How did you get it to pose like that?
Is there an agency you use?
mtimber Cream of the Crop  5,011 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Cambs, UK More info | Oct 18, 2011 06:35 | #2416 How did you get it to pose like that? "I don't like the direction this thread is going..." (LightRules)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
.mark. Goldmember  1,038 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Jersey, Channel Islands More info | Oct 18, 2011 06:47 | #2417 Rivest wrote in post #13266381  Love it Mark! Thanks 5DIII :: 15FE :: 16-35LII :: 24LII :: 50L :: 85 1.8 :: 135L :: 100-400L :: 430EX2 :: 580EX2 :: YN560II x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chrisa Goldmember More info | Oct 18, 2011 08:19 | #2418 Yes, Mantis model mayhem. 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chrisa Goldmember More info | Oct 18, 2011 08:21 | #2419 Crazy_Guitar wrote in post #13266231 Awsome! Really awsome! How did you get the black backdrop? Is that an EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro? Yes, Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro plus a full set of kenko tubes. If you use high speed flash sync(1/250th) the backgrounds are usually dark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times  More info | Oct 18, 2011 10:09 | #2420 chrisa wrote in post #13266860 Yes, Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro plus a full set of kenko tubes. If you use high speed flash sync(1/250th) the backgrounds are usually dark. Do you own the 100L macro or the standard 100 macro lens? Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dabert07 Goldmember  1,596 posts Likes: 247 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Oct 18, 2011 10:21 | #2421 Here is a pic that shows the flash setup  Flash setup 1 by dabert2011, on Flickrand the result  Jason David Frank at UFC 2 (1 of 1) by dabert2011, on FlickrOne more BTS set up pic  BTS set up pic by dabert2011, on Flickrand the result  Anderson Silva, Sky scrape, Bruce Buffer by dabert2011, on FlickrCanon 5D 2, 450D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
It was a pain in the butt trying to get the exposures for this without people in the shot.   Kevin: 5D Mark III, Canon 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Copidosoma Goldmember More info | Oct 18, 2011 11:07 | #2423 Bioshock wrote in post #13267499 It was a pain in the butt trying to get the exposures for this without people in the shot.  Very nice. Did you remove the people with multiple images and photoshop or did you have to wait for the "magic moment"? Gear: 7DII | 6D | Fuji X100s |Sigma 24A, 50A, 150-600C |24-105L |Samyang 14 2.8|Tamron 90mm f2.8 |and some other stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 18, 2011 12:27 | #2424 Copidosoma wrote in post #13267634 Very nice. Did you remove the people with multiple images and photoshop or did you have to wait for the "magic moment"? No people removing. Just kept trying since they seemed to come in waves. The 20 sec exposure always seemed to have someone come out the doors right at the end which caused ghosting and I didn't want to have to do the processing work to fix it. Kevin: 5D Mark III, Canon 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chrisa Goldmember More info | Oct 18, 2011 15:49 | #2425 Inspeqtor wrote in post #13267340 Do you own the 100L macro or the standard 100 macro lens? It's the original 100mm f/2.8 macro. Not the L lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yeow_Z Goldmember  1,198 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Orange County More info | Oct 19, 2011 00:06 | #2426 heres mine. sorry for the setup pic.
result;  jumping spider IMG_4361 by NICRU, on Flickr housefly IMG_4410 by NICRU, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inspeqtor I was hit more than 15 times More info | Oct 19, 2011 02:01 | #2427 chrisa wrote in post #13269247 It's the original 100mm f/2.8 macro. Not the L lens. Thank you. I am impressed with the tack sharp picture you got with it. I am now considering getting that lens! Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 19, 2011 06:39 | #2428 Inspeqtor wrote in post #13272098 Thank you. I am impressed with the tack sharp picture you got with it. I am now considering getting that lens! Just have to save my nickels and penneys!!! Doesn't have to be an L to be sharp! •••••••
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hinson Goldmember  More info | Oct 19, 2011 07:41 | #2429 So true; I love my 100 2.8 and my 50mm 1.4. Both are tack sharp and neither is an L lens. I think both would compare favorably with my (ex) 70-200 and 17-40, both of which were L lens. Artist tools: Lumix FZ1000 (Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC ALL NOW FOR SALE - REASONABLE OFFER)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crazy_Guitar Senior Member  616 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Braga, PT More info | Oct 19, 2011 08:26 | #2430 Well... you're comparing zooms to primes. 50D | 1000D | 30V | 17-40L | 18-55 USM | 24-105L | 28 2.8 | 50 1.8 II | 70-300 IS | 580EX II | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1504 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
