Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Jan 2011 (Monday) 19:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Hahnemuhle photo rag color prints

 
Qbx
Goldmember
3,984 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 10, 2011 19:19 |  #1

I have an Epson R2400 and made a color print on Hahnemuhle photo rag Satin paper. Shadow areas show banding. I used Best Photo & Archival Matte Paper settings in the printer properties. I used Photoshop manages colors, HFA_Eps2400_MK_PhotoRa​g printer profile and Relative Colorimetric. I am using MK black ink.

If I print with Pearl paper, PK ink and profile the print looks fine.

Computer is Thinkpad W700 laptop with Spyder calibration.

Is Photo-Rag Satin suitable for color prints or just B&W? Or could the profile be bad? Any help would be appreciated.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
Jan 10, 2011 19:42 |  #2

I use Photo Rag Bright White 310gsm for large color prints all the time on Canon's IPF5000. Spot on with no banding in any areas with the profile on Hahnemuhle's site. Check to see if you're also banding in large single tone gradients such as blue sky as it may help narrow down the issue. Hope this helps.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 11, 2011 06:16 as a reply to  @ R Hardman's post |  #3

Yes, HFA is great for color. Not familiar with the 2400 driver, but isn't HFA supposed to be set at Velvet Fine Art Matte and not Archival Matte?

What is the native resolution of the image and what size are you printing to? Also, are you printing at the native resolution of the printer? Again, been years since using a 2400 but if I recall, it's 360. I prefer to have PS translate the file as opposed to the epson driver.

The 2400 and the original 3800 are very similar in the way they print, the drivers, etc. You might find some help on Eric Chan's epson 3800 pages.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,984 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 11, 2011 19:11 as a reply to  @ Picture North Carolina's post |  #4

Thanks R Hardman & N. Carolina for the inputs. I usually shoot with a Canon 5D II but I was testing a new Lumix GH2 at max resolution of 16 mp. The print resolution shows as 352 PPI at a 51% scale about a 10x13 inch print. I don't know how to answer the question about printing to the printer's native resolution. I'm just following the standard printing menus through Photoshop. I tried a lot of different combinations of profiles etc. I found that the best result is obtained using an Epson profile (SPR2400 EnhancedMatte). Using Printer Manages Colors also eliminated the banding; but had an unpleasant color shift so it wasn't useful.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 11, 2011 19:46 |  #5

Qbx wrote in post #11620824 (external link)
TI'm just following the standard printing menus through Photoshop. I tried a lot of different combinations of profiles etc.

When printing to any good quality paper, it is always best to go to the support website of that paper, download (and use) their profiles, and follow the paper manufacturer's instructions for printing with your specific paper/printer combination.

http://www.hahnemuehle​.com/site/us/468/icc-profiles.html (external link)

Also, I hate to mention the obvious, but did you clean and test the nozzles?


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,984 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jan 21, 2011 18:40 |  #6

Picture North Carolina wrote in post #11621037 (external link)
When printing to any good quality paper, it is always best to go to the support website of that paper, download (and use) their profiles, and follow the paper manufacturer's instructions for printing with your specific paper/printer combination.

http://www.hahnemuehle​.com/site/us/468/icc-profiles.html (external link)

Also, I hate to mention the obvious, but did you clean and test the nozzles?

Thanks Dan, Yes I did to a nozzle check and all was OK. As mentioned just using a different profile (or Printer manages colors) resolved the banding problem. It seems like a problem with the Hahnemuhle R2400 (downloaded from their site) profile to me.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,276 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Hahnemuhle photo rag color prints
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2720 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.