website domain name question.

TGrundvig wrote in post #11611200
+1 for tamphoto.com

It is simple and easy to remember.

The only problem with this is someone with an established photography business owns tamphotos.com. You might end up sending business their way, but you may also leach some of theirs. could be confusing, maybe not though.

Rich Brown Photography wrote in post #11612580
The only problem with this is someone with an established photography business owns tamphotos.com. You might end up sending business their way, but you may also leach some of theirs. could be confusing, maybe not though.

I never said it was available, I just said I agreed with the simplicity.

TGrundvig wrote in post #11613220
I never said it was available, I just said I agreed with the simplicity.

I wasn't arguing with you. Tamphoto.com is simple and has a good ring. Was just adding that the name is available to register but it is very similar to the established site tamphotos.com. just another thing for the op to consider before selecting a domain.

Rich Brown Photography wrote in post #11614732
I wasn't arguing with you. Tamphoto.com is simple and has a good ring. Was just adding that the name is available to register but it is very similar to the established site tamphotos.com. just another thing for the op to consider before selecting a domain.

Sorry if I came across the wrong way, I did not think you were arguing with me.

Yeah, those two names are so close that it might drive get some customers confused. I think I like the sound of tamphoto better than tamphotos. Kinda has a nice and simple sound to it. Also, I think people searching online 'might' be more likely to forget the 's' at the end and drive more people to the OPs site.