Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 11 Jan 2011 (Tuesday) 14:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Show us your setup and the final result!

 
Osa713
Goldmember
Avatar
1,537 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1227
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
     
Feb 11, 2018 22:20 |  #11041

Glow 51inch deep umbrella with an xplor 600

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/2/LQ_899601.jpg
Image hosted by forum (899601) © Osa713 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/02/2/LQ_899602.jpg
Image hosted by forum (899602) © Osa713 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

LIGHT>LENS>BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ray ­ Marrero
Goldmember
Avatar
1,770 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Jul 2005
Location: New Jersey
     
Feb 12, 2018 09:44 |  #11042

Nice, but I would raise the light about a foot.


Ray
Canon 6D, 7D, 30D, Flashpoint Zoom Li-on R2 x2, Flashpoint eVOLV 200 and XPlor 600, AB800 x3, Canon 10-22mm, 18-55mm, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, 24-70mm 2.8L, 24-105mm 4.0L, 70-200mm 2.8L IS, Sigma 28-105mm 2.8, Tamron 28-75mm 2.8, CyberSyncs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Osa713
Goldmember
Avatar
1,537 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1227
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
     
Feb 12, 2018 22:36 |  #11043

Ray Marrero wrote in post #18562021 (external link)
Nice, but I would raise the light about a foot.

Thanks, I wanted a little moody lighting on her face hence the positioning...


LIGHT>LENS>BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,359 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Feb 13, 2018 02:18 |  #11044

Osa713 wrote in post #18562498 (external link)
Thanks, I wanted a little moody lighting on her face hence the positioning...

Understand where you are coming from, but now it is too bright on the central part of the body.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Osa713
Goldmember
Avatar
1,537 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1227
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
     
Feb 13, 2018 05:45 |  #11045

vk2gwk wrote in post #18562571 (external link)
Understand where you are coming from, but now it is too bright on the central part of the body.

Thanks but I didn’t post the setup for feedback/critique, it looks good to me and I achieved my goal. ;-)a


LIGHT>LENS>BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agedbriar
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Likes: 398
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Slovenia
     
Feb 13, 2018 07:20 |  #11046

So, is it all in the eye of the beholder, or not? :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Osa713
Goldmember
Avatar
1,537 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1227
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Post edited over 5 years ago by Osa713.
     
Feb 13, 2018 09:18 |  #11047

agedbriar wrote in post #18562652 (external link)
So, is it all in the eye of the beholder, or not? :lol:

Lol. I don’t mean to come off rude and everyone is entitled to their own opinion so it’s all good.


LIGHT>LENS>BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idsurfer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,255 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4378
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Boise, Idaho
     
Feb 13, 2018 13:42 |  #11048

I tend to agree that if a person is not asking for feedback than it's best to say nothing. Most threads are just for sharing.


Cory
Sony ⍺6700 | Sony 10-20/4 | Sigma 56/1.4 | Tamron 17-70/2.8
flickr (external link)
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImageMaker...
looks like I picked a bad week to give up halucinagens
Avatar
2,187 posts
Gallery: 214 photos
Likes: 6778
Joined Dec 2015
Location: AZ-USA
     
Feb 13, 2018 13:44 |  #11049

idsurfer wrote in post #18562932 (external link)
I tend to agree that if a person is not asking for feedback than it's best to say nothing. Most threads are just for sharing.

Was wondering why folks here are so nice... :-)


Nikons, Rolleiflexes, Elinchroms, Broncolor Paras, Billinghams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
Avatar
1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria
Post edited over 5 years ago by DaviSto.
     
Feb 13, 2018 14:01 |  #11050

idsurfer wrote in post #18562932 (external link)
I tend to agree that if a person is not asking for feedback than it's best to say nothing. Most threads are just for sharing.

That's true ... but a thread set up on the basic premise that you show both the shot and how it was set up absolutely cries out for comment and discussion. Otherwise ... what's the point of it?

I think, if you submit to this thread, you should expect comment ... constructively and politely given, of course, but not necessarily universally positive.

If a posting is in "JUST KIDS 20##... Let's see them grow and learn", it's a different matter. Unless you have something nice to say about an image of someone's son or granddaughter, perhaps just keep it to yourself!


David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Feb 13, 2018 14:08 |  #11051

DaviSto wrote in post #18562939 (external link)
If a posting is in "JUST KIDS 20##... Let's see them grow and learn", it's a different matter. Unless you have something nice to say about an image of someone's son or granddaughter, perhaps just keep it to yourself!

OTOH, if you're willing to accept a "Great shot!" comment, you should also be willing to accept a, "You cut her ear in half!" comment, no?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
Avatar
1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 912
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria
Post edited over 5 years ago by DaviSto. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 13, 2018 14:13 |  #11052

PhotosGuy wrote in post #18562947 (external link)
OTOH, if you're willing to accept a "Great shot!" comment, you should also be willing to accept a, "You cut her ear in half!" comment, no?

Personally, I have absolutely no problem with that. In fact, I don't have a problem with well-delivered critique anywhere on POTN. I just think discretion is the better part of valour when it come to people's children. It's just too easy to stray into territory where people feel you're remarking on their 'fat ugly baby' ... even if all you are saying is that they might have considered a less wide-angled lens and not shot quite so close.


David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImageMaker...
looks like I picked a bad week to give up halucinagens
Avatar
2,187 posts
Gallery: 214 photos
Likes: 6778
Joined Dec 2015
Location: AZ-USA
     
Feb 13, 2018 14:30 |  #11053

DaviSto wrote in post #18562953 (external link)
Personally, I have absolutely no problem with that. In fact, I don't have a problem with well-delivered critique anywhere on POTN. I just think discretion is the better part of valour when it come to people's children. It's just too easy to stray into territory where people feel you're remarking on their 'fat ugly baby' ... even if all you are saying is that they might have considered a less wide-angled lens and not shot quite so close.

It’s all perspective...


Nikons, Rolleiflexes, Elinchroms, Broncolor Paras, Billinghams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Osa713
Goldmember
Avatar
1,537 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1227
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
     
Feb 13, 2018 14:37 |  #11054

I did not intend to start a debate but from my stand point the user posting the image is the artist. I see a lot of people throwing in comments throughout this thread masked as CC when in the end it doesn’t benefit anyone. No one learns or improves their photos from some of the unwarranted comments.

This is the internet and people will always state their opinion no matter what, and implications are not the easiest to read especially from strangers.


LIGHT>LENS>BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agedbriar
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Likes: 398
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Slovenia
     
Feb 13, 2018 14:41 |  #11055

agedbriar wrote in post #18562652 (external link)
So, is it all in the eye of the beholder, or not? :lol:

I posted that because it's the critics belief, as stated in their signature.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,792,651 views & 11,673 likes for this thread, 1571 members have posted to it and it is followed by 623 members.
Show us your setup and the final result!
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1299 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.