Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 11 Jan 2011 (Tuesday) 01:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First try at smoke photos

 
Intolight23
Senior Member
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jan 11, 2011 01:04 |  #1

So I finally got my 580ex ii and I decided to take a shot at smoke again. First time I did it, it wasn't that great but I read a guide some where on this site. I wish I could credit him but I forget where it was.

Pretty much this was done with 3 layers of black fabric pinned up to a wall that draped down to my coffee table. The camera had a really difficult time auto focusing so I used some scissors and had it focus to where my smoke would be coming up from. I made a, funnel(?) with some cardboard and saran wrap (I was all out of tape) and placed it over my flash so it wouldn't flood the room. I used a pizza box as a bounce board (this is REAAALLY DIY).

ISO 800
50mm
f/3.5
1/60 shutter
Flash set to manual 1/32

Held the flash to the right of the smoke, aimed it at the smoke and pizza box and this is what I got.

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y52/sk8gitar23/Playing%20with%20Smoke/IMG_1033.jpg

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y52/sk8gitar23/Playing%20with%20Smoke/IMG_1027.jpg

When I was editing these I noticed a lot of the condensed smoke accidentally cut off at the top but overall. I should've aimed a bit higher I think.

My Flickr (external link) || My Project 365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jan 11, 2011 01:09 |  #2

Very nice! Just out of curiosity, why shoot at ISO 800?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intolight23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jan 11, 2011 01:15 |  #3

bsaber wrote in post #11615678 (external link)
Very nice! Just out of curiosity, why shoot at ISO 800?

Thanks!

Honestly? I was trying to get my scissors in focus but the AF was being stupid cause I couldn't get any light to meter it. I cranked up my ISO and forgot to put it back down. :(


My Flickr (external link) || My Project 365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jan 11, 2011 01:39 |  #4

Intolight23 wrote in post #11615696 (external link)
Thanks!

Honestly? I was trying to get my scissors in focus but the AF was being stupid cause I couldn't get any light to meter it. I cranked up my ISO and forgot to put it back down. :(

Ah, made me wonder :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emmalish
Senior Member
Avatar
353 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
     
Jan 11, 2011 01:47 |  #5

Intolight23 wrote in post #11615696 (external link)
Thanks!

Honestly? I was trying to get my scissors in focus but the AF was being stupid cause I couldn't get any light to meter it. I cranked up my ISO and forgot to put it back down. :(

Heh, I've done that (d'oh!). Nice shots – I love how it looks in negative. What did you use for the source of the smoke? Cigarette? Blown out candle? Incense?


50D
24-85 | MP-E 65 | 60 Macro | 100 Macro | 70-200L f/4 IS | Tamron 90 Macro
420EX | 580EX | MT-24EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intolight23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jan 11, 2011 02:17 |  #6

emmalish wrote in post #11615818 (external link)
Heh, I've done that (d'oh!). Nice shots – I love how it looks in negative. What did you use for the source of the smoke? Cigarette? Blown out candle? Incense?

Thanks. I used a cigarette. I really wanted to try incense because they give a narrower smoke and you can manipulate it a bit more. It also smells a lot nicer. :)


My Flickr (external link) || My Project 365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssmanak
Senior Member
439 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Chandigarh, India
     
Jan 11, 2011 07:10 |  #7

Beautiful. In the upper picture I see a ghost figure with eyes & two hands. Lower figure is wearing ladies high heel shoe. Lot of imagination is possible here. Lower picture is compositionally cut off abruptly on top.

What camera & lens is used. I assume off camera flash was fired using PC wire.


ss.manak
EOS 6D ii, Canon 24-105f4 L ii, Canon 50 f1.4, Tamron 100-400 f4.5-6.3 VC, Canon 430EX ii, Canon 270 exii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corkneyfonz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,477 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Jan 11, 2011 17:29 |  #8

I really like the first one, very nice. The second just seems a little too jumbled and may benefit from some overpainting to calm it down.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intolight23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jan 12, 2011 01:12 |  #9

The first thing I noticed when I was editing these photos was that I felt like I was taking those ink blot tests. I think that's what originally attracted me to these types of photos, it's like looking at clouds and finding outlines of random things.

Camera I used was Rebel T2i
50mm f/1.4 USM
Pixel Flash Sync Cord for 580EX ii

@ crokney - I'll try and cut off the top of the 2nd one and see if it looks cleaner.


My Flickr (external link) || My Project 365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intolight23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jan 12, 2011 01:19 |  #10

I just cropped the top part and fixed it up a bit and it makes a huge difference! It actually looks like a woman at the bottom and a person with wings yelling at the top.

Thanks for the advice!

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y52/sk8gitar23/IMG_1027.jpg

My Flickr (external link) || My Project 365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssmanak
Senior Member
439 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Chandigarh, India
     
Jan 12, 2011 03:19 |  #11

Great. Lady with wings.

I just sold my 50f1.4 to fund 24-70. Looking at these pics, I hope I made a good decision.


ss.manak
EOS 6D ii, Canon 24-105f4 L ii, Canon 50 f1.4, Tamron 100-400 f4.5-6.3 VC, Canon 430EX ii, Canon 270 exii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imgnxpsr
Member
Avatar
38 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 12, 2011 06:31 |  #12

If you boost your shutter speed you can point a low power continuous light at the smoke so you can focus easier.


Cameras don't take good pictures, photographers take good pictures
ImaginExposure (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intolight23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jan 12, 2011 12:48 |  #13

ssmanak wrote in post #11622962 (external link)
Great. Lady with wings.

I just sold my 50f1.4 to fund 24-70. Looking at these pics, I hope I made a good decision.

It's all preferences I feel. Personally, I like having that 1 lens I can rely on. 50mm seems versatile for most of the things I needed.

imgnxpsr wrote in post #11623358 (external link)
If you boost your shutter speed you can point a low power continuous light at the smoke so you can focus easier.

I tried using a book light to light the smoke while I tried to focus but I didn't have my shutter speed high. I'll try that next time. Thanks.


My Flickr (external link) || My Project 365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bzollinger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,257 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2009
Location: The Great White North!
     
Jan 14, 2011 18:01 |  #14

Wow these are great!! I found this thread because I'm going to make a second attempt at a match photo tomorrow. My first attempt went well in some respects and not in others. Trying to get good captures of the smoke is something I really want to work on.

So by using the cardboad, you effectively made a snoot? That's funny I just got my lumiquest softbox and thought that making the flash cover more area would be good! It looks like your results speak for themselves.

Maybe I'll put the 580EX II into manual zoom mode and crank it up to 100mm. Do you think that'll work? Do you have any suggestions for me?

thanks for sharing your awesome photos, there are some very mystical qualities about them.


5DMKIII | EOS M | 14mm f/2.8 Rokinon | 15mm f/2.8 fisheye | 16-35mm f/4 L | 24-105mm L | 50mm f/1.4 USM | 100mm Macro f/2.8 L IS | 580ex II | Benro C2980F Veratile legs w/ Manfrotto 468MGRC2 Head | www.alaskanphotographs​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intolight23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
295 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jan 14, 2011 21:19 |  #15

bzollinger wrote in post #11642360 (external link)
Wow these are great!! I found this thread because I'm going to make a second attempt at a match photo tomorrow. My first attempt went well in some respects and not in others. Trying to get good captures of the smoke is something I really want to work on.

So by using the cardboad, you effectively made a snoot? That's funny I just got my lumiquest softbox and thought that making the flash cover more area would be good! It looks like your results speak for themselves.

Maybe I'll put the 580EX II into manual zoom mode and crank it up to 100mm. Do you think that'll work? Do you have any suggestions for me?

thanks for sharing your awesome photos, there are some very mystical qualities about them.

Thank you. :)

Yeah, the cardboard was pretty much a DIY snoot. I just bent the cardboard to match the head of my flash and saran wrapped the hell out of it.

As far as using a softbox, I don't think it's necessary. When I took these photos, at most I was covering about 1 foot of smoke, which I think is more than necessary. I don't know about any other types of smoke but I feel there are 3 parts to smoke. 1 is the thin line that forms at the smoke source, then about a foot above is where the smoke starts to get very intricate. Another 1/2 above is where the smoke dissipates in to just puffy smoke.

So using a softbox to cover about 1 foot of smoke probably would hurt more than it helps because then you're flooding light to the background, etc. At first, I used the snoot because I didn't want to flood the room and background with light. When I started snapping photos, I felt the snoot made the smoke a bit more intense. It really brings out the white or black (if you go negative). Also, my flash wasn't in a fixed position on every shot. I had it constantly shifting because I had no extra tripod. Some of the pics I took, the flash was actually on the photo and others were far away.

I didn't try putting the flash to 100mm but it's worth a shot, right? Let me know how that goes.


My Flickr (external link) || My Project 365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,996 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
First try at smoke photos
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2598 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.