anyone moved to the 100mm L Macro from the standard edition - any difference in performance.
I usually focus manually so speed of focus not going to be much of a benefit.
john_1dmk2 Member 43 posts Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jan 16, 2011 11:41 | #1 anyone moved to the 100mm L Macro from the standard edition - any difference in performance.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2011 11:45 | #2 If you need IS, then yes. Or if you just want the best of the best, then yes. Otherwise the normal macro still has amazing iQ. Body: Sony a7R IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember  2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | Jan 16, 2011 14:15 | #3 I just changed over from the standard 100mm macro to the 100mm IS L macro and I think the IQ is better on the L lens. If you have the extra money for the L lens then go for it, otherwise the regular 100mm macro lens is still a great lens. Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1171 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
