Were you talking to me? If so, then yeah it's a pocket wizard
Just an FYI if you reply to the post or make some reference to the post you're talking about it helps Haha
DThriller Goldmember More info | Nov 05, 2015 23:01 | #9211 Were you talking to me? If so, then yeah it's a pocket wizard http://www.facebook.com/DPhillipsStudios
LOG IN TO REPLY |
maxblack I feel like I'm in danger 2,051 posts Likes: 320 Joined Sep 2008 Location: NYC Area More info | Nov 05, 2015 23:04 | #9212 There is a link to your image on the upper right side of his post.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DThriller Goldmember More info | Nov 05, 2015 23:12 | #9213 Oooohh I see http://www.facebook.com/DPhillipsStudios
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 06, 2015 07:25 | #9214 DThriller wrote in post #17762091 Im not sure if this is how I'm going to keep the PP but I wanted to post this. Maybe get some c and c Thanks Model: Cara Hosted photo: posted by DThriller in ./showthread.php?p=17762091&i=i189956128 forum: Flash and Studio Lighting Hosted photo: posted by DThriller in ./showthread.php?p=17762091&i=i208204051 forum: Flash and Studio Lighting He was replying to this one. I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
idsurfer Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 06, 2015 07:28 | #9215 maxblack wrote in post #17773951 There is a link to your image on the upper right side of his post. That was the only way I could figure out what he was referencing. ![]() I don't like this newer way of replying to posts. I don't like having to click a link to understand what someone is referring to in their reply. I preferred when people simply quoted a post and replied underneath...like I have done. The other way seems cumbersome and I tend to just blow past those posts. It's unfortunate cause a lot of times I like to know what people are talking about or which shot they are commenting on. I just thought I'd share my opinion. Cory
LOG IN TO REPLY |
troehr Goldmember 1,061 posts Likes: 482 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand More info | Nov 06, 2015 09:49 | #9216 idsurfer wrote in post #17774152 I don't like this newer way of replying to posts. I don't like having to click a link to understand what someone is referring to in their reply. I preferred when people simply quoted a post and replied underneath...like I have done. The other way seems cumbersome and I tend to just blow past those posts. It's unfortunate cause a lot of times I like to know what people are talking about or which shot they are commenting on. I just thought I'd share my opinion.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LevinadeRuijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! 22,949 posts Gallery: 457 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 15518 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Nov 06, 2015 09:50 | #9217 idsurfer wrote in post #17774152 I don't like this newer way of replying to posts. I don't like having to click a link to understand what someone is referring to in their reply. I preferred when people simply quoted a post and replied underneath...like I have done. The other way seems cumbersome and I tend to just blow past those posts. It's unfortunate cause a lot of times I like to know what people are talking about or which shot they are commenting on. I just thought I'd share my opinion. I don't think it's fair to blame the software when in fact it's people not quoting properly. Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LittlejonDsgn Goldmember 3,266 posts Likes: 905 Joined Feb 2012 Location: Sandy, Oregon More info | Nov 06, 2015 09:57 | #9218 I think in a thread like this its helpful to quote the image you are commenting about. In threads where the OP is the only one who has posted images and is looking for comments its much nicer to not have everyone quoting the original post.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 06, 2015 11:05 | #9219 idsurfer wrote in post #17774152 I don't like this newer way of replying to posts. I don't like having to click a link to understand what someone is referring to in their reply. I preferred when people simply quoted a post and replied underneath...like I have done. The other way seems cumbersome and I tend to just blow past those posts. It's unfortunate cause a lot of times I like to know what people are talking about or which shot they are commenting on. I just thought I'd share my opinion. And unless I'm missing something, on my mobile device (iPhone) it doesn't display that little post number reference in the upper right corner of the reply. It only shows it on my desktop browser version making it even more confusing. If anyone knows a way to display the reference post # on mobile devices please share! InstaGram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
travisvwright Goldmember More info Post edited over 7 years ago by travisvwright. | Nov 06, 2015 11:26 | #9220 Mesmer wrote in post #17774360 And unless I'm missing something, on my mobile device (iPhone) it doesn't display that little post number reference in the upper right corner of the reply. It only shows it on my desktop browser version making it even more confusing. If anyone knows a way to display the reference post # on mobile devices please share! On any screen smaller than 570px it is hidden. I don't know if chrome extensions work on the iphone but with Stylebot you could easily set .reply_to_info{display: block;} I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Strick Senior Member More info | Nov 06, 2015 11:36 | #9221 If threads as helpful as this one didn't get cluttered up by discussions about the usefulness of the forum software it would not be as hard to know what someone was tallking about.......just sayin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SamFrench Senior Member 876 posts Likes: 66 Joined Jul 2011 Location: High in the Mountains More info | Nov 06, 2015 12:05 | #9222 Strick wrote in post #17774396 If threads as helpful as this one didn't get cluttered up by discussions about the usefulness of the forum software it would not be as hard to know what someone was tallking about.......just sayin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 06, 2015 13:15 | #9223 troehr wrote in post #17774286 I prefer this way also. Otherwise it is too confusing. This is especially true when people are commenting on different photos and the follow each other with no reference. I also agree with this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
idsurfer Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 06, 2015 20:58 | #9224 Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #17774287 I don't think it's fair to blame the software when in fact it's people not quoting properly. I'm not "blaming" anything, i.e. software. Just voicing my thoughts/opinion. I don't like having to click a link in order to figure out what a poster is replying to or talking about. For me I find it confusing and cumbersome. I prefer to keep internet surfing as efficient as posiblle. Every second counts. Sorry. Cory
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DThriller Goldmember More info | Nov 06, 2015 21:27 | #9225 DThriller wrote in post #17745264 I was inspired by some of you guys on here and want to try the colored gel studio look. I have a model lined up that wants to come and be my subject. These images are from my test shoot so I would appreciate some c and c so I can have the best possible shoot with the model. Thanks 3 speed lights 1 silver umbrella Hosted photo: posted by DThriller in ./showthread.php?p=17745264&i=i128188984 forum: Flash and Studio Lighting Hosted photo: posted by DThriller in ./showthread.php?p=17745264&i=i178875989 forum: Flash and Studio Lighting ^^^^^ Image hosted by forum (757962) © DThriller [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. http://www.facebook.com/DPhillipsStudios
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 877 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||