ andydunlop's post |  #5

I love the eye contact from both species in #1 but I agree with the sentiments above regarding the moment. I'd print and hang #2.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:30 as a reply to  @ FlyingPhotog's post |  #6

#2, the focus is much sharper in this one, and the emotion is priceless


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregr2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,468 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Apr 2010
Location: West Melbourne, Fl
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:33 |  #7

#2 is great, I would try to clone out the arm of the woman in the background. The one coming out of your wife's head.


Flickr (external link)
Sony A6500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GooseberryVisuals
Goldmember
Avatar
1,045 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:35 |  #8

I like the 2nd one, but you have some major ghosting going on in both of them.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1shot4u
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Augusta, Ga
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:48 |  #9

#2 for my vote.


Stephen Shell
Canon G12.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bwerd
Member
36 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Seattle - City of rain
     
Jan 09, 2011 14:51 |  #10

#2 also for me!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroimage
Goldmember
2,169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jan 09, 2011 15:04 |  #11

Both are nice. The goat looking into the camera is great but the second picture shows more of the interaction between the people and the goats which was probably closer to the intended story.

In both cases the arm in the background takes away from it. With a bit of effort, you could replace it with some more sky and fence. Being out of focus makes it easier.

Also maybe only apply sharpening to the in focus parts of the picture, and before applying the black background. Doing it after has left a row of bright pixels around the edge that draw the eye to the edge instead of the center. Sharpening the out of focus areas enhances bokeh problems. One quick method is after global sharpening, just take the history brush, set the history marker just before the sharpen step, then "wipe" it away where it isn't needed. You can also it with layer masks if you prefer. Then the background will be softer edged and the main subject will pop even more.


Photo Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hoiber
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Jan 09, 2011 16:25 |  #12

no. 2 for me very nice shot. both subjects seem absorbed by the amimals and improves the image greatly


Canon 7D - Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L IS USM Macro - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM - Canon EF-S 15-85mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM [Smugmug (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tobiasfrost
Member
Avatar
72 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
     
Jan 09, 2011 16:43 |  #13

I think I prefer the first one.

I don't find the people in the background so distracting, I didn't really notice them even until I started reading the comments.

The one thing I would say about the second is I find the orange band on her wrist distracting. I'm sure you both know what the band is so it might have meaning to you that makes it fit in more, but to someone like me I have no idea what it is from.


dA (external link) - Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Randi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,106 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO.
     
Jan 09, 2011 17:04 |  #14

#2, because more interaction with the people/goats, and your wife's expression.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EvenBid50
Member
57 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Chicago,IL
     
Jan 09, 2011 17:48 |  #15

#2 here




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,400 views & 0 likes for this thread, 29 members have posted to it.
Eye Contact or Candid ??
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2638 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.