When I do "convert and save" to JPEG, the sharpness isn't being retained
Any suggestions, advice?
Much appreciated!
108vc Member 119 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Philadelphia More info | Jan 16, 2011 09:06 | #1 When I do "convert and save" to JPEG, the sharpness isn't being retained www.vcferry.me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Jan 16, 2011 10:19 | #2 Compare the Raw and unresized jpg at 100% view, then report back. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ncjohn Senior Member 751 posts Likes: 5 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Asheville NC More info | An observation that may or may not be relevant: When you sharpen a RAW to (for example) 5, convert and save to JPG, then open the JPG in DPP, the tool palette won't show sharpness 5 (or, rather, the JPG equivalent), it will show sharpness 0 even though it retains the sharpness you set in the RAW.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction. 13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | Jan 16, 2011 11:23 | #4 Rimmer wrote in post #11651461 All I can offer at this point is that this is the third question of the same nature in as many days. Something strange must be going on for so many people with different cameras and computers to be having the same problem with DPP. For starters, which version of DPP are you using? Do you have a way to post a RAW file where others can download it to see if we can duplicate the problem? Thanks! Rimmer - Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2011 21:37 | #5 I am just doing "convert and save" and then opening in Lightroom or PS5 www.vcferry.me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Jan 16, 2011 22:44 | #6 So, let's back up and ask again: first, try this -- do a full size full quality jpeg convert and save, and then open both the Raw file and the jpeg in the DPP Edit window (double-cllick each one in the browser to open two separate windows. Then move the windows to either side so you can actually see a good portion of the image (you may need to close the little "toolbox". Double-click each image to enlarge it to 100% and then slide the images apart to each show a portion of the image that has good detail that you can see in each window simultaneously to compare. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2011 23:16 | #7 here we go www.vcferry.me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Jan 16, 2011 23:18 | #8 I don't know Photobucket, no help there, but we really need to see a 100% crop of the Raw preview as well as a 100% crop of the jpeg before we can comment on "sharpness". Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2011 23:23 | #9 tonylong wrote in post #11656048 I don't know Photobucket, no help there, but we really need to see a 100% crop of the Raw preview as well as a 100% crop of the jpeg before we can comment on "sharpness". look above...you can see the difference very easily www.vcferry.me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Jan 16, 2011 23:49 | #10 OK, I see the difference, now did that show up viewing the images side by side in DPP, or only after you had resized and uploaded them? Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 17, 2011 00:13 | #11 tonylong wrote in post #11656203 OK, I see the difference, now did that show up viewing the images side by side in DPP, or only after you had resized and uploaded them? this is a screen print side by side...exactly how I saw it www.vcferry.me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Jan 17, 2011 00:59 | #12 But it is at "fit to screen", not 1:1. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroimage Goldmember 2,169 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jan 17, 2011 01:02 | #13 For reasons unkown, Canon chose to show sharpening in DPP even when you aren't zoomed to 100%. Unfortunately this means that when you are zoomed out, you get sharpening on the display but the results aren't real. If they were, you would have severe oversharpening when at 100%.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction. 13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | Jan 17, 2011 05:21 | #14 See below: CR2 on the left, jpg on the right. No significant difference. Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction. 13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | Jan 17, 2011 06:35 | #15 On further reflection I think that it was unfair to call what I described above user error. More like user unawareness of the dumbness of DPP's designers. Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is vinceisvisual 943 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||