well canon gets bash on their AF because of the pro level, because suppositly their FF camera are not as good for action as the d700. But if you look at the rebels and the 50D against the d90 and d5000 and d3100/3000 they had the better AF in this segment. And allot of the so call pros think that the better AF of the d700 trickles down to their prosumer and entry, which was not the case.
I think the d7000 is a very good camera. But the difference was akin to the 50D vs D90, but allot closer in performance between the 60D and d7000. The d90 is a good camera, and the cost to performance favored it over the 50d. That way why it was 2009 tipa pick for that sigement. The 60D is price better then the d7000 for the cost vs performance. And canon will sell more 60D for that reason. That .7fps is not a kill must have and the metal vs plastic body is not really important as the d90 proved. You give people a good solid performer at a good price point, and they will buy it.
Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
Canon 60D, T1i/500D, Eos 1, Eos 630, and Olympus epl-1. Current Canon Lenses ef 100 2.8, ef 85 1.8, ef 50 1.4, ef 28 1.8, ef 50 1.8,ef 28-135, ef 70-300, ef-s 18-55, ef-s 55-250, 500D close up lens. Current Olympus lenses oly m4/3 14-42, oly 4/3 35mm 3.5 macro with m4/3 adapter, panasonic 45-200, panasonic 20 1.7. And a Part time Pentax K-X shooter.