What lens do you think they were using?
http://www.wimp.com/gigapixelphoto/
Jan 11, 2011 07:44 | #1 What lens do you think they were using? Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 11, 2011 07:57 | #2 I'll go for over 400mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 11, 2011 10:10 | #3 I had no idea anyone was making photos that big. I wonder how long that took to process. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Its crazy, I first seen one of Dresden which claimed to be the largest as of December 2009 The picture was made with the Canon 5D mark II and a 400mm-lens. It consists of 1.665 full format pictures with 21.4 megapixel, which was recorded by a photo-robot in 172 minutes. The converting of 102 GB raw data by a computer with a main memory cache of 48 GB and 16 processors took 94 hours. With a resolution of 297.500 x 87.500 pixel (26 gigapixel) the picture is the largest in the world. (stand December 2009) That one from the first link i posted smashes that now.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ni$mo350 Cream of the Crop  6,011 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Portland, OR More info | Jan 11, 2011 14:13 | #5 |
KRUSTYTHECLOWN Member 50 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mtnbkr1 Senior Member 257 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Los Angeles More info | Jan 11, 2011 14:37 | #7 psh gigapixels are old. how bout 5.5 TERAPIXELS! http://cdn5.mattters.com …apixel_featured_thumb.jpg 5Dc | 85L | 1200 f5.6L | Lighting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 11, 2011 14:50 | #8 mtnbkr1 wrote in post #11619123 psh gigapixels are old. how bout 5.5 TERAPIXELS! http://cdn5.mattters.com …apixel_featured_thumb.jpg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
muskyhunter Goldmember  1,137 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Jan 11, 2011 14:52 | #9 LOL!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 11, 2011 15:02 | #10 mtnbkr1 wrote in post #11619123 psh gigapixels are old. how bout 5.5 TERAPIXELS! http://cdn5.mattters.com …apixel_featured_thumb.jpg I gotta get me one of those! Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ment0r Hatchling 1 post Joined Nov 2010 More info | Jan 12, 2011 00:38 | #11 Does anyone know how one would go about to make one of these things? I'm guessing a special tripod is required that would automate the picture taking, and that you'd require multiple days to take the images during the right lighting conditions. Would I be wrong?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 12, 2011 01:21 | #12 I doubt my HD is large enough to hold even one of these pictures. Christopher J. Martin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
buurin Senior Member  747 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Jan 12, 2011 02:08 | #13 Ment0r wrote in post #11622541 Does anyone know how one would go about to make one of these things? I'm guessing a special tripod is required that would automate the picture taking, and that you'd require multiple days to take the images during the right lighting conditions. Would I be wrong? B
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1060 guests, 101 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
