bzollinger wrote in post #11642360
Wow these are great!! I found this thread because I'm going to make a second attempt at a match photo tomorrow. My first attempt went well in some respects and not in others. Trying to get good captures of the smoke is something I really want to work on.
So by using the cardboad, you effectively made a snoot? That's funny I just got my lumiquest softbox and thought that making the flash cover more area would be good! It looks like your results speak for themselves.
Maybe I'll put the 580EX II into manual zoom mode and crank it up to 100mm. Do you think that'll work? Do you have any suggestions for me?
thanks for sharing your awesome photos, there are some very mystical qualities about them.
Thank you. 
Yeah, the cardboard was pretty much a DIY snoot. I just bent the cardboard to match the head of my flash and saran wrapped the hell out of it.
As far as using a softbox, I don't think it's necessary. When I took these photos, at most I was covering about 1 foot of smoke, which I think is more than necessary. I don't know about any other types of smoke but I feel there are 3 parts to smoke. 1 is the thin line that forms at the smoke source, then about a foot above is where the smoke starts to get very intricate. Another 1/2 above is where the smoke dissipates in to just puffy smoke.
So using a softbox to cover about 1 foot of smoke probably would hurt more than it helps because then you're flooding light to the background, etc. At first, I used the snoot because I didn't want to flood the room and background with light. When I started snapping photos, I felt the snoot made the smoke a bit more intense. It really brings out the white or black (if you go negative). Also, my flash wasn't in a fixed position on every shot. I had it constantly shifting because I had no extra tripod. Some of the pics I took, the flash was actually on the photo and others were far away.
I didn't try putting the flash to 100mm but it's worth a shot, right? Let me know how that goes.